Mariz Sintaha

Dr. Mariz Sintaha

Department of Life Sciences, Independent University, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Yee-Shan KuYee-Shan Ku
Yee-Shan Ku
Mariz SintahaMariz Sintaha
Mariz Sintaha
MCMing-Yan Cheung
Ming-Yan Cheung
Hon-Ming LamHon-Ming Lam
Hon-Ming Lam
In the natural environment, plants are often bombarded by a combination of abiotic (such as drought, salt, heat or cold) and biotic (necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens) stresses simultaneously. It is critical to understand how the various response pathways to these stresses interact with one another within the plants, and where the points of crosstalk occur which switch the responses from one pathway to another. Calcium sensors are often regarded as the first line of response to external stimuli to trigger downstream signaling. Abscisic acid (ABA) is a major phytohormone regulating stress responses, and it interacts with the jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) signaling pathways to channel resources into mitigating the effects of abiotic stresses versus defending against pathogens. The signal transduction in these pathways are often carried out via GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins) which comprise of a large group of proteins that are varied in structures and functions. Deciphering the combined actions of these different signaling pathways in plants would greatly enhance the ability of breeders to develop food crops that can thrive in deteriorating environmental conditions under climate change, and that can maintain or even increase crop yield.

1 March 2018 in The Lancet Global Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAdrianna Murphy
Adrianna Murphy
BPBenjamin Palafox
Benjamin Palafox
OOOwen O'DOnnell
Owen O'DOnnell
DSDavid Stuckler
David Stuckler
PPPablo Perel
Pablo Perel
MMMartin McKee
Martin McKee
There is little evidence on the use of secondary prevention medicines for cardiovascular disease by socioeconomic groups in countries at different levels of economic development. We assessed use of antiplatelet, cholesterol, and blood-pressure-lowering drugs in 8492 individuals with self-reported cardiovascular disease from 21 countries enrolled in the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Defining one or more drugs as a minimal level of secondary prevention, wealth-related inequality was measured using the Wagstaff concentration index, scaled from -1 (pro-poor) to 1 (pro-rich), standardised by age and sex. Correlations between inequalities and national health-related indicators were estimated. The proportion of patients with cardiovascular disease on three medications ranged from 0% in South Africa (95% CI 0-1·7), Tanzania (0-3·6), and Zimbabwe (0-5·1), to 49·3% in Canada (44·4-54·3). Proportions receiving at least one drug varied from 2·0% (95% CI 0·5-6·9) in Tanzania to 91·4% (86·6-94·6) in Sweden. There was significant (p<0·05) pro-rich inequality in Saudi Arabia, China, Colombia, India, Pakistan, and Zimbabwe. Pro-poor distributions were observed in Sweden, Brazil, Chile, Poland, and the occupied Palestinian territory. The strongest predictors of inequality were public expenditure on health and overall use of secondary prevention medicines. Use of medication for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease is alarmingly low. In many countries with the lowest use, pro-rich inequality is greatest. Policies associated with an equal or pro-poor distribution include free medications and community health programmes to support adherence to medications. Full funding sources listed at the end of the paper (see Acknowledgments).

2 November 2022 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mariz SintahaMariz Sintaha
Mariz Sintaha
CMChun-Kuen Man
Chun-Kuen Man
Wai-Shing YungWai-Shing Yung
Wai-Shing Yung
SDShaowei Duan
Shaowei Duan
MLMan-Wah Li
Man-Wah Li
Hon-Ming LamHon-Ming Lam
Hon-Ming Lam
The capability of a plant to protect itself from stress-related damages is termed “adaptability” and the phenomenon of showing better performance in subsequent stress is termed “stress memory”. While drought is one of the most serious disasters to result from climate change, the current understanding of drought stress priming in soybean is still inadequate for effective crop improvement. To fill this gap, in this study, the drought memory response was evaluated in cultivated soybean (Glycine max). To determine if a priming stress prior to a drought stress would be beneficial to the survival of soybean, plants were divided into three treatment groups: the unprimed group receiving one cycle of stress (1S), the primed group receiving two cycles of stress (2S), and the unstressed control group not subjected to any stress (US). When compared with the unprimed plants, priming led to a reduction of drought stress index (DSI) by 3, resulting in more than 14% increase in surviving leaves, more than 13% increase in leaf water content, slight increase in shoot water content and a slower rate of loss of water from the detached leaves. Primed plants had less than 60% the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance compared to the unprimed plants, accompanied by a slight drop in photosynthesis rate, and about a 30% increase in water usage efficiency (WUE). Priming also increased the root-to-shoot ratio, potentially improving water uptake. Selected genes encoding late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins and MYB, NAC and PP2C domain-containing transcription factors were shown to be highly induced in primed plants compared to the unprimed group. In conclusion, priming significantly improved the drought stress response in soybean during recurrent drought, partially through the maintenance of water status and stronger expression of stress related genes. In sum, we have identified key physiological parameters for soybean which may be used as indicators for future genetic study to identify the genetic element controlling the drought stress priming.

2 July 2025 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mariz SintahaMariz Sintaha
Mariz Sintaha
The ability of plants to protect themselves from stress-related damages is termed “adaptability” and the phenomenon of showing better performance in subsequent stress is termed “stress memory”. This phenomenon has been reported in various stresses such as drought, heat, salinity, cold, and heavy metal toxicity. Histone modification leading to chromatin remodeling and accumulation of phosphorylated RNA polymerase on the promoters of memory genes is a well-known mechanism of plant stress memory. Recent studies have revealed the role of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and alternative splicing (AS) in memory-specific gene expression and transgenerational inheritance of stress memory. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) inhibit specific genes to enable plants to respond better in subsequent drought and heat stress, while long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play roles in epigenetic regulation of memory gene expression in cold and salt stress. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) lead to DNA methylation during the memory response of biotic, salt, and heavy metal stress. Simultaneously, stress-responsive isoforms of tolerant genes are found to be expressed as a memory response in subsequent heat stress. This review highlights the stress-type-specific roles of ncRNAs and AS in establishing, maintaining, and transmitting stress memory, offering insights into their potential for improving crop resilience through genetic and epigenetic priming strategies.