Verena Kirn

Prof. Dr. Verena Kirn

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Clinical & Experimental Metastasis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VKVerena Kirn
Verena Kirn
LSLeonie Strake
Leonie Strake
FTFabinshy Thangarajah
Fabinshy Thangarajah
LRLisa Richters
Lisa Richters
HEHannah Eischeid
Hannah Eischeid
JFJochen Fries
Jochen Fries

17 December 2014 in International Journal of Breast Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WMWolfram Malter
Wolfram Malter
VKVerena Kirn
Verena Kirn
LRLisa Richters
Lisa Richters
CFClaudius Fridrich
Claudius Fridrich
BMBirgid Markiefka
Birgid Markiefka
SKStefan Kraemer
Stefan Kraemer
Breast-conserving surgery followed by whole-breast irradiation is the standard local therapy for early breast cancer. The international discussion of reduced importance of wider tumor-free resection margins than “tumor not touching ink” leads to the development of five principles in targeted oncoplastic breast surgery. IORT improves local recurrence risk and diminishes toxicity since there is less irradiation of healthy tissue. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) can be delivered in two settings: an IORT boost followed by a conventional regimen of external beam radiotherapy or a single IORT dose. The data from TARGIT-A and ELIOT reinforce the conviction that intraoperative radiotherapy during breast-conserving surgery is a reliable alternative to conventional postoperative fractionated irradiation, but only in a carefully selected population at low risk of local recurrence. We describe our experiences with IORT boost (50 kV energy X-rays; 20 Gy) in combination with targeted oncoplastic breast surgery in a routine clinical setting. Our experiences demonstrate the applicability and reliability of combining IORT boost with targeted oncoplastic breast surgery in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer.

8 June 2014 in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VKVerena Kirn
Verena Kirn
RSRong Shi
Rong Shi
SHSabine Heublein
Sabine Heublein
JKJulia Knabl
Julia Knabl
MGMargit Guenthner-Biller
Margit Guenthner-Biller
UJUdo Jeschke
Udo Jeschke

1 February 2014
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VKVerena Kirn
Verena Kirn
IZIvanka Zaharieva
Ivanka Zaharieva
SHSabine Heublein
Sabine Heublein
FTFabinshy Thangarajah
Fabinshy Thangarajah
KFKlaus Friese
Klaus Friese
UJUdo Jeschke
Udo Jeschke

19 September 2014 in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VKVerena Kirn
Verena Kirn
PGPamina Geiger
Pamina Geiger
CRChristina Riedel
Christina Riedel
FBFlorian Bergauer
Florian Bergauer
KFKlaus Friese
Klaus Friese
JKJulia Knabl
Julia Knabl

14 January 2022 in Breast Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMarcus Jannes
Marcus Jannes
AKAlexander König
Alexander König
MKMartin Kolben
Martin Kolben
CFClaudius Fridrich
Claudius Fridrich
VKVerena Kirn
Verena Kirn
Introduction: The risk for metastasis at primary diagnosis of breast cancer is about 4%. The German guidelines give clear indications on when, who, and how to stage breast cancer patients. Ideally, this should be done via computerized axial tomography (CAT) scan of the thorax and abdomen and an additional bone scan. But daily practice shows that the way health-care providers handle staging recommendations can vary. To objectify adherence to guidelines we started a nation-wide survey. Methods: Between July and September 2020, we sent out a survey via email to all certified and noncertified breast centers and in addition to all Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Germany. We asked for timing of staging, conditions that cause staging, and the applied method. In case we did not get any reply, we sent out a reminder. Results: A total of 220 certified breast centers, 28 noncertified breast centers, and 48 Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology who care for breast cancer patients took part in our survey. A general pretherapeutic staging was performed in 16.4%, 39.3%, and 66.7% of all institutions and a general postoperative staging was performed in 4.1%, 0%, and 6.3% of each institutional type, respectively. In terms of the applied method, 75% of all certified breast centers used a CAT scan and bone scan, while 23.3% primarily used chest X-ray, ultrasound of the abdomen (27.7%), or MRI. As a potential reason for using X-ray and ultrasound, the presence of a “low-risk” breast cancer was mentioned. Summary: Although certified breast centers show the highest adherence to current guidelines, some still perform a general staging or do not use the recommended staging method. The low probability of primary metastatic breast cancer and the use of a reasonable exposure to radiation warrant a critical discussion.