Yücel Doğruel

Dr. Yücel Doğruel

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 April 2023 in Neurosurgical Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
USumut tan Sevgi
umut tan Sevgi
GEGökberk Erol
Gökberk Erol
YDYücel Doğruel
Yücel Doğruel
OSOsman Fikret Sönmez
Osman Fikret Sönmez
STShane Tubbs
Shane Tubbs
AGAbuzer Gungor
Abuzer Gungor

1 January 2020 in Polish Journal of Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GGGülsün Gülten
Gülsün Gülten
NYNagİhan Yalçın
Nagİhan Yalçın
BBBahar Baltalarlı
Bahar Baltalarlı
GDGamze Doğu
Gamze Doğu
FAFerİdun Acar
Ferİdun Acar
YDYücel Doğruel
Yücel Doğruel
Numerous genetic pathways associated with glioblastoma development have been identified. In this study, we investigated the prognostic significance of IDH1 and ATRX mutations and WT-1 and p53 expression in glioblastomas and that of surgical methods, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. 83 patients with...

3 September 2022 in Brain Structure and Function
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FYFatih Yakar
Fatih Yakar
PÇPınar Çeltikçi
Pınar Çeltikçi
YDYücel Doğruel
Yücel Doğruel
EEEmrah EGEMEN
Emrah EGEMEN
AGAbuzer Gungor
Abuzer Gungor

4 December 2023 in Operative Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YDYücel Doğruel
Yücel Doğruel
SRSerdar Rahmanov
Serdar Rahmanov
AGAbuzer Gungor
Abuzer Gungor
UTUğur Türe
Uğur Türe

15 November 2024 in Neurosurgical Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
USumut tan Sevgi
umut tan Sevgi
AGAbuzer Gungor
Abuzer Gungor
GEGökberk Erol
Gökberk Erol
ÇCÇağrı Canbolat
Çağrı Canbolat
EMErik Middlebrooks
Erik Middlebrooks
UTUğur Türe
Uğur Türe

9 September 2025 in Acta Neurochirurgica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MÇMahmut Çamlar
Mahmut Çamlar
USumut tan Sevgi
umut tan Sevgi
GEGökberk Erol
Gökberk Erol
FKFurkan Karakaş
Furkan Karakaş
YDYücel Doğruel
Yücel Doğruel
AGAbuzer Gungor
Abuzer Gungor
Background Recent studies suggest that large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are useful tools for medical students or residents when preparing for examinations. These studies, especially those conducted with multiple-choice questions, emphasize that the level of knowledge and response consistency of the LLMs are generally acceptable; however, further optimization is needed in areas such as case discussion, interpretation, and language proficiency. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the performance of six distinct LLMs for Turkish and English neurosurgery multiple-choice questions and assess their accuracy and consistency in a specialized medical context. Methods A total of 599 multiple-choice questions drawn from Turkish Board examinations and an English neurosurgery question bank were presented to six LLMs (ChatGPT-o1pro, ChatGPT-4, AtlasGPT, Gemini, Copilot, and ChatGPT-3.5). Correctness rates were compared using the proportion z-test, and inter-model consistency was examined using Cohen’s kappa. Results ChatGPT-o1pro, ChatGPT-4, and AtlasGPT demonstrated relatively high accuracy for Single Best Answer–Recall of Knowledge (SBA-R), Single Best Answer–Interpretative Application of Knowledge (SBA-I), and True/False question types; however, performance notably decreased for questions with images, with some models leaving many unanswered items. Conclusion Our findings suggest that GPT-4-based models and AtlasGPT can handle specialized neurosurgery questions at a near-expert level for SBA-R, SBA-I, and True/False formats. Nevertheless, all models exhibit notable limitations in questions with images, indicating that these tools remain supplementary rather than definitive solutions for neurosurgical training and decision-making.