Anatomage Table 6, launched in fall 2018, is the latest software for users of the Anatomage Virtual Dissection Table. Anatomage Table 6 comprises numerous virtual anatomy dissection and study tools for use by anatomy students and instructors. This review provides an overview and assessment of Anatomage Table 6’s primary tools and advanced navigation features.
1 October 2020 in Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Libraries (UT Libraries) utilizes research guides as supplemental training resources, educational tools, and community enrichment aids to support health literacy. This article illustrates case studies of three UT Libraries research guides that provide consumer health information, breaking down each research guide’s development, facilitation, and purpose. As a training resource, the Cultural Competency Guide works to support the course curriculum. The Introduction to Health Sciences Research Guide serves as an educational tool by establishing foundational information for consumer health assimilation. Lastly, the Seed Library & Gardening Guide serves as a community enrichment aid to encourage healthy lifestyles and share food insecurity information that impacts campus and local communities.
The University of Tennessee’s Preston Medical Library (PML) collaborated with local libraries for outreach at a Remote Area Medical (RAM) event. Librarians staffed a resource table and distributed consumer health handouts, received and fulfilled health information requests, and administered the Newest Vital Sign, a health literacy assessment tool, to volunteers. Researchers analyzed completed health information requests and health literacy assessment results to better inform future outreach. Collaboration at this event built relationships, particularly with the University of Tennessee Knoxville Libraries, for future community events.
Background/Objectives: Among young children, self-reported dietary assessment has unique challenges, limiting ability to accurately assess intake. This review describes methods used to support accuracy of self-reported dietary intake, including support tools, proxy reporting, and methods to determine diet misreporting and its prevalence, for assessing energy intake (EI) among young children (2–12 years). Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, relevant databases were searched in October 2024 and November 2025. Studies published since 2000, using a self-reported dietary assessment methodology and reporting on total EI among children between the ages of 2 and 12 years, were included. Two reviewers completed title and abstract screening. After achieving a 94% inter-rater agreement on full-text review of a random sample of 20% of texts, the remaining full texts were reviewed by a single reviewer. Results: The 52 included articles reported 24-h dietary recalls (n = 23) and food records (n = 14) as the most common individual assessment methods. The use of at least one support tool (i.e., visual aids, household utensils) was commonly reported (n = 36); however, using multiple support tools (n = 13) or technology-based supports (n = 1) was less common. Proxy reporting was frequently reported (n = 31) and occurred in all studies in which children were ≤ 5 years; however, few studies used multiple-proxy reporters (n = 6). A limited number of studies (n = 9; 17%) reported that caregivers and children were trained for the dietary assessment, but none actually described in detail what the training entailed for using support tools or proxy reporting. Only 40% of studies reported procedures for identifying dietary misreporting; among those that did, methodologies varied, yet all identified evidence of dietary misreporting. Conclusions: Self-reported dietary assessment used varying strategies to support assessment accuracy. Evaluating which support tool, combination of support tools, or the use of proxy or multiple-proxy reporters, relative to the burden that may be associated with their use, on increasing accuracy of self-reported dietary intake is needed. Additionally, details on implemented methodologies need to be consistently reported to support replication.