Marij J.P. Welters

Dr. Marij J.P. Welters

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 June 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGStefanie de Groot
Stefanie de Groot
RLRieneke T. Lugtenberg
Rieneke T. Lugtenberg
DCDanielle Cohen
Danielle Cohen
MWMarij J.P. Welters
Marij J.P. Welters
IEIlina Ehsan
Ilina Ehsan
ALA. Elise van Leeuwen-Stok
A. Elise van Leeuwen-Stok
Short-term fasting protects tumor-bearing mice against the toxic effects of chemotherapy while enhancing therapeutic efficacy. We randomized 131 patients with HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer, without diabetes and a BMI over 18 kg m−2, to receive either a fasting mimicking diet (FMD) or their regular diet for 3 days prior to and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Here we show that there was no difference in toxicity between both groups, despite the fact that dexamethasone was omitted in the FMD group. A radiologically complete or partial response occurs more often in patients using the FMD (OR 3.168, P = 0.039). Moreover, per-protocol analysis reveals that the Miller&Payne 4/5 pathological response, indicating 90–100% tumor-cell loss, is more likely to occur in patients using the FMD (OR 4.109, P = 0.016). Also, the FMD significantly curtails chemotherapy-induced DNA damage in T-lymphocytes. These positive findings encourage further exploration of the benefits of fasting/FMD in cancer therapy. Trial number: NCT02126449.

4 April 2013 in Journal of Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMariette I E van Poelgeest
Mariette I E van Poelgeest
MWMarij J.P. Welters
Marij J.P. Welters
EEEdith M G van Esch
Edith M G van Esch
LSLinda F M Stynenbosch
Linda F M Stynenbosch
GKGijs Kerpershoek
Gijs Kerpershoek
Sjoerd H. van der BurgSjoerd H. van der Burg
Sjoerd H. van der Burg
Background: Human papilloma virus type 16 (HPV16)-induced gynecological cancers, in particular cervical cancers, are found in many women worldwide. The HPV16 encoded oncoproteins E6 and E7 are tumor-specific targets for the adaptive immune system permitting the development of an HPV16-synthetic long peptide (SLP) vaccine with an excellent treatment profile in animal models. Here, we determined the toxicity, safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of the HPV16 SLP vaccine in patients with advanced or recurrent HPV16-induced gynecological carcinoma. Methods: Patients with HPV16-positive advanced or recurrent gynecological carcinoma (n = 20) were subcutaneously vaccinated with an HPV16-SLP vaccine consisting of a mix of 13 HPV16 E6 and HPV16 E7 overlapping long peptides in Montanide ISA-51 adjuvant. The primary endpoints were safety, toxicity and tumor regression as determined by RECIST. In addition, the vaccine-induced T-cell response was assessed by proliferation and associated cytokine production as well as IFNγ-ELISPOT. Results: No systemic toxicity beyond CTCAE grade II was observed. In a few patients transient flu-like symptoms were observed. In 9 out of 16 tested patients vaccine-induced HPV16-specific proliferative responses were detected which were associated with the production of IFNγ, TNFα, IL-5 and/or IL-10. ELISPOT analysis revealed a vaccine-induced immune response in 11 of the 13 tested patients. The capacity to respond to the vaccine was positively correlated to the patient’s immune status as reflected by their response to common recall antigens at the start of the trial. Median survival was 12.6 ± 9.1 months. No regression of tumors was observed among the 12 evaluable patients. Nineteen patients died of progressive disease. Conclusions: The HPV16-SLP vaccine was well tolerated and induced a broad IFNγ-associated T-cell response in patients with advanced or recurrent HPV16-induced gynecological carcinoma but neither induced tumor regression nor prevented progressive disease. We, therefore, plan to use this vaccine in combination with chemotherapy and immunomodulation.

14 December 2011 in Journal of Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BFBernard A Fox
Bernard A Fox
DSDolores J Schendel
Dolores J Schendel
LBLisa H Butterfield
Lisa H Butterfield
SASteinar Aamdal
Steinar Aamdal
JAJames P Allison
James P Allison
MDMary Lenora Disis
Mary Lenora Disis
Scientific discoveries that provide strong evidence of antitumor effects in preclinical models often encounter significant delays before being tested in patients with cancer. While some of these delays have a scientific basis, others do not. We need to do better. Innovative strategies need to move into early stage clinical trials as quickly as it is safe, and if successful, these therapies should efficiently obtain regulatory approval and widespread clinical application. In late 2009 and 2010 the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), convened an "Immunotherapy Summit" with representatives from immunotherapy organizations representing Europe, Japan, China and North America to discuss collaborations to improve development and delivery of cancer immunotherapy. One of the concepts raised by SITC and defined as critical by all parties was the need to identify hurdles that impede effective translation of cancer immunotherapy. With consensus on these hurdles, international working groups could be developed to make recommendations vetted by the participating organizations. These recommendations could then be considered by regulatory bodies, governmental and private funding agencies, pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions to facilitate changes necessary to accelerate clinical translation of novel immune-based cancer therapies. The critical hurdles identified by representatives of the collaborating organizations, now organized as the World Immunotherapy Council, are presented and discussed in this report. Some of the identified hurdles impede all investigators; others hinder investigators only in certain regions or institutions or are more relevant to specific types of immunotherapy or first-in-humans studies. Each of these hurdles can significantly delay clinical translation of promising advances in immunotherapy yet if overcome, have the potential to improve outcomes of patients with cancer.

20 July 2023 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMarkus Haake
Markus Haake
BHBeatrice Haack
Beatrice Haack
TSTina Schäfer
Tina Schäfer
PHPatrick N. Harter
Patrick N. Harter
GMGreta Mattavelli
Greta Mattavelli
Jörg WischhusenJörg Wischhusen
Jörg Wischhusen
Immune checkpoint blockade therapy is beneficial and even curative for some cancer patients. However, the majority don’t respond to immune therapy. Across different tumor types, pre-existing T cell infiltrates predict response to checkpoint-based immunotherapy. Based on in vitro pharmacological studies, mouse models and analyses of human melanoma patients, we show that the cytokine GDF-15 impairs LFA-1/β2-integrin-mediated adhesion of T cells to activated endothelial cells, which is a pre-requisite of T cell extravasation. In melanoma patients, GDF-15 serum levels strongly correlate with failure of PD-1-based immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Neutralization of GDF-15 improves both T cell trafficking and therapy efficiency in murine tumor models. Thus GDF-15, beside its known role in cancer-related anorexia and cachexia, emerges as a regulator of T cell extravasation into the tumor microenvironment, which provides an even stronger rationale for therapeutic anti-GDF-15 antibody development.

18 March 2020 in Science Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMCornelis J. M. Melief
Cornelis J. M. Melief
MWMarij J.P. Welters
Marij J.P. Welters
IVIgnace Vergote
Ignace Vergote
Judith KroepJudith Kroep
Judith Kroep
GKGemma G. Kenter
Gemma G. Kenter
Sjoerd H. van der BurgSjoerd H. van der Burg
Sjoerd H. van der Burg
A strong vaccine-induced T cell response during standard-of-care chemotherapy correlates with survival in patients with advanced cervical cancer.

1 October 2020 in Cancer Immunology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KKKim E. Kortekaas
Kim E. Kortekaas
SSSaskia J. Santegoets
Saskia J. Santegoets
GSGregor Sturm
Gregor Sturm
IEIlina Ehsan
Ilina Ehsan
SESylvia L. van Egmond
Sylvia L. van Egmond
Sjoerd H. van der BurgSjoerd H. van der Burg
Sjoerd H. van der Burg
The accumulation of tumor-specific CD4+ and CD8+ effector T cells is key to an effective antitumor response. Locally, CD4+ T cells promote the recruitment and effector function of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells and activate innate killer cells in the tumor. Here, we show that tumor-specific CD4+ T cells were predominantly present in the CD39+ subset of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL). The CD39+ CD4+ and CD8+ TILs were detected in three different tumor types, and displayed an activated (PD-1+, HLA-DR+) effector memory phenotype. CD4+CD39+ single-cell RNA-sequenced TILs shared similar well-known activation, tissue residency, and effector cell–associated genes with CD8+CD39+CD103+ TILs. Finally, analysis of directly ex vivo cell-sorted and in vitro expanded pure populations of CD39-positive and negative CD4+ and CD8+ TILs revealed that tumor-specific antigen reactivity was almost exclusively detected among CD39+ cells. Immunotherapy of cancer is based on the activation of tumor-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. We show that the expression of CD39 can be used to identify, isolate, and expand tumor-reactive T-cell populations in cancers.