The important variable of horizontal visibility within forest stands is gaining increasing attention in studies and applications involving terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), photographic measurements of forest structure, and autonomous mobility. We investigated distributions of visibility distance, open arc length, and shaded arc length in three mature forest stands. Our analysis was based (1) on tree position maps and TLS data collected in 2013 and 2019 with three different scanners, and (2) on simulated digital twins of the forest stands, constructed with two pattern-generation models incorporating commonly used indices of tree position clumping. The model simulations were found to yield values for visibility almost identical to those calculated from the corresponding tree location maps. The TLS measurements, however, were found to diverge notably from the simulations. Overall, the probability of free line of sight was found to decrease exponentially with distance to target, and the probabilities of open arc length and shaded arc length were found to decrease and increase, respectively, with distance from the observer. The TLS measurements, which are sensitive to forest understory vegetation, were found to indicate increased visibility after vegetation removal. Our chosen visibility prediction models support practical forest management, being based on common forest inventory parameters and on widely used forest structure indices.

Shoreline determination is fundamental to coastal research, spatial planning, and legal boundary delineation but remains challenging in low-relief coastal areas where small sea-level variations can produce substantial horizontal shoreline displacements. This study compares shoreline determination methods based on tide gauge (TG) observations, LiDAR data, Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and Sentinel-2 optical satellite imagery using the low-relief coast of Pärnu Bay, Estonia, as a case study. The comparison was based on shorelines derived from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery acquired on selected common acquisition dates within the 2015–2025 study period, rather than on a temporally continuous annual dataset, and compared with temporally matched LiDAR-derived shorelines extracted from a Digital Terrain Model (DTM) generated from a 2021 LiDAR survey. The LiDAR-derived shorelines were extracted using the mean sea level (MSL) observed at the Pärnu and Häädemeeste TGs at the satellite overpass time, while the satellite-derived shorelines were additionally validated against RTK GNSS measurements. The results demonstrate that the evaluated methods produce substantially different shoreline positions. Sentinel-2-derived shorelines generally corresponded more closely to the temporally matched LiDAR-derived shorelines than Sentinel-1-derived shorelines and most accurately represented the instantaneous land–water boundary during field validation. These findings demonstrate that different shoreline determination methods represent different shoreline definitions. Consequently, shoreline datasets should be interpreted according to their intended purpose rather than treated as directly interchangeable.