Introduction: Hemodialysis patients are at higher risk of developing cognitive impairment, but the pattern of affected cognitive domains is still undetermined. Little is also known about the symptoms of depression and anxiety in hemodialysis patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we included 74 consecutive adult patients undergoing hemodialysis. Cognitive functions were assessed using the Addenbrooke Cognitive Test III. In addition, all patients were screened for symptoms of depression and anxiety using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results: The mean age of hemodialysis patients was 65.69 ± 14 years. Among the patients, there were 27% and 31% of patients with mild cognitive impairment and suspected dementia, respectively. In the group of patients with suspected dementia, all cognitive functions had significantly lower values compared to these functions in incognitively unimpaired and mild cognitive impairment patients. The most impaired domain was verbal fluency, which reflects impairments in executive function. Depression and anxiety symptoms were observed in 28% and 22% of patients, respectively. Patients with anxiety symptoms had higher levels of endogenous creatinine, parathyroid hormone, and hemoglobin, as well as decreased creatinine clearance, being younger and less educated. No factors contributing to the occurrence of depressive symptoms were found. Conclusion: Cognitive dysfunction is a significant problem in hemodialysis patients. Our study showed that the prevalence of cognitive impairment and depression and anxiety symptoms in hemodialysis patients was high. The domain of executive functions was most affected. Furthermore, creatinine, parathyroid hormone, hemoglobin levels, creatinine clearance, and education affected the anxiety scale score.

Data on the potent pleiotropic extraskeletal effects of vitamin D have renewed interest in its use in selected populations, including patients with chronic kidney disease, but the available data are still insufficient to make recommendations. This study assessed the long-term effect of small cholecalciferol doses on serum vitamin D, parathormone (PTH), and bone mineral density (BMD) in hemodialysis patients. Nineteen patients with serum 25(OH)D <20 ng/mL were randomized into cholecalciferol (2000 IU 3×/week) and no-treatment groups, then observed for 1 year. Patients with hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and receiving vitamin D/calcimimetics were excluded. Serum 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)2D, PTH, and alkaline phosphatase activity were examined every 2 months and BMD was measured before and after the study. We observed normalization of serum 25(OH)D with an increase in medians from 11.3 to 44.9 ng/mL (P=0.02) in the cholecalciferol group and no change in the controls (P<0.001). Simultaneously, median serum 1,25(OH)2D increased from 18.2 to 43.1 pmol/L (P=0.02) in the cholecalciferol group and from 10.6 to 21.2 pmol/L (P=0.02) in controls (P=0.013). The treatment was associated with a small increase in serum calcium, but serum phosphate, PTH, alkaline phosphatase, and BMD remained unchanged in both groups. Oral cholecalciferol at a dose of 2000 IU/3×/week is an effective and safe way to treat vitamin D deficiency in hemodialysis patients, leading to a significant increase in serum 1,25(OH)2D. However, it was insufficient to suppress the activity of parathyroid glands or to significantly change BMD.

The study aimed to assess the prevalence of executive function impairment among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing dialysis, with no subjective cognitive problems and with normal global cognition on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We also investigated the relationship between cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive test results. Patients with CKD, including those undergoing renal replacement therapy, are at a higher risk of developing cognitive impairment (CI) than the general population. Recent research has shown CI to be a growing problem among CKD patients worldwide. Yet, it remains underdiagnosed, even though it may significantly influence the lives of patients. In this cross-sectional, prospective study, 58 dialysis patients with no cognitive decline on the MMSE screening were assessed for executive function impairment using the Executive Clock-Drawing Task (CLOX). Moreover, past medical history, demographic data, and laboratory test results were collected. The mean patient age was 59.47 ± 14.98 years, and the mean duration of dialysis was 45.93 ± 48.49 months. The prevalence of executive function impairment amounted to 8.6%. Moreover, remarkably similar pattern of clock drawing was observed, with numbers written outside the clock face in the CLOX1 test. Executive dysfunctions in dialysis patients may manifest itself before the onset of global cognitive impairment. There appear to be a deficit in the spatial domain as well. Better education may play a protective role.

It is widely accepted that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) should play an active role in the selection of renal replacement therapy (RRT) option. However, patients' knowledge about CKD and treatment options is limited. The implementation of structured education program and shared decision-making may result in a better preparation to RRT, more balanced choice of dialysis modalities and better access to kidney transplantation (TX). The aim of this long-term study was to assess the impact of formalized Predialysis Education Program (fPEP) on knowlege on RRT options, as well as on selected and definitive therapy. The study included 435 patients (53% men, mean age 60 years) with CKD stage 4 and 5, participating in fPEP at our center. The program included at least 3 visits, during which balanced information about all RRT options was presented and self-care and informed decision-making were encouraged. The knowledge about RRT options before and after fPEP attendance, and selected and definitive RRT options were assessed. Ninety-two percent of patients received prior nephrology care. After fPEP completion, in most patients, the knowledge about CKD and RRT options and selected preferred modality improved - 40% of participants chose hemodialysis (HD), 32% peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 18% TX. During the observation period, 4% of patients died before commencement of dialysis, 2.7% received preemptive kidney transplant, 8.6% were placed on transplant waiting list, and 94% started dialysis (30% PD and 70% HD). Among those who chose PD, 69% started PD and 24% started HD; the leading causes of the discrepancy between choosing and receiving PD was the deterioration in clinical condition (50%) and change of decision (32%). The fPEP increases CKD patients' knowledge on RRT methods. The implementation of a decision-making process based on fPEP leads to a satisfying distribution between modalities, with a good concordance between chosen and definitive modality.

This article aims to identify the reasons why patients with major depressive episode (MDE) do not seek treatment for their mental disorder. 89 out of 208 persons screened were diagnosed with major depressive episode using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. 85 individuals with untreated depression filled out the following questionnaires: Beck Depression Inventory, List of Explanations of Well-Being (LEWB), Brief Measure to Assess Perception of Self-Influence on the Course of the Disease, Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, Brief Method of Evaluating Coping with Disease, and Metacognitions Questionnaire. There were 43 women (50.6%) and 42 men (49.4%), aged 24 to 93 years (Mean (M) = 68.26 years; Standard Deviation (SD) = 14.19 years), with dialysis vintage ranging from 1 month to 33 years (M = 70.63 months; SD = 75.26 months). Among study patients, 70.6% declared that depression was the cause of their poor well-being, 75.3% attributed their depressive symptoms to kidney failure, and 49.4%, more specifically, to hemodialysis. A total of 64.7% of patients had a low perception of self-influence on the course of their kidney disease, and 58.5% presented a coping style focused on emotions. The most frequent dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs were negative beliefs about not controlling one’s own thoughts. This attitude was related to the low perception of self-influence on the course of the disease, maladaptive coping styles, and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs.