Laura Preuss

Dr. Laura Preuss

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 September 2025 in Clinical Research in Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASA. Stundl
A. Stundl
LPLaura Preuss
Laura Preuss
APA. Prinzing
A. Prinzing
JVJ. C. Voran
J. C. Voran
HSH. Seoudy
H. Seoudy
CKC. Kupatt
C. Kupatt
Background: In elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is common. Escpecially for intermediate-risk patients eligible for both interventional and surgical treatment, long-term benefit of either approach remains unclear. Objectives: To compare long-term outcomes of TAVI + PCI versus SAVR + CABG in intermediate-risk AS-CAD patients (logistic EuroSCORE 10–20%, EuroSCORE II 4–9%). Methods: This retrospective multicentre study included 366 patients treated between 2012 and 2020: 211 underwent TAVI + PCI and 155 received SAVR + CABG. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality up to three years; secondary outcomes followed VARC-3 criteria. Results: Mortality rates were similar at 30 days (4.8% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.16), six months (12.4% each), one year (18.1% vs. 15.7%) and two years (24.9% vs. 20.1%). At three years, mortality was higher after TAVI + PCI (37.1% vs. 25.5%, p = 0.02), though CAD complexity was greater in the SAVR + CABG group (SYNTAX Score 22.2 vs. 15.9, p < 0.001). TAVI + PCI patients were older (81.1 vs. 78.5 years, p < 0.001), but surgical risk was comparable (EuroSCORE II 6.4% vs. 6.2%). Surgical patients experienced more complications, including delirium, stroke, acute kidney injury, major bleedings and transfusion needs. After propensity score matching (154 patients per group), 3-year mortality no longer differed significantly (33.8% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.14). Conclusion: Both TAVI + PCI and SAVR + CABG yield comparable long-term outcomes in intermediate-risk AS-CAD patients. Although early complications were more common with surgery, there was a trend towards improved long-term survival.

18 August 2026 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GHGretha Hecke
Gretha Hecke
NCNikolaus Clodi
Nikolaus Clodi
BSBernhard Scharinger
Bernhard Scharinger
MHMatthias Hammerer
Matthias Hammerer
LPLaura Preuss
Laura Preuss
NSNikolaos Schörghofer
Nikolaos Schörghofer
Background: Pericardial effusion is a common finding on pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, its clinical significance remains uncertain. Using artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis, we sought to determine whether pericardial effusion represents an incidental imaging finding, a marker of hemodynamic burden, or a prognostically relevant phenotype. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 470 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI for severe aortic stenosis. Pericardial effusion volume was quantified using an AI-based CT segmentation workflow and categorized as no effusion (0 mL), trace effusion (>0–<5 mL), small effusion (5–<30 mL), or larger effusion (≥30 mL). Associations with baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were assessed. Long-term mortality was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis, Cox regression models, and restricted cubic spline analyses. Results: Detectable pericardial effusion was present in 276 patients (58.7%), although larger effusions were uncommon (5.1%). Increasing pericardial effusion volume was associated with a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.001), higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (p = 0.004), and lower TAPSE/sPAP ratios (p = 0.007). In contrast, left ventricular ejection fraction and transvalvular gradients did not differ across effusion categories. During long-term follow-up, no significant differences in mortality were observed between pericardial effusion groups (log-rank p = 0.46). Pericardial effusion volume was not associated with mortality when analyzed as a continuous variable (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.996–1.01; p = 0.842), after logarithmic transformation (adjusted HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76–1.08; p = 0.293), or in restricted cubic spline analyses. Conclusions: AI-derived pericardial effusion volume identifies a hemodynamic phenotype characterized by atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, and impaired right ventricular–pulmonary arterial coupling. Despite these associations, pericardial effusion volume does not independently predict long-term mortality after TAVI, suggesting that it reflects cardiovascular congestion and remodeling rather than a prognostically relevant phenotype.