The ureteral access sheath (UAS) has been a boon and a bane in flexible ureteroscopy (FURS), with its merits and demerits well established. Its design and dimensions were instrumental in reshaping the way flexible scopes were used and were key adjuncts to establishing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) as a standard of care in the endourological management of renal stones. With the ever-changing landscape of RIRS over the decades shaped by technological advancements in lasers and flexible scopes, the UAS has also continuously evolved. The utility of suction in endourology has recently changed the way RIRS is performed and is a game changer for FURS outcomes. With strong clinical and experimental evidence to support its use, the UAS has undergone a transformative change in the recent past, with its ability to monitor intrarenal pressure and provide a superior vacuum-cleaner effect that improves the trifecta of RIRS, namely an improved single-stage stone-free rate (SFR), minimise complications, and reduce reinterventions. Our comprehensive review outlines the key clinical and experimental evidence and traces the developments that were key to modifying the traditional UAS into a flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS) and highlights how the design and modifications, in turn, influence the ability to push the boundaries of RIRS.

Background: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is currently a first-line treatment option for men with localized prostate cancer (PCa), at least 10 years of life expectancy, and candidate for curative treatment. We performed a scoping review to evaluate the role of artificial intelligence (AI) on RARP for PCa. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using EMBASE, PubMed, and Scopus. Only English papers were accepted. The PICOS (Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome Study type) model was used; P: adult men with PCa undergoing RARP; I: use of AI; C: none; O: preoperative planning improvement and postoperative outcomes; S: prospective and retrospective studies. Results: Seventeen papers were included, dealing with prediction of positive surgical margins/extraprostatic extension, biochemical recurrence, patient’s outcomes, intraoperative superimposition of magnetic resonance images to identify and locate lesions for nerve-sparing surgery, identification and labeling of surgical steps, and quality of surgery. All studies found improving outcomes in procedures employing AI. Conclusions: The integration of AI in RARP represents a transformative advancement in surgical practice, augmenting surgical precision, enhancing decision-making processes and facilitating personalized patient care. This holds immense potential to improve surgical outcomes and teaching, and mitigate complications. This should be balanced against the current costs of implementation of robotic platforms with such a technology.