Ken Mills

Prof. Ken Mills

Queen's University Belfast
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

46Years (1981-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 May 2010 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
THTorsten Haferlach
Torsten Haferlach
AKAlexander Kohlmann
Alexander Kohlmann
LWLothar Wieczorek
Lothar Wieczorek
GBGiuseppe Basso
Giuseppe Basso
GKGeertruy Te Kronnie
Geertruy Te Kronnie
RFRobin Foà
Robin Foà
Purpose: The Microarray Innovations in Leukemia study assessed the clinical utility of gene expression profiling as a single test to subtype leukemias into conventional categories of myeloid and lymphoid malignancies. Methods: The investigation was performed in 11 laboratories across three continents and included 3,334 patients. An exploratory retrospective stage I study was designed for biomarker discovery and generated whole-genome expression profiles from 2,143 patients with leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. The gene expression profiling–based diagnostic accuracy was further validated in a prospective second study stage of an independent cohort of 1,191 patients. Results: On the basis of 2,096 samples, the stage I study achieved 92.2% classification accuracy for all 18 distinct classes investigated (median specificity of 99.7%). In a second cohort of 1,152 prospectively collected patients, a classification scheme reached 95.6% median sensitivity and 99.8% median specificity for 14 standard subtypes of acute leukemia (eight acute lymphoblastic leukemia and six acute myeloid leukemia classes, n = 693). In 29 (57%) of 51 discrepant cases, the microarray results had outperformed routine diagnostic methods. Conclusion: Gene expression profiling is a robust technology for the diagnosis of hematologic malignancies with high accuracy. It may complement current diagnostic algorithms and could offer a reliable platform for patients who lack access to today's state-of-the-art diagnostic work-up. Our comprehensive gene expression data set will be submitted to the public domain to foster research focusing on the molecular understanding of leukemias.

11 March 2012 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSTino Schenk
Tino Schenk
WCWeihsu Claire Chen
Weihsu Claire Chen
SGStefanie Göllner
Stefanie Göllner
LHLouise Howell
Louise Howell
LJLiqing Jin
Liqing Jin
AZArthur Zelent
Arthur Zelent

14 December 2006 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PEP A S Evans
P A S Evans
CPCh Pott
Ch Pott
PGP J T A Groenen
P J T A Groenen
GSG Salles
G Salles
FDF Davi
F Davi
JCJose Cabecadas
Jose Cabecadas
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assessment of clonal immunoglobulin (Ig) and T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangements is an important diagnostic tool in mature B-cell neoplasms. However, lack of standardized PCR protocols resulting in a high level of false negativity has hampered comparability of data in previous clonality studies. In order to address these problems, 22 European laboratories investigated the Ig/TCR rearrangement patterns as well as t(14;18) and t(11;14) translocations of 369 B-cell malignancies belonging to five WHO-defined entities using the standardized BIOMED-2 multiplex PCR tubes accompanied by international pathology panel review. B-cell clonality was detected by combined use of the IGH and IGK multiplex PCR assays in all 260 definitive cases of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=56), mantle cell lymphoma (n=54), marginal zone lymphoma (n=41) and follicular lymphoma (n=109). Two of 109 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma showed no detectable clonal marker. The use of these techniques to assign cell lineage should be treated with caution as additional clonal TCR gene rearrangements were frequently detected in all disease categories. Our study indicates that the BIOMED-2 multiplex PCR assays provide a powerful strategy for clonality assessment in B-cell malignancies resulting in high Ig clonality detection rates particularly when IGH and IGK strategies are combined.

1 August 2008 in British Journal of Haematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAlexander Kohlmann
Alexander Kohlmann
TKThomas J. Kipps
Thomas J. Kipps
LRLaura Z. Rassenti
Laura Z. Rassenti
JDJames R. Downing
James R. Downing
SSSheila A. Shurtleff
Sheila A. Shurtleff
THTorsten Haferlach
Torsten Haferlach
Summary: Gene expression profiling has the potential to enhance current methods for the diagnosis of haematological malignancies. Here, we present data on 204 analyses from an international standardization programme that was conducted in 11 laboratories as a prephase to the Microarray Innovations in LEukemia (MILE) study. Each laboratory prepared two cell line samples, together with three replicate leukaemia patient lysates in two distinct stages: (i) a 5‐d course of protocol training, and (ii) independent proficiency testing. Unsupervised, supervised, and r2 correlation analyses demonstrated that microarray analysis can be performed with remarkably high intra‐laboratory reproducibility and with comparable quality and reliability.

25 January 2007 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alex TonksAlex Tonks
Alex Tonks
RHR Hills
R Hills
PWP White
P White
BRB Rosie
B Rosie
Ken MillsKen Mills
Ken Mills
RDR L Darley
R L Darley
CD200 as a prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukaemia

30 July 2009 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ken MillsKen Mills
Ken Mills
AKAlexander Kohlmann
Alexander Kohlmann
PWP. Mickey Williams
P. Mickey Williams
LWLothar Wieczorek
Lothar Wieczorek
WLWei-Min Liu
Wei-Min Liu
THTorsten Haferlach
Torsten Haferlach
The diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) currently relies primarily on the morphologic assessment of the patient's bone marrow and peripheral blood cells. Moreover, prognostic scoring systems rely on observer-dependent assessments of blast percentage and dysplasia. Gene expression profiling could enhance current diagnostic and prognostic systems by providing a set of standardized, objective gene signatures. Within the Microarray Innovations in LEukemia study, a diagnostic classification model was investigated to distinguish the distinct subclasses of pediatric and adult leukemia, as well as MDS. Overall, the accuracy of the diagnostic classification model for subtyping leukemia was approximately 93%, but this was not reflected for the MDS samples giving only approximately 50% accuracy. Discordant samples of MDS were classified either into acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or “none-of-the-targets” (neither leukemia nor MDS) categories. To clarify the discordant results, all submitted 174 MDS samples were externally reviewed, although this did not improve the molecular classification results. However, a significant correlation was noted between the AML and “none-of-the-targets” categories and prognosis, leading to a prognostic classification model to predict for time-dependent probability of leukemic transformation. The prognostic classification model accurately discriminated patients with a rapid transformation to AML within 18 months from those with more indolent disease.