Introduction: The purpose of this study is to determine how long patients who developed pneumothorax were followed up on in the emergency department, how many patients required chest tube placement, and what factors influenced the need for a chest tube in patients who underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous trans -thoracic fine needle aspiration biopsy (PTFNAB).Materials and Methods: Patients who developed pneumothorax following CT-guided PTFNAB were analyzed retrospectively. In cases with pneumotho-rax, the relationship between chest tube placement and the size of the lesion, the lesion depth from the pleural surface, the presence of emphysema, and the needle entry angle were investigated. It was determined how long the patients were followed up in the emergency department, when a chest tube was pla-ced, and when patients who did not require chest tube placement were discharged.Results: CT-guided PTFNAB was performed in 3426 patients within two years. Pneumothorax developed in 314 (9%) cases and a chest tube was placed in 117 (37%). The risk factor for chest tube placement was found to be the lesion depth from the pleural surface. The lesion depth from the pleural surface of >24 mm increased the risk of chest tube placement by 4.8 times. Chest tubes were placed at an average of five hours (5.04 +/- 5.57).Conclusion: This study has shown that in cases with pneumothorax that required chest tube placement, the lesion depth from the pleural surface is a risk factor. Patients who developed pneumothorax on CT during the procedure had chest tubes placed after an average of five hours.
Introduction: the aim of this study is to investigate and report on the data regarding the clinical characteristics and outcomes of healthcare workers with COVID-19 at tertiary education hospitals from Turkey. Materials and Methods: This was a single center, retrospective, descriptive and observational study using cross-sectional data, which were collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients at a tertiary education hospital. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, mortality rates, and the factors associated with hospitalization were analyzed. Results: By May 15, 2020, 480 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 in our hospital where 49 (10.2%) of whom were HCWs. The mean age was 40.0 +/- 8.45 (75.5% female). The most common symptoms were cough (32.7%), fever (30.6%), and myalgia (14.3%). Comorbidities were present in 32.7% of the patients. Most of the HCWs were nurses (53.1%) and physicians (18.4%), and the remaining 14 (28.6%) were cleaning and administrative staff. The severity of the disease was mild in 65.3% and severe in 34.7% HCWs. Leukocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet values were statistically lower in hospitalized patients. There was a statistically significant relationship between the presence of infiltration on the chest X-ray, and the patient's symptoms with the severity of the disease (respectively p= 0.002 and 0.009). Conclusion: In conclusion, the frequency of COVID-19 in healthcare workers is high. The study presents the characteristics of HCWs infected with coronavirus from a single center in Turkey.
INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disease caused by airway and/or parenchymal pathology. Therefore, some patients inevitably have chronic bronchitis and some patients have emphysema. The current thinking is that exercise affects these two major phenotypes differently. In this study, we investigated the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in chronic bronchitis- and emphysema-predominant COPD patients. METHODS: Retrospective data of chronic bronchitis- and emphysema-predominant COPD patients who completed an outpatient 8-week PR program between the years 2013 and 2017 in the PR unit of our hospital were examined. Demographic data (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, long-term oxygen therapy, noninvasive ventilation, emergency admissions, and number of hospitalizations) were recorded. The patients were divided into two groups: chronic bronchitis predominant and emphysema predominant. Patients were assigned to the emphysema-predominant group based on radiology results. Patients were assigned to the chronic bronchitis-predominant group according to clinical description. The two groups were compared using the recorded data cited above. RESULTS: Of the 146 patients, 85 (58.2%) were assigned to the emphysema-predominant group and 61 (41.8%) were assigned to the chronic bronchitis-predominant group. There was no difference between the two groups in age and gender. Pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 s and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO)), arterial blood gas values (pO2, PCO2, and SpO2), 6 min of walking time, and quality of life scores were significantly improved after PR. However, there was no difference between the emphysema- and chronic bronchitis-predominant groups in terms of the improvements after PR. CONCLUSION: In this study, it was observed that the improvement due to PR seen in COPD patients was independent of phenotype. Therefore, all COPD patients should be encouraged to participate in PR programs regardless of their phenotypes.
1 February 2021 in The Clinical Respiratory Journal