Background: The development of effective and safe vaccines and their timely delivery to the public play a crucial role in preventing and managing infectious diseases. Many vaccines have been produced and distributed globally to prevent COVID-19 infection. However, establishing effective vaccine development platforms and evaluating their safety and immunogenicity remains critical to increasing health security, especially in developing countries. Objectives: Therefore, we developed a local subunit vaccine candidate, RENOVAC, and reported its toxicity and immunogenicity profile in animal models. Methods: First, the synthetic gene-coding tandem RBD linked with the GS linker was cloned into the expression vector and expressed in CHO cells. The protein was then purified and filter sterilized, and 10 µg/dose and 25 µg/dose formulations were finally examined for the 14-day repeated dose toxicity followed by the immunogenic profile in preclinical studies. Results: When administered to Sprague Dawley rats by intramuscular route, the vaccine was well tolerated up to and including the dose of 25 µg/animal, and no toxicologically adverse changes were noted. The observed change in weight of the thymus and spleen might be related to the immunological response to the vaccine. The dimer RBD vaccine demonstrated the ability to generate high levels of specific immunoglobulins (IGs) and neutralization antibodies (NAbs). Finally, changes in the amounts of specific T cells and cytokines after vaccination suggested that the vaccine mainly triggers an immune response by activating CD4+ Th2-cells, which then activate B-cells to provide humoral immunity. Conclusions: The study suggests that, based on its reliable immunogenicity and acceptable safety, the vaccine can be further directed for clinical trials.

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are a versatile platform for regenerative medicine and gene delivery because they combine multipotency, immunoregulatory activity, and injury-directed trafficking. Translation is nevertheless limited by donor- and tissue-dependent heterogeneity, variable biodistribution, and engineering-related risks. This review evaluates genetically modified MSCs as medicinal products rather than as a general MSC class. We compare self-inactivating lentiviral (SIN-LV) transduction, which provides efficient and durable expression and has limited early clinical experience, with targeted genome editing, which can define the integration locus and copy number but remains constrained by variable precise knock-in efficiency, off-target and double-strand-break-associated effects, manufacturing cost, and the absence of long-term clinical safety data. We integrate preclinical and clinical evidence with GMP-compatible manufacturing, potency testing, genomic surveillance, and release criteria. Particular attention is given to safe-harbor integration and B2M/CIITA-based hypoimmunogenic designs as strategies to reduce engineering-related batch variability and HLA-dependent donor variability. Together, these developments support a transition from empirically optimized MSC preparations toward molecularly defined cellular medicines with predefined genotype, expression, potency, and safety attributes.