Aim: The indications for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) have greatly increased, however, there is still no consensus on the use of spinal anesthesia (SA) during this procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparability of surgical outcomes of RIRS performed under SA versus general GA for renal stones. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective, observational study in patients scheduled for RIRS in a single teaching hospital in Turkey. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years and the presence of single or multiple renal stones. We recorded information concerning the site of lithiasis, the number of calculi, total stone burden, and the presence of concomitant ureteral stones or hydronephrosis. Results were evaluated in terms of surgical outcome, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Patients were followed-up until day 90 from discharge. Results: The data of 502 patients, 252 in GA group and 250 in SA group, were evaluated. The stone-free rate was 81% in the GA group and 85% in the SA group (p = 0.12). No cases of conversion from SA to GA were recorded. Complication rates were similar in the 2 groups (19% vs 14.5%, p = 0.15). Conclusions: In our cohort, RIRS performed under SA and GA was equivalent in terms of surgical results and complications.

Background: Severe burn injuries are a major health problem globally. A profound and prolonged hypermetabolic response develops in severe burn injuries and it is crucial to monitor the patients’ energy requirements in order to meet them adequately. The aim of the present study was to examine the energy changes during the acute phase using the indirect calorimetry (IC) method in severe burn patients. Methods: The study included 15 severe burn patients. Patients with FiO2 >60%, tube thoracostomy, closed underwater drain (CUWD) and air leakage were excluded from the study. Patients’ demographic data, burn percentages, burn types, duration of stay in intensive care, mortality and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores were recorded. Indirect calorimeter measurements were taken once from the patients upon their first arrival and during the following four weeks. Resting energy expenditure (REE), basal metabolic rate (BMR), oxygen consumption (VO₂), carbon dioxide production (VCO₂), body temperatures, presence of sepsis, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) scores were recorded. The data were analysed using SPSS 24 and p-values 40%. A total of 14 (93.33%) had flame burns; 3 (20.00%) patients deceased, and 12 (80.00%) were discharged. The mean APACHE II score was 11.53±6.83. The measured mean values of REE, VO₂, VCO₂ and fever were seen to be the highest in the first week after admission and decreases were observed in the subsequent weeks. SOFA score averages were the highest at admission, and decreased in the following weeks. Conclusion: Severe burn patients were observed to go through the hypermetabolic process in the acute phase and their energy requirements were high particularly in the first week. It was concluded that regular IC monitoring can be beneficial to fully meet the energy requirements of severe burn patients due to the prolonged hypermetabolic process.

Background Vitrectomy surgery is a painful and lengthy procedure. Therefore, administering sedation to reduce patient agitation provides both surgical comfort and hemodynamic stability. However, various complications can arise during the perioperative period depending on the sedation agent used. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil sedation applications on patient hemodynamics and perioperative complications in vitrectomy surgery. Methods Our retrospective study included patients aged 18-70 who underwent vitrectomy surgery between 2021 and 2022 with complete file data and ASA scores of 1-3 after obtaining approval from our hospital's ethics committee. Patients were classified into two groups based on the sedation agent used: Group D for dexmedetomidine and Group R for remifentanil. Demographic data of patients, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, and bispectral index values during perioperative monitoring, operation duration, and complications such as perioperative nausea, vomiting, and low saturation were recorded. The data of both groups were statistically evaluated, with p<0.05 values considered statistically significant. Results Because of missing data in 18 out of 58 patient files, these cases were excluded from the study. A total of 40 patients were included in the study, with 20 in Group D and 20 in Group R. The mean age of the patients was 64. Among them, 18 (45%) were male, and 22 (55%) were female. The mean operation duration was 61.8 ± 24.1 minutes in Group D and 56.3 ± 17.2 minutes in Group R. The heart rate in Group D was statistically significantly lower than in Group R, starting from the 20th minute of the perioperative period. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, and bispectral index values. One case of bradycardia occurred in Group D, requiring intervention. Conclusion In vitrectomy surgery, both dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions can be used for sedation, but caution is advised regarding bradycardia in Group D. Anticipating potential complications with an experienced anesthesia team is crucial for both patient and surgical comfort.

Objective. This study aimed to investigate the necessity of using fluoroscopy in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Material and Methods. A total of 612 patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones were evaluated and divided into two groups. Group 1 routinely underwent the operation with fluoroscopy due to opaque stones (n: 504). In group 2, the procedure was performed without fluoroscopy because of nonopaque stones (n: 108). Both groups were assessed for stone size, location, and number. Success and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Conclusion. This study was designed with the thought of not using fluoroscopy in RIRS patients with nonopaque stones and having the same stone-free rates in opaque stones. In the statistical analysis, there was no difference between the groups with and without scope for stone side, size, localization, and number; likewise, the complication rates developed in the comparison of both groups, stone-free rates, and hospital stay were the same. Discussion. Advances in the calibration of instruments, the development of optical systems, and improvements in imaging system resolution have gradually reduced the need for fluoroscopy in RIRS. This study provides further evidence that fluoroscopy is unnecessary in RIRS procedures, thereby eliminating unnecessary radiation exposure.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the common complications, associated with high mortality and morbidity in patients with burn injuries. This study aimed to determine the frequency of AKI development, its affective factors, and mortality rates according to kidney disease improving global outcomes (KDIGO) criteria in the burn patients.METHODS: The study included patients who are hospitalized for at least 48 h and aged >18 years, whereas patients with a renal transplant, chronic renal failure, undergoing hemodialysis, <18 years of age, with a glomerular filtration rate of <15 on admission, and toxic epidermal necrolysis was excluded from the study. KDIGO criteria were used to evaluate the occurrence of AKI. Burn mechanism, total body surface area, inhalation injury respiratory tract burn, fluid replacement at 72 h with Parkland Formula, mechanical ventilator support, inotrope/vasopressor support, intensive care unit, lenght of stay, mortality, abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI), acute physiology, and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) ve Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) were recorded.RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included in our study, of which 26 (54.2%) developed AKI (+), whereas 22 (45.8%) did not (-). The mean total burn surface area was 47.30% in the AKI (+) group and 19.88% in the AKI (-) group. Mean scores of ABSI, II (APACHE II), and SOFA, the mechanical ventilation and inotrope/vasopressor support and the presence of sepsis were significantly higher in the AKI (+). No mortality was determined in the AKI (-) group, whereas 34.6% in the AKI (+) group which was significantly high.CONCLUSION: AKI was related to high morbidity and mortality in patients with burns. Using KDIGOs, classification in daily follow-up is useful in early diagnosis.