Background/Objectives: Metatypical basal cell carcinoma (MTBCC) is a rare and aggressive variant of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) characterised by overlapping histological features of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Owing to its increased propensity for local invasion, recurrence, and metastasis, MTBCC poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study aimed to characterise the epidemiological, histopathological, and clinical features of MTBCC and to evaluate temporal changes in tumour characteristics and aggressiveness before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 129 histologically confirmed MTBCC lesions diagnosed in the Pathology Department of the Mures Clinical County Hospital, Targu Mures, Romania, between January 2017 and December 2025. Demographic data, tumour location, histological subtypes, differentiation of the squamous component, aggressiveness parameters, and volumetric measurements of tumours and excision specimens were analysed. Volumetric analyses were restricted to cases with complete three-dimensional measurements. Statistical comparisons were performed across demographic variables and the following three time periods: pre-pandemic, pandemic, and post-pandemic. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 71 years, with a slight male predominance (p = 0.25) and a significant predominance of patients from urban areas (p < 0.001). Most tumours were located in the head and neck region. Mixed-type MTBCC was significantly associated with higher tumour aggressiveness (p = 0.0019) and with high-risk histological subtypes, particularly micronodular and adenoid–cystic variants. Tumour volume showed a significant inverse correlation with year of diagnosis (p = 0.0139; r = (−) 0.50), whereas excision specimen volume differed significantly according to year of diagnosis (p = 0.0425). Neither tumour volume nor excision specimen volume was associated with histopathological aggressiveness. Conclusions: Metatypical basal cell carcinoma is a rare skin malignancy in which biological behaviour appears to be determined primarily by histopathological architecture rather than tumour size. Mixed-type lesions were associated with significantly higher aggressiveness, underscoring the need for accurate histopathological assessment. These findings support a pathology-driven approach to management and emphasise the importance of adequate surgical treatment and long-term follow-up in patients with MTBCC.

Background/Objectives: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and represents the leading cause of NMSC-related deaths. Despite its growing global burden, comprehensive epidemiological and clinicopathological data from Easter Europe remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiological, clinical, histopathological, and surgical characteristics of cSCC diagnosed before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive observational study including 332 lesions diagnosed between January 2017 and December 2025 at the Clinical Pathology Department of the Mureș Clinical County Hospital. Demographic, epidemiological, topographic, histopathologic, surgical, and volumetric parameters were analyzed. Tumours were stratified into low-, high-, and very-high-risk categories according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria. Results: The cohort demonstrated a significant male predominance (n = 193 vs. n = 139; p = 0.0355), with females presenting a higher median age (77 vs. 75; p = 0.0489). Lesions were predominantly located in the head and neck region (n = 216; p < 0.0001), which was significantly associated with very-high-risk tumours (p = 0.0051). Low-risk tumours accounted for 62.35% of cases, while high-risk and very-high-risk lesions comprised 19.88% and 17.77%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Ulcerations were strongly associated with very-high-risk tumours (p < 0.0001). Poor differentiation was more frequent outside the head and neck region (p < 0.0001) and varied significantly across the pandemic periods (p = 0.0349). Tumoral and excision volumes were higher in very-high-risk (p = 0.0070; p = 0.0004) and ulcerated tumours (p < 0.001), with a peak in volume during the COVID-19 period (p < 0.0001). A decrease through the years of diagnosis was observed in tumoral volumes (r = −0.2295; p < 0.0001) and patients showed a weak positive correlation with diagnosis year (r = +0.13; p = 0.019). Conclusions: The study provides an epidemiological and clinicopathological characterization of cSCC within one of the largest Romanian cohorts to date. Tumour aggressiveness was primarily driven by histopathological and topographical features rather than demographic factors. While the COVID-19 pandemic did not induce persistent changes in tumour risk profiles or surgical outcomes, it influenced diagnosis timing and tumour burden. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating temporal and emerging systemic factors, such as pandemics, and infectious events, into future epidemiological models to improve preparedness, early detection, future treatment schemes, and risk stratification in cSCC.

Background/Objectives: Empathy is a fundamental component of patient-centered care and plays a critical role in the physician–patient relationship. This study aimed to evaluate empathy levels among undergraduate medical students at a medical university in Romania, examined from a Medical Humanities perspective, and to analyze how these scores are distributed according to gender, academic year, clinical stage, and direct experience with patient contact. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among 209 undergraduate medical students across all six academic years. Empathy levels were assessed using the Romanian-language version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy—Student Version (JSE-S). Differences in empathy scores were analyzed using independent samples t-tests and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) post hoc comparisons. Statistical significance was set at an alpha level of less than 0.05. Results: Internal consistency of the JSE-S total scale was good (Cronbach’s α = 0.829). The overall mean total JSE-S score was 107.34 ± 14.34. Female students demonstrated significantly higher empathy scores compared to male students (109.92 ± 13.10 versus 99.37 ± 15.20; t = 4.450; p < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 0.77). No statistically significant differences were found between preclinical and clinical stage students (106.84 ± 14.75 versus 108.98 ± 12.90; p = 0.363; Cohen’s d = −0.15), between students with and without direct patient contact (108.20 ± 14.14 versus 104.48 ± 14.78; p = 0.115; Cohen’s d = 0.26), or across the six academic years (F = 1.614; p = 0.158; partial η² = 0.038). Conclusions: Medical students demonstrated moderate-to-high empathy levels, with gender representing the only statistically significant demographic factor. The absence of major differences across academic-year cohorts and clinical exposure suggests that empathy levels were comparably represented across the different stages of training within this cross-sectional sample. These findings contribute descriptive data on empathy levels among Romanian medical students and highlight gender as the main factor associated with variation in empathy scores in this sample.