The aim of this study was to analyze the relative frequency, clinical characteristics, disease onset and progression in f-IPF vs. sporadic IPF (s-IPF). Familial IPF index patients and their family members were recruited into the European IPF registry/biobank (eurIPFreg) at the Universities of Giessen and Marburg (UGMLC). Initially, we employed wide range criteria of f-IPF (e.g. relatives who presumably died of some kind of parenchymal lung disease). After narrowing down the search to occurrence of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) in at least one first grade relative, 28 index patients were finally identified, prospectively interviewed and examined. Their family members were phenotyped with establishment of pedigree charts. Within the 28 IPF families, overall 79 patients with f-IPF were identified. In the same observation period, 286 f-IIP and s-IIP patients were recruited into the eurIPFreg at our UGMLC sites, corresponding to a familial versus s-IPF of 9.8%. The both groups showed no difference in demographics (61 vs. 79% males), smoking history, and exposure to any environmental triggers known to cause lung fibrosis. The f-IPF group differed by an earlier age at the onset of the disease (55.4 vs. 63.2 years; p < 0.001). On average, the f-IPF patients presented a significantly milder extent of functional impairment at the time point of inclusion vs. the s-IPF group (FVC 75% pred. vs. FVC 62% pred., p = 0.011). In contrast, the decline in FVC was found to be faster in the f-IPF vs. the s-IPF group (4.94% decline in 6 months in f-IPF vs. 2.48% in s-IPF, p = 0.12). The average age of death in f-IPF group was 67 years vs. 71.8 years in s-IPF group (p = 0.059). The f-IIP group displayed diverse inheritance patterns, mostly autosomal-dominant with variable penetrance. In the f-IPF, the younger generations showed a tendency for earlier manifestation of IPF vs. the older generation (58 vs. 66 years, p = 0.013). The 28 f-IPF index patients presented an earlier onset and more aggressive natural course of the disease. The disease seems to affect consecutive generations at a younger age. Nr. NCT02951416 http://www.www.clinicaltrials.gov

(1) Aim of the study: In spite of extensive research, up to 20% of interstitial lung diseases (ILD) patients cannot be safely classified. We analyzed clinical features, progression factors, and outcomes of unclassifiable ILD (uILD). (2) Methods: A total of 140 uILD subjects from the University of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC) were recruited between 11/2009 and 01/2019 into the European Registry for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (eurIPFreg) and followed until 01/2020. The diagnosis of uILD was applied only when a conclusive diagnosis could not be reached with certainty. (3) Results: In 46.4% of the patients, the uILD diagnosis was due to conflicting clinical, radiological, and pathological data. By applying the diagnostic criteria of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) based on computed tomography (CT), published by the Fleischner Society, 22.2% of the patients displayed a typical UIP pattern. We also showed that forced vital capacity (FVC) at baseline (p = 0.008), annual FVC decline ≥10% (p < 0.0001), smoking (p = 0.033), and a diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) ≤55% of predicted value at baseline (p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with progressive disease. (4) Conclusions: The most important prognostic factors in uILD are baseline level and decline in lung function and smoking. The use of Fleischner diagnostic criteria allows further differentiation and accurate diagnosis.

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic progressive fibrotic pulmonary disease with rising incidence. In this study the effectiveness of pirfenidone, as measured by longitudinal change in individual slope of forced vital capacity (FVC) prior to and after initiating pirfenidone treatment, was evaluated in IPF patients recruited into the European registry for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (eurIPFreg). Secondary variables were the evaluation of the change in individual slope of diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLco), the Borg dyspnea scale, and six-minute walking distance (6MWD), as well as survival analyses. Results: Data of 122 eurIPFreg patients, who had at least two pulmonary function tests (PFTs) prior to or under treatment with pirfenidone, were analyzed by calculating slope-changes. The global analysis revealed an average slope change of +1.48 ± 0.28 (% per annum (p.a)) after start of treatment (p < 0.001), reflecting a reduction in annual FVC decline of approx. 50% under pirfenidone; it also showed a reduction in DLco, and increase in 6MWD (both p < 0.0001), as well as a flattening of the Borg dyspnea scale (p = 0.02). The median survival under treatment was 4.82 years. Patients with a more restrictive disease (FVC < 80% pred.), with a rapid progression (FVC decline >10% pred. p.a.), previous smokers and patients > 60 years of age seemed to profit more from pirfenidone treatment. Conclusions: We report the effectiveness of pirfenidone in a European “real world” IPF cohort with outcome data extending up to 9 years. Global analyses demonstrated a positive effect of pirfenidone on the decline of the lung function over time. Survival was dependent on Gender–Age–Physiology (GAP) score and age prior to therapy.

Background/Objectives: In patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a progressive disease characterized by lung tissue scarring, the impact of comorbidities is only partially understood. In particular, the prognostic implications of pulmonary hypertension (PH) are yet to be fully disclosed. Methods: To identify distinct IPF phenotypes on the basis of comorbidities and functional data, we performed cluster mixed data retrospective analysis, as well as recursive partitioning analysis on a dataset of 324 patients from the European IPF Registry (eurIPFreg); all patients were classified as IPF on the basis of established guidelines. Diagnosis of PH was based on echocardiographic and right heart catheter criteria as indicated in the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines. Results: Two distinct clinical clusters with significant survival differences were identified (p < 0.001). Cluster 1, with fewer comorbidities, had a median survival of 4.41 years, whereas Cluster 2, with higher rates of arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, PH, and dyslipidemia, showed a shorter median survival of 2.85 years. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed PH as a significant predictor of reduced survival (HR 2.03). Recursive partitioning (RP) revealed that FVC was the strongest prognostic indicator: FVC below 50% predicted poor survival, and among patients with a FVC above 50%, the presence of PH indicated a significantly worse outcome. Conclusions: In this real-world IPF cohort, comorbidity cluster and RP analysis identified PH as the most relevant comorbidity. The findings suggest that PH may be more prevalent and impactful in IPF than previously recognized, with implications for clinical management.

Objectives: In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), alterations in the pulmonary surfactant system result in an increased alveolar surface tension and favor repetitive alveolar collapse. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in characterization of regional ventilation in IPF. Materials and methods: We investigated 17 patients with IPF and 15 healthy controls from the University of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Germany, for differences in the following EIT parameters: distribution of ventilation (TID), global inhomogeneity index (GI), regional impedance differences through the delta of end-expiratory lung impedance (dEELI), differences in surface of ventilated area (SURF), as well as center of ventilation (CG) and intratidal gas distribution (ITV). These parameters were assessed under spontaneous breathing and following a predefined escalation protocol of the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), applied through a face mask by an intensive care respirator (EVITA, Draeger, Germany). Results: Individual slopes of dEELI over the PEEP increment protocol were found to be highly significantly increased in both groups (p < 0.001) but were not found to be significantly different between groups. Similarly, dTID slopes were increasing in response to PEEP, but this did not reach statistical significance within or between groups. Individual breathing patterns were very heterogeneous. There were no relevant differences of SURF, GI or CGVD over the PEEP escalation range. A correlation of dEELI to FVC, BMI, age, or weight did not forward significant results. Conclusions: In this study, we did see a significant increase in dEELI and a non-significant increase in dTID in IPF patients as well as in healthy controls in response to an increase of PEEP under spontaneous breathing. We propose the combined measurements of EIT and lung function to assess regional lung ventilation in spontaneously breathing subjects.

Background: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) profoundly affect daily life, limiting mobility, independence, and emotional stability. While antifibrotic therapies may slow physiological decline, the living experience—characterized by breathlessness, cough, frailty, and psychological distress—remains insufficiently understood; this study therefore aimed to capture real-world patient perspectives on functional capacity, self-management, and mental health to identify treatable traits beyond conventional physiological measures. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative online survey was conducted between September 2024 and January 2025 by Lungenfibrose e.V. in collaboration with the Center for Interstitial and Rare Lung Diseases (ZISL), Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (Giessen site). Patients with physician-confirmed ILD completed standardized instruments assessing dyspnea (MRC), cough intensity (VAS-Cough), frailty (CFS), and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Data were analyzed descriptively across physical, functional, and psychosocial domains. Results: The majority of 69 respondents had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (64.7%) with a mean diagnostic delay of 1.4 ± 2.2 years; 69% were diagnosed within two years of symptom onset, and 77% were receiving antifibrotic therapy (nintedanib 57%, pirfenidone 19%). Functional limitations were substantial—55% were mobile for fewer than two hours per day, 73% reported mobility impairment, and oxygen use was common (51% during exertion, 26% at rest). Frailty increased over time (mean CFS 3.2 → 3.8), with 46% classified as fit, 36% vulnerable, and 18% frail. Dyspnea and cough remained burdensome (mean VAS-cough 40 ± 26; 58% moderate–severe), and health-related quality of life was reduced (mean EQ-VAS 56.5 ± 23.7), with high rates of anxiety/depression (78%), limitations in daily activities (76%), and pain/discomfort (74%). Despite overall satisfaction with care (mean 7.1 ± 2.5), respondents frequently reported unmet needs for psychological support and clearer communication about treatment and disease management. Conclusions: Despite antifibrotic therapy and structured specialist care, individuals living with ILD continue to face substantial physical and emotional challenges. Treatable traits—including frailty, dyspnea, inactivity, anxiety, and social isolation—emerge as key determinants of well-being. Multidisciplinary strategies integrating rehabilitation, psychosocial support, and patient education alongside pharmacological therapy are essential to preserve autonomy and improve quality of life in pulmonary fibrosis.