Jason Peart

Dr. Jason Peart

School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4217, Australia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2007 in Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJason Peart
Jason Peart
JHJohn P. Headrick
John P. Headrick

27 February 2015 in British Journal of Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJohn P. Headrick
John P. Headrick
LHLouise See Hoe
Louise See Hoe
ETEugene F. Du Toit
Eugene F. Du Toit
JPJason Peart
Jason Peart

23 May 2008 in Basic Research in Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJason Peart
Jason Peart
EGEric R. Gross
Eric R. Gross
MRMelissa E. Reichelt
Melissa E. Reichelt
AHAnna Hsu
Anna Hsu
JHJohn P. Headrick
John P. Headrick
GGGarrett J. Gross
Garrett J. Gross

1 June 2009 in American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJason Peart
Jason Peart
JHJohn P. Headrick
John P. Headrick
Adjunctive cardioprotective strategies for ameliorating the reversible and irreversible injuries with ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) are highly desirable. However, after decades of research, the promise of clinical cardioprotection from I/R injury remains poorly realized. This may arise from the challenges of trialing and effectively translating experimental findings from laboratory models to patients. One can additionally consider whether features of the more heavily focused upon candidates could limit or preclude therapeutic utility and thus whether we might shift attention to alternate strategies. The phenomena of preconditioning and postconditioning have proven fertile in identification of experimental means of cardioprotection and are the most intensely interrogated responses in the field. However, there is evidence these processes, which share common molecular signaling elements and end effectors, may be poor choices for clinical exploitation. This includes evidence of age dependence, limiting efficacy in target aged or senescent hearts; refractoriness to conditioning stimuli in diseased myocardium; interference from a variety of relevant pharmaceuticals; inadvertent induction of these responses by prior ischemia or commonly used drugs, precluding further benefit; and sex dependence of protective signaling. This review focuses on these features, raising questions about current research strategies, and the suitability of these widely studied phenomena as rational candidates for clinical translation.

1 October 2006 in American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJason Peart
Jason Peart
GGGarrett J. Gross
Garrett J. Gross
A 5-day exposure to morphine exerts a profound cardioprotective phenotype in murine hearts. In the present study, we examined mechanisms by which morphine generates this effect, exploring the roles of Giand Gsproteins, PKA, PKC, and β-adrenergic receptors (β-AR) in acute and chronic opioid preconditioning. Langendorff-perfused hearts from placebo, acute morphine (AM; 10 μmol/l)-, or chronic morphine (CM)-treated mice (75-mg pellet, 5 days) underwent 25-min ischemia and 45-min reperfusion. After reperfusion, placebo-treated hearts exhibited marked contractile and diastolic dysfunction [rate-pressure product (RPP), 40 ± 4% baseline; end-diastolic pressure (EDP), 33 ± 3 mmHg], whereas AM hearts showed significant improvement in recovery of RPP and EDP (60 ± 3% and 23 ± 4 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.05 vs. placebo). Furthermore, CM hearts demonstrated a complete return of diastolic function and significantly greater recovery of contractile function (83 ± 3%, P < 0.05 vs. both placebo and AM). Pretreatment with Giprotein inhibitor pertussis toxin abolished AM protection while partially attenuating CM recovery ( P < 0.05 vs. placebo). Treatment with Gsinhibitor NF-449 did not affect AM preconditioning yet completely abrogated CM preconditioning. Similarly, PKA inhibition significantly attenuated the ischemia-tolerant state afforded by CM, whereas it was ineffective in AM hearts. PKC inhibition with chelerythrine was ineffective in CM hearts while completely abrogating AM preconditioning. Moreover, whereas β1-AR blockade with CGP-20712A failed to alter recovery in CM hearts, the β2-AR antagonist ICI-118,551 significantly attenuated postischemic recovery. These data describe novel findings whereby CM preconditioning is mediated by a PKC-independent pathway involving PKA, β2-AR, and Gsproteins, whereas AM preconditioning is mediated via Giproteins and PKC.

1 May 2007 in Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJason Peart
Jason Peart
EGEric R. Gross
Eric R. Gross
JHJohn P. Headrick
John P. Headrick
GGGarretta J. Gross
Garretta J. Gross