Alena V. V. Favorskaya

Dr. Alena V. V. Favorskaya

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2021 in Journal of Computational Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NKNikolay Khokhlov
Nikolay Khokhlov
AFAlena V. V. Favorskaya
Alena V. V. Favorskaya
VSVladislav Stetsyuk
Vladislav Stetsyuk
IMIvan Mitskovets
Ivan Mitskovets

1 April 2020 in Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAlena V. V. Favorskaya
Alena V. V. Favorskaya
NKNikolay Khokhlov
Nikolay Khokhlov
IPI. B. Petrov
I. B. Petrov
This work is devoted to the modification of the grid-characteristic numerical method. We propose using joint structured regular and curved computational grids to describe the complex geometric shape of objects and save computing resources. In subdomains, where possible, we propose use structured regular computational grids conformal with structured curved grids. Moreover, we use different calculation algorithms in subdomains with structured regular grids and with curved grids. The elastic and acoustic wave equations are also jointly solved in various subdomains of the integration domain for a more accurate description of the simulated model. We use the corresponding contact conditions at the boundaries between subdomains with different types of computational grids, different solved systems of equations, and different elastic and acoustic parameters of the media. We have proved in this paper the equivalence of using the contact condition of complete adhesion with the absence of an interface in the case of the same elastic and acoustic properties. The proposed modification of the grid-characteristic method was tested on the problems of studying the earthquake resistance of a bridge over a river and a bridge over a highway.

17 February 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
AFAlena V. V. Favorskaya
Alena V. V. Favorskaya
IPIgor B. Petrov
Igor B. Petrov

9 January 2019
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
AFAlena V. V. Favorskaya
Alena V. V. Favorskaya
ABAlina V. Breus
Alina V. Breus
BGBoris V. Galitskii
Boris V. Galitskii

28 August 2018 in Procedia Computer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAlena V. V. Favorskaya
Alena V. V. Favorskaya
VGVasily Golubev
Vasily Golubev
DGDaniil Grigorievyh
Daniil Grigorievyh
Recent researches have shown that the damaged areas, calculated using various failure criteria for materials with complex heterogeneous structure are not always consistent with physical experiments and with each other. In this paper, we compare two failure criteria, i.e. the principal stress criterion and the von Mises yield criterion. Also, we compare two models of destruction formation, i.e. the model of fractures and sand model. Using the wave dynamics analysis, we explain the difference in the calculated zones of destruction. We indicate what differences in elastic wave phenomena cause the difference in the calculated fracture zones. We assume that further study of the connection between wave phenomena and destruction of materials will allow to develop more precise failure criteria. To carry out the research, we applied numerical modeling of spatial dynamic elastic wave processes in a nuclear power plant and enclosing rocks. We use the grid-characteristic method on combined regular and structural hexahedral grids to describe the complex shape of the dome of the nuclear power plant with minimal computational costs. Moreover, in this work, we consider an approach for calculating the contribution of dynamic elastic wave phenomena to seismic stability of facilities. This technique can be especially useful in the development and testing of seismic insulation of buildings. We propose a failure formation model that takes into account the contribution of static loads and dynamic loads separately.

1 April 2016 in Numerical Analysis and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAlena V. V. Favorskaya
Alena V. V. Favorskaya
IPI. B. Petrov
I. B. Petrov