Luca Del Zotto

Prof. Luca Del Zotto

Università degli Studi eCampus, Novedrate, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2022 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Roberta CaponiRoberta Caponi
Roberta Caponi
Andrea Monforti FerrarioAndrea Monforti Ferrario
Andrea Monforti Ferrario
Luca Del ZottoLuca Del Zotto
Luca Del Zotto
Enrico BocciEnrico Bocci
Enrico Bocci

6 July 2022 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Roberta CaponiRoberta Caponi
Roberta Caponi
Andrea Monforti FerrarioAndrea Monforti Ferrario
Andrea Monforti Ferrario
Enrico BocciEnrico Bocci
Enrico Bocci
SBSandra Bødker
Sandra Bødker
Luca Del ZottoLuca Del Zotto
Luca Del Zotto

1 February 2015 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAndrea Calabriso
Andrea Calabriso
Luca CedolaLuca Cedola
Luca Cedola
Luca Del ZottoLuca Del Zotto
Luca Del Zotto
FRFranco Rispoli
Franco Rispoli
SSSimone Giovanni Santori
Simone Giovanni Santori

1 October 2019 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Alessia ArteconiAlessia Arteconi
Alessia Arteconi
Luca Del ZottoLuca Del Zotto
Luca Del Zotto
RTRoberto Tascioni
Roberto Tascioni
Luca CioccolantiLuca Cioccolanti
Luca Cioccolanti

1 January 2017 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAndrea Calabriso
Andrea Calabriso
Domenico BorelloDomenico Borello
Domenico Borello
GRGiovanni Paolo Romano
Giovanni Paolo Romano
LCLuca Cedola
Luca Cedola
Luca Del ZottoLuca Del Zotto
Luca Del Zotto
SSSimone Giovanni Santori
Simone Giovanni Santori

5 October 2020 in Computation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMVera Marcantonio
Vera Marcantonio
Andrea Monforti FerrarioAndrea Monforti Ferrario
Andrea Monforti Ferrario
Andrea Di CarloAndrea Di Carlo
Andrea Di Carlo
Luca Del ZottoLuca Del Zotto
Luca Del Zotto
Danilo MonarcaDanilo Monarca
Danilo Monarca
Enrico BocciEnrico Bocci
Enrico Bocci
Biomass is one of the most widespread and accessible energy source and steam gasification is one of the most important processes to convert biomass into combustible gases. However, to date the difference of results between the main models used to predict steam gasification producer gas composition have been not analyzed in details. Indeed, gasification, involving heterogeneous reactions, does not reach thermodynamic equilibrium and so thermodynamic models with experimental corrections and kinetic models are mainly applied. Thus, this paper compares a 1-D kinetic model developed in MATLAB, combining hydrodynamics and reaction kinetics, and a 0-D thermodynamic model developed in Aspen Plus, based on Gibbs free energy minimization applying the quasi-equilibrium approach, calibrated by experimental data. After a comparison of the results of the models against experimental data at two S/B ratios, a sensitivity analysis for a wide range of S/B ratios has been performed. The experimental comparison and sensitivity analysis shows that the two models provide sufficiently similar data in terms of the main components of the syngas although the thermodynamic model shows, with increasing S/B, a greater increase of H2 and CO2 and lower decrease of CH4 and CO respect to the kinetic one and the experimental data. Thus, the thermodynamic model, despite being calibrated by experimental data, can be used mainly to analyze global plant performance due to the reduced importance of the discrepancy from a global energy and plant perspective. Meanwhile, the more complex kinetic model should be used when a more precise gas composition is needed and, of course, for reactor design.