Fernanda A. Orsi

Dr. Fernanda A. Orsi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2021 in British Journal of Haematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FOFernanda A. Orsi
Fernanda A. Orsi
WLWillem M. Lijfering
Willem M. Lijfering
GGGeert‐Jan Geersing
Geert‐Jan Geersing
FRFrits R. Rosendaal
Frits R. Rosendaal
ODOlaf M. Dekkers
Olaf M. Dekkers
SCSuzanne C. Cannegieter
Suzanne C. Cannegieter
Summary: Glucocorticoid treatment increases venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. Whether this is due to the medication or the underlying disease, or affects the risk of VTE recurrence, has been difficult to determine. The aim of our present study was to quantify the risk for first and recurrent VTE associated with oral glucocorticoids use, considering the underlying disease. A total of 2547 patients with VTE from the Multiple Environmental and Genetic Assessment of Risk Factors for Venous Thrombosis (MEGA) study were linked to the Dutch Pharmaceutical Statistics register. The risk of first VTE during periods of exposure with oral glucocorticoids was estimated by the self‐controlled case series method and that of recurrent VTE was examined in a cohort design. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of first VTE in the period of glucocorticoid treatment was 3·51 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·55–4·80]. This IRR was 2·53 (95% CI 1·10–5·72) in the week before treatment started, 5·28 (95% CI 2·89–9·53) in the first 7 days of treatment, remained elevated afterwards and decreased to 1·55 (95% CI 0·85–3·12) after 6 months, as compared to unexposed periods. The hazard ratio for recurrence was 2·72 (95% CI 1·64–4·78) in treatment periods as compared with no treatment. The increased risk of VTE associated with oral glucocorticoid treatment is due to a combined effect of the treatment and the underlying disease, remaining high during the first months of prescription.

5 May 2022 in Thrombosis Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMBruna de Moraes Mazetto
Bruna de Moraes Mazetto
BHBidossessi Wilfried Hounkpe
Bidossessi Wilfried Hounkpe
SSSabrina da Silva Saraiva
Sabrina da Silva Saraiva
GVGislaine Vieira-Damiani
Gislaine Vieira-Damiani
ASAna Paula Rosa dos Santos
Ana Paula Rosa dos Santos
FOFernanda A. Orsi
Fernanda A. Orsi

13 June 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FFF. L. B. Ferreira
F. L. B. Ferreira
MCM. P. Colella
M. P. Colella
SMS. S. Medina
S. S. Medina
CCC. Costa-Lima
C. Costa-Lima
MFM. M. L. Fiusa
M. M. L. Fiusa
EPE. V. De Paula
E. V. De Paula
The differential diagnosis of immune (ITP) and hereditary macrothrombocytopenia (HM) is key to patient management. The immature platelet fraction (IPF) represents the subset of circulating platelets with higher RNA content, and has been shown to distinguish hypo- from hyperproliferative thrombocytopenias. Here we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of IPF in the differential diagnosis between HM and other thrombocytopenias in a population of patients with post-chemotherapy thrombocytopenia (n = 56), bone marrow failure (n = 22), ITP (n = 105) and HM (n = 27). TPO levels were also measured in HM and ITP matched for platelet counts. Platelet counts were similar in all patient groups. Higher IPF values were observed in both ITP (12.3%; 2.4–65.6%) and HM (29.8%; 4.6–65.9%) compared to hypoproliferative thrombocytopenias. IPF values were also higher in HM compared to ITP, yielding a diagnostic accuracy of 0.80 (95%CI 0.70–0.90; P < 0.0001) to distinguish these two conditions. Intra- and inter-assays reproducibility of IPF in HM patients revealed that this is a stable parameter. In conclusion, IPF is increased in HM compared to both ITP and other thrombocytopenias and contributes to the differentiation between ITP and HM. Further studies are warranted to understand the biological rationale of these findings and to its incorporation in diagnostic algorithms of HM.

1 July 2023 in Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ANArthur Cunha De Nardi
Arthur Cunha De Nardi
ACAndréa Coy-Canguçu
Andréa Coy-Canguçu
ASAtena Saito
Atena Saito
MFMaria Fernanda Florio
Maria Fernanda Florio
GMGiovanna Marti
Giovanna Marti
FOFernanda A. Orsi
Fernanda A. Orsi
The evolutionary conserved link between coagulation and innate immunity is a biological process characterized by the thrombosis formation stimulus of immune cells and specific thrombosis-related molecules. In physiological settings, the relationship between the immune system and thrombosis facilitates the recognition of pathogens and damaged cells and inhibits pathogen proliferation. However, when deregulated, the interplay between hemostasis and innate immunity becomes a pathological process named immunothrombosis, which is at the basis of several infectious and inflammation-related thrombotic disorders, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In advanced stages, alterations in both coagulation and immune cell function due to extreme inflammation lead to an increase in blood coagulability, with high rates of thrombosis and mortality. Therefore, understanding underlying mechanisms in immunothrombosis has become decisive for the development of more efficient therapies to treat and prevent thrombosis in COVID-19 and in other thrombotic disorders. In this review, we outline the existing knowledge on the molecular and cellular processes involved in immunothrombosis, focusing on the role of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), platelets and the coagulation pathway. We also describe how the deregulation of hemostasis is associated with pathological conditions and can significantly aggravate a patient's condition, using COVID-19 as a clinical model.

1 January 2008 in Platelets
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SVSuley Mara Chaddad Vancine-Califani
Suley Mara Chaddad Vancine-Califani
EPErich Vinicius De Paula
Erich Vinicius De Paula
MOMargareth Castro Ozelo
Margareth Castro Ozelo
FOFernanda A. Orsi
Fernanda A. Orsi
DFDaniela Ramos Fabri
Daniela Ramos Fabri
JAJoyce Maria Annichino-Bizzacchi
Joyce Maria Annichino-Bizzacchi
In adults with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), steroids are usually proposed as first-line therapy, but long-term complete responses are obtained in no more than 20% of patients. For the remaining patients, splenectomy is considered the treatment of choice, with reported “cure” rates from 60–70%. However, the inherent risks of surgery and sepsis after splenectomy without a guarantee of success justify the search for strategies aimed to avoid splenectomy. Here we retrospectively evaluated the results of dapsone treatment in ITP patients that failed first-line therapy with steroids. These patients received dapsone 100 mg/day for a minimum of 30 days before splenectomy was considered. Efficacy was defined as a sustained rise in platelet counts (>50 × 109/l) clearly attributed to dapsone treatment. Among 52 steroid-dependent or refractory patients, dapsone resulted in sustained increases in platelet counts in 44.2% of patients, after a median follow-up of 21.10 months after treatment initiation. The long-term efficacy of dapsone in this setting is further corroborated by the observation that none of the “responding” patients required splenectomy in the follow-up, compared to 69.0% of the “non-responding” patients. Dapsone-related adverse events were mild and promptly reversed by treatment withdrawal. The results of our retrospective analysis suggest that dapsone is a safe and effective second-line agent for steroid-dependent or refractory ITP patients. Because of its well-known safety profile and low cost compared to other potential second-line treatments for ITP, a trial course of dapsone should be viewed as an attractive option before splenectomy in steroid-dependent of refractory adult ITP patients.

28 July 2013 in BMC Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FOFernanda A. Orsi
Fernanda A. Orsi
RARodrigo Angerami
Rodrigo Angerami
BMBruna M Mazetto
Bruna M Mazetto
SQSusan Kp Quaino
Susan Kp Quaino
FSFernanda Santiago-Bassora
Fernanda Santiago-Bassora
JAJoyce Maria Annichino-Bizzacchi
Joyce Maria Annichino-Bizzacchi
Dengue cases have been classified according to disease severity into dengue fever (DF) and dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF). Although DF is considered a non-severe manifestation of dengue, it has been recently demonstrated that DF represents a heterogeneous group of patients with varied clinical complications and grades of severity. Particularly, bleeding complications, commonly associated to DHF, can be detected in half of the patients with DF. Although a frequent complication, the causes of bleedings in DF have not been fully addressed. Thus, the aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of possible pathophysiological mechanisms that could contribute to the bleeding tendency observed in patients with DF.