Diego Alvarez

Dr. Diego Alvarez

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 August 2012 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Juan Carlos AlvarezJuan Carlos Alvarez
Juan Carlos Alvarez
DADiego Alvarez
Diego Alvarez
Antonio Miguel Lopez RodriguezAntonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez
Antonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez
RRRafael Corsino Gonzalez De Los Reyes
Rafael Corsino Gonzalez De Los Reyes
We present a waist-worn personal navigation system based on inertial measurement units. The device makes use of the human bipedal pattern to reduce position errors. We describe improved algorithms, based on detailed description of the heel strike biomechanics and its translation to accelerations of the body waist to estimate the periods of zero velocity, the step length, and the heading estimation. The experimental results show that we are able to support pedestrian navigation with the high-resolution positioning required for most applications.

22 January 2019 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Antonio Miguel Lopez RodriguezAntonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez
Antonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez
Juan Carlos AlvarezJuan Carlos Alvarez
Juan Carlos Alvarez
DADiego Alvarez
Diego Alvarez
Prediction of walking turns allows to improve human factors such as comfort and perceived safety in human-robot interaction. The current state-of-the-art suggests that upper body kinematics can be used for that purpose and contains evidence about the reliability and the quantitative anticipation that can be expected from different variables. However, the experimental methodology has not been consistent throughout the different works and the related data has not always been given in an explicit form, with different studies containing partial, complementary or even contradictory results. In this paper, with the purpose of providing a uniform view of the topic that can trigger new developments in the field, we performed a systematic review of the relevant literature addressing three main questions: (i) Which upper body kinematic variables permit to anticipate a walking turn? (ii) How long in advance can we anticipate the turn from them? (iii) What is the expected contribution of walking turn prediction systems from upper body kinematics for human-robot interaction? We have found that head yaw was the most reliable kinematical variable from the upper body to predict walking turns about 200ms. Trunk roll anticipates walking turns by a similar amount of time, but with less reliability. Both approaches may benefit human-robot interaction in close proximity, helping the robot to exhibit appropriate proxemic behavior interacting at intimate, personal or social distances. From the point of view of safety, they have to be considered with caution. Trunk yaw is not valid to anticipate turns. Gaze Yaw seems to be the earliest predictor, although existing evidence is still inconclusive.

15 December 2018 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Juan Carlos AlvarezJuan Carlos Alvarez
Juan Carlos Alvarez
DADiego Alvarez
Diego Alvarez
Antonio Miguel Lopez RodriguezAntonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez
Antonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez
In human motion science, accelerometers are used as linear distance sensors by attaching them to moving body parts, with their measurement axes its measurement axis aligned in the direction of motion. When double integrating the raw sensor data, multiple error sources are also integrated integrated as well, producing inaccuracies in the final position estimation which increases fast with the integration time. In this paper, we make a systematic and experimental comparison of different methods for position estimation, with different sensors and in different motion conditions. The objective is to correlate practical factors that appear in real applications, such as motion mean velocity, path length, calibration method, or accelerometer noise level, with the quality of the estimation. The results confirm that it is possible to use accelerometers to estimate short linear displacements of the body with a typical error of around 4.5% in the general conditions tested in this study. However, they also show that the motion kinematic conditions can be a key factor in the performance of this estimation, as the dynamic response of the accelerometer can affect the final results. The study lays out the basis for a better design of distance estimations, which are useful in a wide range of ambulatory human motion monitoring applications.

29 August 2012 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Antonio Miguel Lopez RodriguezAntonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez
Antonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez
DADiego Alvarez
Diego Alvarez
RRRafael Corsino Gonzalez De Los Reyes
Rafael Corsino Gonzalez De Los Reyes
Juan Carlos AlvarezJuan Carlos Alvarez
Juan Carlos Alvarez
In this paper we propose an approach for the estimation of the slope of the walking surface during normal walking using a body-worn sensor composed of a biaxial accelerometer and a uniaxial gyroscope attached to the shank. It builds upon a state of the art technique that was successfully used to estimate the walking velocity from walking stride data, but did not work when used to estimate the slope of the walking surface. As claimed by the authors, the reason was that it did not take into account the actual inclination of the shank of the stance leg at the beginning of the stride (mid stance). In this paper, inspired by the biomechanical characteristics of human walking, we propose to solve this issue by using the accelerometer as a tilt sensor, assuming that at mid stance it is only measuring the gravity acceleration. Results from a set of experiments involving several users walking at different inclinations on a treadmill confirm the feasibility of our approach. A statistical analysis of slope estimations shows in first instance that the technique is capable of distinguishing the different slopes of the walking surface for every subject. It reports a global RMS error (per-unit difference between actual and estimated inclination of the walking surface for each stride identified in the experiments) of 0.05 and this can be reduced to 0.03 with subject-specific calibration and post processing procedures by means of averaging techniques.

21 August 2024 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DTDiego Valdés Tirado Tirado
Diego Valdés Tirado Tirado
Gonzalo García CarroGonzalo García Carro
Gonzalo García Carro
Juan Carlos AlvarezJuan Carlos Alvarez
Juan Carlos Alvarez
Antonio Miguel Lopez RodriguezAntonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez
Antonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez
DADiego Alvarez
Diego Alvarez
The utilization of inertial measurement units as wearable sensors is proliferating across various domains, such as health care, sports, and rehabilitation. This expansion has produced a market of devices tailored to accommodate very specific ranges of operational demands. Simultaneously, this growth is creating opportunities for the development of a new class of devices more oriented towards general-purpose use and capable of capturing both high-frequency signals for short-term, event-driven motion analysis and low-frequency signals for extended monitoring. For such a design, which combines flexibility and low cost, a rigorous evaluation of the device in terms of deviation, noise levels, and precision is essential. This evaluation is crucial for identifying potential improvements and refining the design accordingly, yet it is rarely addressed in the literature. This paper presents the development process of such a device. The results of the design process demonstrate acceptable performance in optimizing energy consumption and storage capacity while highlighting the most critical optimizations needed to advance the device towards the goal of a smart, general-purpose unit for human motion monitoring.

28 May 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLeticia González
Leticia González
Juan Carlos AlvarezJuan Carlos Alvarez
Juan Carlos Alvarez
Antonio Miguel Lopez RodriguezAntonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez
Antonio Miguel Lopez Rodriguez
DADiego Alvarez
Diego Alvarez
In the context of human–robot collaborative shared environments, there has been an increase in the use of optical motion capture (OMC) systems for human motion tracking. The accuracy and precision of OMC technology need to be assessed in order to ensure safe human–robot interactions, but the accuracy specifications provided by manufacturers are easily influenced by various factors affecting the measurements. This article describes a new methodology for the metrological evaluation of a human–robot collaborative environment based on optical motion capture (OMC) systems. Inspired by the ASTM E3064 test guide, and taking advantage of an existing industrial robot in the production cell, the system is evaluated for mean error, error spread, and repeatability. A detailed statistical study of the error distribution across the capture area is carried out, supported by a Mann–Whitney U-test for median comparisons. Based on the results, optimal capture areas for the use of the capture system are suggested. The results of the proposed method show that the metrological characteristics obtained are compatible and comparable in quality to other methods that do not require the intervention of an industrial robot.