Background/Objectives: To ensure that non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is completely removed in healthy tissue, micrographically controlled surgery (3D histology) is often performed, which can prolong the inpatient stay. This study examined ex vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (evRCM) for perioperative assessment of surgical margins, specifically in cases where re-excision was necessary due to incomplete removal of cutaneous tumor tissue. Methods: NMSC re-excisions were evaluated using evRCM by a cutaneous surgeon, with retrospective review by an independent pathologist when results differed from histology. Results: evRCM demonstrated high specificity (0.96; 95% CI, 0.90–0.99) but low sensitivity (0.20; 95% CI, 0.06–0.51). Unlike pathology, which discards outer surgical margins, evRCM examined the true surgical margins. Retrospective pathology analysis of the misdiagnosed cases confirmed that 25% (n = 2/8) were false negative and 75% (n = 6/8) were potentially false positive, resulting in a sensitivity of 0.2–0.8. Notably, evRCM led to a 113-day reduction in in-hospital stays, probably resulting in increased patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: evRCM was valuable for speeding up the assessment of surgical margins in patients with re-excised NMSC. Proper tissue preparation and assessment require interdisciplinary collaboration between cutaneous surgeons, pathologists, and physician assistants, emphasizing the need for standardized operating procedures.

Context: The treatment of allergic reactions to red tattoo dye is challenging in most cases, as local therapy often does not offer long-term improvement and laser therapy is considered relatively contraindicated by many authors owing to the risk of generalized side effects. Therefore, surgical removal of these tattoos is favored; shave excision is the method of choice, particularly for the removal of the entire dye. Aims: The aim of this article was to retrospectively analyze the best post-operative outcome after surgical removal of allergic tattoo reactions using different excision techniques. Materials and Methods: We compared the different surgical procedures performed on seven patients with single and multiple allergic tattoo reactions treated between 2013 and 2018. Results: The best aesthetic results were achieved by superficial ablation of the inflammatory reaction, partially leaving tattoo remains in the skin. Conclusion: Based on our experience with this small number of patients, a superficial removal of the tattoo without complete removal of the dye is, in most cases, sufficient to achieve healing. The remaining dye residues seem to be better tolerated by the immune system afterwards. Furthermore, the tattoo is often preserved in large parts.

Background: Cutaneous metastases (CM) are a frequent finding in the follow‐up of malignant tumours.Objectives: CM were examined with dermoscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT), dynamic OCT and line‐field confocal OCT (LC‐OCT) to describe common findings.Methods: In the University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany, 18 patients with 61 CM were examined with dermoscopy. CM (n = 43, 31 melanoma metastases, two metastases of renal carcinoma, five metastases of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and five metastases of pleomorphic dermal sarcoma) were examined with OCT (VivoSight® Michelson Diagnostics). Additional 18 melanoma metastases were examined with LC‐OCT (deepLive™; Damae Medical).Results: CM were localized on the head, trunk, neck and limbs. Dermoscopy patterns were angioma‐like, nevus‐like nonglobular, nevus‐like globular, blue nevus‐like and unspecific. CM showed an ulceration, hyperkeratosis with increased entrance signal and disturbed architecture of the epidermis in OCT. In deeper metastases, the dermoepidermal junction (DEJ) was normal; in most cases it was disturbed. CM were visible as subepidermal hyporeflective roundish area, with septae, with either clear margin and shadowing or blurred margin. DOCT showed dot, coiled, serpiginous and branched vessels; there was a disarray in size and distribution and vessels were converging on the centre of the metastasis. In LC‐OCT, CM showed enhanced entrance signal and disturbed architecture of a thinned epidermis, ulceration, atypical honeycomb or cobblestone pattern as well as a broken DEJ. In the dermis, a hyporeflective roundish area with clusters of hyporeflective cells with septae, clear margin and clefting or blurred margin was visible; the hyporeflective area was surrounded by bundles of connective tissue. Subepidermal vessels differentiated in size and distribution. Inflammatory, dendritic and pagetoid cells were visible.Conclusions: OCT and LC‐OCT may be useful tools for immediate diagnosis, localization of CM and monitoring under treatment in addition to conventional methods like ultrasound and histopathology.

Background: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) can yield improved diagnostic accuracy of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in comparison with dermoscopy alone.Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of OCT and RCM together and individually with that of dermoscopy.Methods: Patients with lesions suspicious for NMSC were randomized into two groups in a prospective, single‐centre study. In the intervention group (IG), every lesion was examined with dermoscopy, OCT and RCM, while in the control group (CG), every lesion was examined with dermoscopy alone.Results: A total of 365 lesions of 250 patients (105 female, 145 male) were included in the study. A total of 208 basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), 65 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and 31 SCCs in situ were examined histologically. The IG involved significantly fewer biopsies than the CG (14 vs. 27, p = 0.029) and required fewer additional inpatient stays due to positive biopsy results (2 vs. 12, p = 0.001). For the diagnosis of BCC, diagnostic accuracy was 81% with dermoscopy, 84% with OCT, 83% with RCM and 85% with the combination of OCT and RCM (OCT/RCM). The diagnostic accuracy of OCT for BCC subtypes was as follows: superficial, 89%; nodular, 79%; sclerodermiform, 82%; and nodular‐cystic BCC, 75%. For the diagnosis of SCC, diagnostic accuracy was 85% with dermoscopy, 87% with OCT, 89% with RCM and 87% with OCT/RCM. For the diagnosis of in situ SCC, diagnostic accuracy was 87% with dermoscopy, 89% with OCT, 89% with RCM and 91% with OCT/RCM.Conclusions: Diagnostic accuracy increased with OCT and RCM and was even higher when both methods were used together. OCT and RCM could facilitate optimization of lesion management by reducing the number of punch biopsies and reducing additional inpatient stays due to positive biopsy results.