Patrick Shenjere

Dr. Patrick Shenjere

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 October 2008 in Journal of Clinical Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BEB Eyden
B Eyden
SBS S Banerjee
S S Banerjee
PSPatrick Shenjere
Patrick Shenjere
CFC Fisher
C Fisher
Tumours and tumour-like lesions of myofibroblasts may present diagnostic difficulty because of their rarity and because of uncertainties in identifying the myofibroblast. The objectives of this review are to provide a definition of the myofibroblast and an account of its biology for facilitating an understanding of the cell and of myofibroblastic lesions; and to describe, in the context of common diagnostic problems, the features of benign and malignant myofibroblastic lesions. The main characteristics of the myofibroblast include a spindled or stellate morphology; immunostaining for α-smooth muscle actin and the extra domain A variant of cellular fibronectin; and an ultrastructure of rough endoplasmic reticulum, peripheral contractile filaments and the cell-to-matrix junction known as the fibronexus. On this basis, lesions traditionally regarded as myofibroblastic are shown to vary in their level of differentiation, and some appear to be smooth muscle rather than myofibroblastic. Immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, used together, are emphasised as being important for maximum diagnostic confidence in some myofibroblastic lesions.

1 February 2014 in Melanoma Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKhoja Leila
Khoja Leila
PSPatrick Shenjere
Patrick Shenjere
CHClare Hodgson
Clare Hodgson
JHJackie Hodgetts
Jackie Hodgetts
GCGlen Clack
Glen Clack
CDCaroline Dive
Caroline Dive
We previously demonstrated that circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are detectable by the MelCAM and high molecular weight melanoma-associated antigen (HMW-MAA)-dependent CellSearch platform. However, CTCs which do not express these capture and detection markers are not detectable by CellSearch. Consequently, we explored the use of isolation by size of epithelial tumour cells (ISET), a marker independent, filtration-based device to determine the prevalence and heterogeneity of CTCs in metastatic cutaneous melanoma patients. Ninety patients were prospectively recruited and blood samples taken before treatment. Patients’ blood was filtered using the ISET platform. CTCs were enumerated using dual immunohistochemistry with positive selection by S100 expression and exclusion of leucocytes and endothelial cells expressing CD45 or CD144, respectively. A panel of markers (Melan-A, MITF, MelCAM, high molecular melanoma-associated antigen, CD271 and MAGEC) was also examined. Fifty-one patients (57%) had CTCs (range 1–44 CTCs/4 ml blood) and 12 patients also had circulating tumour microemboli. Seven patients had S100− CTCs, 11 patients’ CTCs were S100+ and 33 patients had S100+ and S100− CTCs. Substantial intrapatient and interpatient heterogeneity was observed for all other melanoma-associated markers. CTCs in metastatic cutaneous melanoma are detectable using the flexible marker-independent ISET platform. CTCs display significant marker expression heterogeneity implying that marker-dependent platforms would not detect all CTCs and multimarker assays are now required to reveal the biological significance of this CTC heterogeneity.

13 June 2014 in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KMKaren L. Morris
Karen L. Morris
JTJonathan D. Tugwood
Jonathan D. Tugwood
KLKhoja Leila
Khoja Leila
MLMatthew Lancashire
Matthew Lancashire
RSRobert Szczepaniak Sloane
Robert Szczepaniak Sloane
CDCaroline Dive
Caroline Dive

1 October 2011 in British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NGNiladri Ghosal
Niladri Ghosal
KMKathleen Mais
Kathleen Mais
PSPatrick Shenjere
Patrick Shenjere
PJP. Julyan
P. Julyan
DHD. Hastings
D. Hastings
NSN.J. Slevin
N.J. Slevin

2 April 2008 in International Journal of Surgical Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMonica Agarwal
Monica Agarwal
PSPatrick Shenjere
Patrick Shenjere
RBRobert W. Blewitt
Robert W. Blewitt
GHGillian Hall
Gillian Hall
PSPhilip Sloan
Philip Sloan
SBS. Sankar Banerjee
S. Sankar Banerjee
Four cases of CD30-positive T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (CD30+ LPD) of the oral mucosa are described. This article aims to draw attention to this entity and to emphasize its usual benign clinical behavior despite its resemblance to T-cell lymphoma. All the patients were adults. Three of the lesions were on the dorsal surface of the tongue and 1 affected the buccal mucosa. All biopsies showed a dense lymphoid infiltrate composed of CD30+ atypical T cells with a polymorphous infiltrate in the background, which included eosinophils. In 1 case, monoclonal T-cell expansion was detected by molecular techniques. Three cases tested for Epstein—Barr virus were all negative. It is concluded that primary CD30+ T-cell LPD of the oral mucosa can be regarded as the oral counterpart of cutaneous CD30+ LPD such as lymphomatoid papulosis or anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Recognition of the condition is important to avoid overtreatment.

29 April 2014 in International Journal of Surgical Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPatrick Shenjere
Patrick Shenjere
CFCyril Fisher
Cyril Fisher
RRRamzi Rajab
Ramzi Rajab
LPLipsta Patnaik
Lipsta Patnaik
SHSteve Hazell
Steve Hazell
KTKhin Thway
Khin Thway
We describe 2 new cases of malignant melanoma with divergent rhabdomyoblastic differentiation occurring in adult patients. The patients were women aged 67 and 51 years with primary cutaneous and uterine cervical melanoma, respectively. Rhabdomyoblastic differentiation in melanoma is very rare in adult patients, and to our knowledge, only 7 such cases have been described in the world literature, of which only 4 have conclusive documentation of the presence of rhabdomyoblastic differentiation. We present the fifth and sixth cases of adult melanomas with conclusive divergent rhabdomyoblastic differentiation, including the first noncutaneous (cervical) case; we also review the literature and highlight the potential for underrecognition of this phenomenon.