Michael R. Dores

Prof. Dr. Michael R. Dores

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 April 2010 in British Journal of Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
USUnice Jk Soh
Unice Jk Soh
MDMichael R. Dores
Michael R. Dores
BCBuxin Chen
Buxin Chen
JTJOANN TREJO
JOANN TREJO
The family of G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitutes the largest class of signalling receptors in the human genome, controlling vast physiological responses and are the target of many drugs. After activation, GPCRs are rapidly desensitized by phosphorylation and β‐arrestin binding. Most classic GPCRs are internalized through a clathrin, dynamin and β‐arrestin‐dependent pathway and then recycled back to the cell surface or sorted to lysosomes for degradation. Given the vast number and diversity of GPCRs, different mechanisms are likely to exist to precisely regulate the magnitude, duration and spatial aspects of receptor signalling. The G protein‐coupled protease‐activated receptors (PARs) provide elegant examples of GPCRs that are regulated by distinct desensitization and endocytic sorting mechanisms, processes that are critically important for the spatial and temporal fidelity of PAR signalling. PARs are irreversibly activated through proteolytic cleavage and transmit cellular responses to extracellular proteases. Activated PAR1 internalizes through a clathrin‐ and dynamin‐dependent pathway independent of β‐arrestins. Interestingly, PAR1 is basally ubiquitinated and deubiquitinated after activation and traffics from endosomes to lysosomes independent of ubiquitination. In contrast, β‐arrestins mediate activated PAR2 internalization and function as scaffolds that promote signalling from endocytic vesicles. Moreover, activated PAR2 is modified with ubiquitin, which facilitates lysosomal degradation. Activated PARs also adopt distinct active conformations that signal to diverse effectors and are likely regulated by different mechanisms. Thus, the identification of the molecular machinery important for PAR signal regulation will enable the development of new strategies to manipulate receptor signalling and will provide novel targets for the development of drugs.

30 April 2012 in Journal of Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMichael R. Dores
Michael R. Dores
BCBuxin Chen
Buxin Chen
HLHuilan Lin
Huilan Lin
USUnice J.K. Soh
Unice J.K. Soh
MPMay M. Paing
May M. Paing
JTJOANN TREJO
JOANN TREJO
The sorting of signaling receptors to lysosomes is an essential regulatory process in mammalian cells. During degradation, receptors are modified with ubiquitin and sorted by endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT)–0, –I, –II, and –III complexes into intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) of multivesicular bodies (MVBs). However, it remains unclear whether a single universal mechanism mediates MVB sorting of all receptors. We previously showed that protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), a G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) for thrombin, is internalized after activation and sorted to lysosomes independent of ubiquitination and the ubiquitin-binding ESCRT components hepatocyte growth factor–regulated tyrosine kinase substrate and Tsg101. In this paper, we report that PAR1 sorted to ILVs of MVBs through an ESCRT-III–dependent pathway independent of ubiquitination. We further demonstrate that ALIX, a charged MVB protein 4–ESCRT-III interacting protein, bound to a YPX3L motif of PAR1 via its central V domain to mediate lysosomal degradation. This study reveals a novel MVB/lysosomal sorting pathway for signaling receptors that bypasses the requirement for ubiquitination and ubiquitin-binding ESCRTs and may be applicable to a subset of GPCRs containing YPXnL motifs.

1 July 2008 in Molecular Biology of the Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LMLymarie Maldonado-Báez
Lymarie Maldonado-Báez
MDMichael R. Dores
Michael R. Dores
EPEdward M. Perkins
Edward M. Perkins
TDTheodore G. Drivas
Theodore G. Drivas
LHLinda Hicke
Linda Hicke
BWBeverly Wendland
Beverly Wendland
The spatial and temporal regulation of the interactions among the ∼60 proteins required for endocytosis is under active investigation in many laboratories. We have identified the interaction between monomeric clathrin adaptors and endocytic scaffold proteins as a critical prerequisite for the recruitment and/or spatiotemporal dynamics of endocytic proteins at early and late stages of internalization. Quadruple deletion yeast cells (ΔΔΔΔ) lacking four putative adaptors, Ent1/2 and Yap1801/2 (homologues of epsin and AP180/CALM proteins), with a plasmid encoding Ent1 or Yap1802 mutants, have defects in endocytosis and growth at 37°C. Live-cell imaging revealed that the dynamics of the early- and late-acting scaffold proteins Ede1 and Pan1, respectively, depend upon adaptor interactions mediated by adaptor asparagine-proline-phenylalanine motifs binding to scaffold Eps15 homology domains. These results suggest that adaptor/scaffold interactions regulate transitions from early to late events and that clathrin adaptor/scaffold protein interaction is essential for clathrin-mediated endocytosis.

1 November 2011 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BCBuxin Chen
Buxin Chen
MDMichael R. Dores
Michael R. Dores
NGNeil Grimsey
Neil Grimsey
ICIsabel Canto
Isabel Canto
BBBreann L. Barker
Breann L. Barker
JTJOANN TREJO
JOANN TREJO
Signaling by protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) for thrombin, is regulated by desensitization and internalization. PAR1 desensitization is mediated by β-arrestins, like most classic GPCRs. In contrast, internalization of PAR1 occurs through a clathrin- and dynamin-dependent pathway independent of β-arrestins. PAR1 displays two modes of internalization. Constitutive internalization of unactivated PAR1 is mediated by the clathrin adaptor protein complex-2 (AP-2), where the μ2-adaptin subunit binds directly to a tyrosine-based motif localized within the receptor C-tail domain. However, AP-2 depletion only partially inhibits agonist-induced internalization of PAR1, suggesting a function for other clathrin adaptors in this process. Here, we now report that AP-2 and epsin-1 are both critical mediators of agonist-stimulated PAR1 internalization. We show that ubiquitination of PAR1 and the ubiquitin-interacting motifs of epsin-1 are required for epsin-1-dependent internalization of activated PAR1. In addition, activation of PAR1 promotes epsin-1 de-ubiquitination, which may increase its endocytic adaptor activity to facilitate receptor internalization. AP-2 also regulates activated PAR1 internalization via recognition of distal C-tail phosphorylation sites rather than the canonical tyrosine-based motif. Thus, AP-2 and epsin-1 are both required to promote efficient internalization of activated PAR1 and recognize discrete receptor sorting signals. This study defines a new pathway for internalization of mammalian GPCRs.

8 December 2009 in Traffic
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMichael R. Dores
Michael R. Dores
JSJoshua D. Schnell
Joshua D. Schnell
LMLymarie Maldonado‐Baez
Lymarie Maldonado‐Baez
BWBeverly Wendland
Beverly Wendland
LHLinda Hicke
Linda Hicke
The formation of a primary endocytic vesicle is a dynamic process involving the transient organization of adaptor and scaffold proteins at the plasma membrane. Epsins and Eps15‐like proteins are ubiquitin‐binding proteins that act early in this process. The yeast epsins, Ent1 and Ent2, carry functional ubiquitin‐interacting motifs (UIMs), whereas the yeast Eps15‐like protein, Ede1, has a C‐terminal ubiquitin‐associated (UBA) domain. Analysis of mutants lacking early endocytic adaptors reveals that the ubiquitin‐binding domains (UBDs) of Ent2 and Ede1 are likely to function primarily to mediate protein–protein interactions between components of the early endocytic machinery. Cells that lack epsin and Ede1 UBDs are able to internalize activated, ubiquitinated receptors. Furthermore, under conditions in which epsin UIMs are important for receptor internalization, receptors internalized via both ubiquitin‐dependent and ubiquitin‐independent signals require the UIMs, indicating that UIM function is not restricted to ubiquitinated receptors. Epsin UIMs share function with non‐UBD protein–protein interaction motifs in Ent2 and Ede1, and the Ede1 UBA domain appears to negatively regulate interactions between endocytic proteins. Together, our results suggest that the ubiquitin‐binding domains within the yeast epsin Ent2 and Ede1 are involved in the formation and regulation of the endocytic network.

15 September 2012 in Molecular Biology of the Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDMichael R. Dores
Michael R. Dores
MPMay M. Paing
May M. Paing
HLHuilan Lin
Huilan Lin
WMWilliam A. Montagne
William A. Montagne
AMAdriano Marchese
Adriano Marchese
TMTerry Magnuson
Terry Magnuson
The sorting of signaling receptors within the endocytic system is important for appropriate cellular responses. After activation, receptors are trafficked to early endosomes and either recycled or sorted to lysosomes and degraded. Most receptors trafficked to lysosomes are modified with ubiquitin and recruited into an endosomal subdomain enriched in hepatocyte growth factor–regulated tyrosine kinase substrate (HRS), a ubiquitin-binding component of the endosomal-sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery, and then sorted into intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) of multivesicular bodies (MVBs)/lysosomes. However, not all receptors use ubiquitin or the canonical ESCRT machinery to sort to MVBs/lysosomes. This is exemplified by protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1), a G protein–coupled receptor for thrombin, which sorts to lysosomes independent of ubiquitination and HRS. We recently showed that the adaptor protein ALIX binds to PAR1, recruits ESCRT-III, and mediates receptor sorting to ILVs of MVBs. However, the mechanism that initiates PAR1 sorting at the early endosome is not known. We now report that the adaptor protein complex-3 (AP-3) regulates PAR1 ubiquitin-independent sorting to MVBs through an ALIX-dependent pathway. AP-3 binds to a PAR1 cytoplasmic tail–localized tyrosine-based motif and mediates PAR1 lysosomal degradation independent of ubiquitination. Moreover, AP-3 facilitates PAR1 interaction with ALIX, suggesting that AP-3 functions before PAR1 engagement of ALIX and MVB/lysosomal sorting.