Daniela Loessner

Dr. Daniela Loessner

1. Department of Chemical Engineering and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 March 2016 in Nature Protocols
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Daniela LoessnerDaniela Loessner
Daniela Loessner
CMChristoph Meinert
Christoph Meinert
EKElke Kaemmerer
Elke Kaemmerer
LMLaure C Martine
Laure C Martine
KYKan Yue
Kan Yue
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher

1 November 2010 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Daniela LoessnerDaniela Loessner
Daniela Loessner
KSKathryn S. Stok
Kathryn S. Stok
MLMatthias P. Lutolf
Matthias P. Lutolf
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
JCJudith A. Clements
Judith A. Clements
SRSimone C. Rizzi
Simone C. Rizzi

1 March 2010 in Trends in Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
Daniela LoessnerDaniela Loessner
Daniela Loessner
SRSimone Rizzi
Simone Rizzi
DKDavid Kaplan
David Kaplan
DMDavid J. Mooney
David J. Mooney
JCJudith A. Clements
Judith A. Clements

1 June 2014 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EKElke Kaemmerer
Elke Kaemmerer
Ferry MelchelsFerry Melchels
Ferry Melchels
BHBoris M. Holzapfel
Boris M. Holzapfel
TMTobias Meckel
Tobias Meckel
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
Daniela LoessnerDaniela Loessner
Daniela Loessner

1 April 2010 in Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VQVerena M.C. Quent
Verena M.C. Quent
Daniela LoessnerDaniela Loessner
Daniela Loessner
TFThor Friis
Thor Friis
JRJohannes C. Reichert
Johannes C. Reichert
Dietmar Werner HutmacherDietmar Werner Hutmacher
Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
Cell proliferation is a critical and frequently studied feature of molecular biology in cancer research. Therefore, various assays are available using different strategies to measure cell proliferation. Metabolic assays such as AlamarBlue, water‐soluble tetrazolium salt and 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyl tetrazolium bromide, which were originally developed to determine cell toxicity, are used to assess cell numbers. Additionally, proliferative activity can be determined by quantification of DNA content using fluorophores such as CyQuant and PicoGreen. Referring to data published in high ranking cancer journals, these assays were applied in 945 publications over the past 14 years to examine the proliferative behaviour of diverse cell types. In these studies, however, mainly metabolic assays were used to quantify changes in cell growth yet these assays may not accurately reflect cellular proliferation rates due to a miscorrelation of metabolic activity and cell number. Testing this hypothesis, we compared the metabolic activity of different cell types, human cancer cells and primary cells, over a time period of 4 days using AlamarBlue and the fluorometric assays CyQuant and PicoGreen to determine their DNA content. Our results show certain discrepancies in terms of over‐estimation of cell proliferation with respect to the metabolic assay in comparison to DNA binding fluorophores.

24 September 2021 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLaura S.M. Lecker
Laura S.M. Lecker
CBChiara Berlato
Chiara Berlato
EMEleni Maniati
Eleni Maniati
RDRobin Delaine-Smith
Robin Delaine-Smith
OPOliver M.T. Pearce
Oliver M.T. Pearce
FBFrances R. Balkwill
Frances R. Balkwill
The tumor microenvironment evolves during malignant progression, with major changes in nonmalignant cells, cytokine networks, and the extracellular matrix (ECM). In this study, we aimed to understand how the ECM changes during neoplastic transformation of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma lesions (STIC) into high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC). Analysis of the mechanical properties of human fallopian tubes (FT) and ovaries revealed that normal FT and fimbria had a lower tissue modulus, a measure of stiffness, than normal or diseased ovaries. Proteomic analysis of the matrisome fraction between FT, fimbria, and ovaries showed significant differences in the ECM protein TGF beta induced (TGFBI, also known as βig-h3). STIC lesions in the fimbria expressed high levels of TGFBI, which was predominantly produced by CD163-positive macrophages proximal to STIC epithelial cells. In vitro stimulation of macrophages with TGFβ and IL4 induced secretion of TGFBI, whereas IFNγ/LPS downregulated macrophage TGFBI expression. Immortalized FT secretory epithelial cells carrying clinically relevant TP53 mutations stimulated macrophages to secrete TGFBI and upregulated integrin αvβ3, a putative TGFBI receptor. Transcriptomic HGSOC datasets showed a significant correlation between TGFBI expression and alternatively activated macrophage signatures. Fibroblasts in HGSOC metastases expressed TGFBI and stimulated macrophage TGFBI production in vitro. Treatment of orthotopic mouse HGSOC tumors with an anti-TGFBI antibody reduced peritoneal tumor size, increased tumor monocytes, and activated β3-expressing unconventional T cells. In conclusion, TGFBI may favor an immunosuppressive microenvironment in STICs that persists in advanced HGSOC. Furthermore, TGFBI may be an effector of the tumor-promoting actions of TGFβ and a potential therapeutic target. Significance: Analysis of ECM changes during neoplastic transformation reveals a role for TGFBI secreted by macrophages in immunosuppression in early ovarian cancer.