Waste tires as an alternative fuel in the cement industry offer multiple advantages, including reduced CO₂ emissions and decreased reliance on fossil fuels. In this study, a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted for cement clinker production with coal (CPC) as fuel and with waste tires as an alternative fuel (CPCT). The study adopted a “gate-to-gate” scope, with a functional unit of 1 ton of clinker. Environmental impacts were evaluated using the IMPACT 2002 + method. Global warming and non-renewable energy were the dominant impacts in cement clinker production. Compared to the CPC scenario, the CPCT scenario reduced the endpoint damage to resources, climate change, and human health by 19.91%, 2.30%, and 0.70%, respectively. However, the damage to ecosystem quality increased by 11.53%. When the waste tires substitution ratio increased from 5% to 20% according to scenario simulation results, the impacts on non-renewable energy and global warming dropped by 16.23% and 8.59%, respectively. Conversely, this higher substitution ratio exacerbated terrestrial acid/nutri (+10.75%), aquatic acidification (+9.70%), and respiratory inorganics (+5.76%). The results indicated a trend toward reduced reliance on coal and lower CO₂ emissions in the cement clinker production process through the substitution of waste tires. Nevertheless, the trade-off involved higher emissions of certain pollutants, most notably NO_x, leading to increased ecosystem-related impacts.

The textile dyeing and printing (TDP) industry in Zhejiang Province faces significant pressure to reduce conventional pollutants and carbon emissions. Dyeing and finishing (DF) are key links in energy consumption and pollutant emissions in the TDP industry. However, the trade-offs between pollution reduction and carbon mitigation remain poorly understood. This study evaluated five synergistic technology pathways using a hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. The pathways included low-carbon energy substitution, waste heat recovery, advanced wastewater treatment, intelligent process control, and integrated application. The IMPACT 2002+ method was used to quantify 7 environmental impact categories. The results showed that no single technology pathway achieved optimal performance across all categories. Scenario 3 (advanced wastewater treatment) reduced eutrophication potential by 54.97% but increased global warming potential by 18.00%. Scenario 5 (integrated application) achieved the best overall performance. It reduced non-renewable energy consumption by 30.90%, global warming potential by 32.69%, acidification potential by 26.08%, and eutrophication potential by 40.00%. The synergy coefficient of Scenario 5 was 1.08, indicating strong pollution-reduction synergy. Extrapolation to the provincial level showed reductions of 40% for COD, 39.76% for ammonia nitrogen, 40.78% for SO₂, 10.67% for NOx, and 14% for VOCs. These findings demonstrate that systematic technology integration can resolve the trade-offs inherent in individual pollution control measures under the conditions evaluated in this Zhejiang-based case study. This study provides scientific guidance for technology selection and policy formulation in the DF industry.