Alan Reynolds

Dr. Alan Reynolds

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 December 2020 in Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VLVince J. Lai
Vince J. Lai
ARAlan Reynolds
Alan Reynolds
MKMichael Kindya
Michael Kindya
JKJohn Konicek
John Konicek
SASam Akhavan
Sam Akhavan
Purpose: To biomechanically evaluate the use of the suture augmentation construct at time 0 of ACL reconstruction. Methods: Eighty porcine knees underwent ACL reconstruction using 2 techniques for graft fixation: a single suspensory construct (SSC), performed with a femoral button and tibial interference screw; and a double suspensory construct (DSC), with a femoral and tibial button. Each fixation technique was performed on 40 porcine knees divided into 4 subgroups. The first group had a nonaugmented ACL reconstruction, the second group had an ACL reconstruction with suture augmentation, and the third and fourth groups were the same as the first and second groups, with the graft resected 80% to simulate graft weakening. Ultimate load, yield load, stiffness, cyclic displacement values, and mode of failure were recorded for each graft. Results: In a weakened graft model with 80% graft resection, there was a significant increase in ultimate strength ( P < .001), yield strength ( P < .001), and cyclic displacement ( P < .001) with suture augmentation. There was no significant increase in stiffness with suture augmentation with either construct ( P = .278). In the setting of an intact graft, there were no differences in either SSC or DCS groups with or without suture augmentation. Conclusions: The addition of a suture to ACL reconstruction techniques resulted in minimal changes in baseline biomechanical characteristics while improving ultimate load, yield load, and cyclic displacement in a weakened graft model. Clinical Relevance: Suture augmentation of ACL reconstruction may confer improved integrity of the graft and is worth consideration and future clinical study.

15 April 2025 in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BLBradley J Lauck
Bradley J Lauck
JCJackson M. Cathey
Jackson M. Cathey
NANathan C. Adams
Nathan C. Adams
ARAlan Reynolds
Alan Reynolds
NTNicholas A. Trasolini
Nicholas A. Trasolini
JLJelle P. van der List
Jelle P. van der List

1 December 2015 in Journal of Bone Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BKBarry E. Kenneally
Barry E. Kenneally
CGChristina J. Gutowski
Christina J. Gutowski
ARAlan Reynolds
Alan Reynolds
WMWilliam B. Morrison
William B. Morrison
JAJohn A. Abraham
John A. Abraham
To investigate the utility of opposed-phase magnetic resonance imaging (OP MRI) in differentiating malignant from benign bone lesions. MRI scans of musculoskeletal lesions including opposed-phase imaging sequences were reviewed by both an experienced musculoskeletal attending radiologist, and a second year radiology resident. The change in signal from IP to OP images was measured. The reviewers' evaluation of the lesions based on T1 and T2-weighted images was compared to their evaluation with inclusion of the OP sequences. Twenty-seven lesions in bone were analyzed: 4 malignant primary bone lesions, 3 malignant soft tissue lesions to bone, 3 metastases from visceral malignancies, and 17 benign bone lesions. Benign lesions of bone dropped in signal on OP imaging by an average of 37.1%. Five of the benign lesions decreased in signal by less than 20%, and two increased. Malignant bone lesions dropped in signal by an average of 0.69% with one of the ten lesions showing a greater than 20% drop. When OP sequences were included, concern for malignancy decreased in benign lesions and increased in malignant lesions, for both the resident and attending. Compared with standard MRI, inclusion of these sequences increased the overall confidence in diagnosis for both reviewers. Opposed-phase imaging is helpful in differentiating benign from malignant lesions in bone. Confidence in diagnosis rose for both the attending and the resident as result of the inclusion of OP sequences.

31 August 2020 in The Journal of Knee Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAlan Reynolds
Alan Reynolds
MGMariano Garay
Mariano Garay
SLScott Lynch
Scott Lynch
KBKevin P. Black
Kevin P. Black
RGRobert A. Gallo
Robert A. Gallo
The incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been reported in up to 10.9% of patients undergoing knee arthroscopy without chemoprohylaxis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a chemoprophylaxis protocol in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. A retrospective review of prospectively enrolled patients in a new institutional VTE prophylaxis protocol identified all patients undergoing knee arthroscopy during a 5-year period. This risk-based chemoprophylaxis protocol was instituted based on the Caprini model: patients at more than minimal risk were prescribed enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 3 weeks, while all others were instructed to take aspirin 325 mg twice daily. The primary outcome measure was incidence of VTE within 60 days postoperatively. Demographic characteristics and other risk factors for VTE were also recorded, as well as any postoperative complications. Among the 1,276 knee arthroscopies, there were 26 VTE events (2.0%), including 23 with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), two pulmonary emboli (PE), and one patient with both DVT and PE. There were no deaths or complications requiring hospitalization or reoperation. The VTE diagnosis occurred at, on average, 9 days postoperatively. Patients in the high-risk group treated with enoxaparin had a lower VTE incidence (1.49%) than those instructed to take aspirin (2.0%); p = 0.75. Those undergoing an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction had the highest VTE incidence (2.87%). This study found that a chemoprophylaxis protocol with preferential use of aspirin or low–molecular weight heparin based on risk factors reduced the VTE incidence below to 2.0%, which is lower than most historical controls.

8 March 2024 in Arthroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BLBradley J. Lauck
Bradley J. Lauck
ARAlan Reynolds
Alan Reynolds
JLJelle P. van der List
Jelle P. van der List
KDKyle Deivert
Kyle Deivert
RDRobert S. Dean
Robert S. Dean
BWBrian R. Waterman
Brian R. Waterman

14 September 2024 in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKelsey M. Healy
Kelsey M. Healy
JRJacob Ritter
Jacob Ritter
EBEmily Barr
Emily Barr
JCJessica L. Churchill
Jessica L. Churchill
NTNicholas A. Trasolini
Nicholas A. Trasolini
ARAlan Reynolds
Alan Reynolds
Purpose of Review: The aim of this review is to aggregate currently available literature as it pertains to treating surgical shoulder pathology in patients with osteoporosis. Recent Findings: Emerging data surrounding perioperative use of anti-osteoporosis medications for patients undergoing shoulder surgery have not shown definitively favorable or unfavorable outcomes. Similar evaluations in animal studies have shown promising results as a biologic augment to tendon and bone healing, especially with newer, anabolic agents. Summary: The mainstay of bone health management remains pre-operative evaluation, using opportunistic radiographic and CT based validated measurements, along with optimization of risk factors. Surgical techniques continue to incorporate implants that perform well in osteopenic bone. Promising pre-clinical studies have identified anabolic anti-osteoporosis medications as viable biologic augments to shoulder surgery, which has not been borne out in any clinical studies at this time.