Antibodies raised against selected antigens over-expressed at the cell surface of malignant cells have been chemically conjugated to protein toxin domains to obtain immunotoxins (ITs) able to selectively kill cancer cells. Since latest generation immunotoxins are composed of a toxic domain genetically fused to antibody fragment(s) which confer on the IT target selective specificity, we rescued from the hydridoma 4KB128, a recombinant single-chain variable fragment (scFv) targeting CD22, a marker antigen expressed by B-lineage leukaemias and lymphomas. We constructed several ITs using two enzymatic toxins both able to block protein translation, one of bacterial origin (a truncated version of Pseudomonas exotoxin A, PE40) endowed with EF-2 ADP-ribosylation activity, the other being the plant ribosome-inactivating protein saporin, able to specifically depurinate 23/26/28S ribosomal RNA. PE40 was selected because it has been widely used for the construction of recombinant ITs that have already undergone evaluation in clinical trials. Saporin has also been evaluated clinically and has recently been expressed successfully at high levels in a Pichia pastoris expression system. The aim of the present study was to evaluate optimal microbial expression of various IT formats. An anti-CD22 scFv termed 4KB was obtained which showed the expected binding activity which was also internalized by CD22+ target cells and was also competed for by the parental monoclonal CD22 antibody. Several fusion constructs were designed and expressed either in E. coli or in Pichia pastoris and the resulting fusion proteins affinity-purified. Protein synthesis inhibition assays were performed on CD22+ human Daudi cells and showed that the selected ITs were active, having IC50 values (concentration inhibiting protein synthesis by 50% relative to controls) in the nanomolar range. We undertook a systematic comparison between the performance of the different fusion constructs, with respect to yields in E. coli or P. pastoris expression systems and also with regard to each constructs specific killing efficacy. Our results confirm that E. coli is the system of choice for the expression of recombinant fusion toxins of bacterial origin whereas we further demonstrate that saporin-based ITs are best expressed and recovered from P. pastoris cultures after yeast codon-usage optimization.

A critical problem in studying ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs) lies in the very limited possibility to produce them in heterologous systems. In fact, their inherent toxicity for the producing organism nearly always prevents their recombinant expression. In this study, we designed, expressed and characterized an engineered form of the RIP saporin (SapVSAV), bearing a C-terminal extra sequence that is recognized and bound by the second PDZ domain from murine PTP-BL protein (PDZ2). The co-expression of SapVSAV and PDZ2 in Escherichia coli BL21 cells greatly enhances the production of the toxin in a soluble form. The increase of production was surprisingly not due to protection from bacterial intoxication, but may arise from a stabilization effect of PDZ2 on the toxin molecule during biosynthesis. We found that once purified, SapVSAV is stable but is not toxic to free ribosomes, while it is fully active against human cancer cells. This strategy of co-expression of a toxin moiety and a soluble PDZ domain may represent a new system to increase the production of recombinant toxic proteins and could allow the selection of new extra sequences to target PDZ domains inside specific mammalian cellular domains.

The production of therapeutic recombinant toxins requires careful host cell selection. Bacteria, yeast, and mammalian cells are common choices, but no universal solution exists. Achieving the delicate balance in toxin production is crucial due to potential self-intoxication. Recombinant toxins from various sources find applications in antimicrobials, biotechnology, cancer drugs, and vaccines. “Toxin-based therapy” targets diseased cells using three strategies. Targeted cancer therapy, like antibody–toxin conjugates, fusion toxins, or “suicide gene therapy”, can selectively eliminate cancer cells, leaving healthy cells unharmed. Notable toxins from various biological sources may be used as full-length toxins, as plant (saporin) or animal (melittin) toxins, or as isolated domains that are typical of bacterial toxins, including Pseudomonas Exotoxin A (PE) and diphtheria toxin (DT). This paper outlines toxin expression methods and system advantages and disadvantages, emphasizing host cell selection’s critical role.

The demonstration of the first enzyme-based electrode to detect glucose, published in 1967 by S. J. Updike and G. P. Hicks, kicked off huge efforts in building sensors where biomolecules are exploited as native or modified to achieve new or improved sensing performances. In this growing area, bionanotechnology has become prominent in demonstrating how nanomaterials can be tailored into responsive nanostructures using biomolecules and integrated into sensors to detect different analytes, e.g., biomarkers, antibiotics, toxins and organic compounds as well as whole cells and microorganisms with very high sensitivity. Accounting for the natural affinity between biomolecules and almost every type of nanomaterials and taking advantage of well-known crosslinking strategies to stabilize the resulting hybrid nanostructures, biosensors with broad applications and with unprecedented low detection limits have been realized. This review depicts a comprehensive collection of the most recent biochemical and biophysical strategies for building hybrid devices based on bioconjugated nanomaterials and their applications in label-free detection for diagnostics, food and environmental analysis.

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) are the most prevalent age-associated disorders, characterized by progressive neuronal loss and cognitive decline. Mitochondrial dysfunction is strictly associated with NDs and represent one of the hallmarks of these disorders, with neurological syndromes frequently representing the primary clinical manifestations of mitochondrial abnormalities. As central regulators of cellular bioenergetics, mitochondria play a pivotal role in both the physiological maintenance and pathogenesis of disease by different regulatory approaches. One of these, microRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small non-coding RNAs, are well-established regulators of gene expression across different biological pathways. These miRNAs were usually investigated within the cytoplasmic context, but recent discoveries have revealed the presence of these miRNAs in different parts of mitochondria, where they contribute to the regulation of gene expression and metabolic activity. These mitochondrial-localized miRNAs, termed mito-MiRNA, may originate from either nuclear or mitochondrial genomes and have been shown to modulate the translational machinery of the cells. Despite extensive research on cytoplasmic miRNAs, the functional roles of mito-MiRNA remain poorly understood, particularly in the context of neurodegenerative disorders. Based on these findings, this review aims to synthesize emerging evidence on the involvement of mito-MiRNA in in one of most prevalent neurodegenerative diseases—Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Neurological disorders and central nervous system (CNS) injuries, including neurodegenerative diseases, ischemic stroke, and traumatic brain injury, represent a major cause of disability worldwide. Despite their diverse etiologies, these conditions share common pathological mechanisms, including oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, excitotoxicity, and impaired regenerative capacity, which collectively contribute to progressive neuronal loss and limited functional recovery. Although nanotechnology has traditionally been investigated as a strategy to improve drug delivery to the CNS, growing evidence indicates that many nanomaterials possess intrinsic biological activities that extend beyond their role as passive carriers. In this review, we summarize the principal classes of neuroprotective nanomaterials and discuss the molecular and cellular mechanisms through which they modulate oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and tissue regeneration. We further examine their applications in neurodegenerative diseases, ischemic stroke, traumatic brain injury, and peripheral nerve injury, highlighting their emerging role in bridging neuroprotection and neurorepair. Importantly, we propose a conceptual shift from the conventional material-based classification of nanomaterials toward a function-based framework that categorizes nanotherapeutics according to their predominant biological activities, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, neurogenic, synaptogenic/neuroplastic, regenerative, and multifunctional effects. Finally, we discuss the major challenges associated with clinical translation and future perspectives for the development of next-generation nanotherapeutics. This function-based perspective may provide a useful framework for guiding the rational design of innovative strategies aimed at promoting functional recovery following CNS injury.