The field of immunotherapy has undergone radical conceptual changes over the last decade. There are various examples of immunotherapy, including the use of monoclonal antibodies, cancer vaccines, tumor-infecting viruses, cytokines, adjuvants, and autologous T cells carrying chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) that can bind cancer-specific antigens known as adoptive immunotherapy. While a lot has been achieved in the field of T-cell immunotherapy, only a fraction of patients (20%) see lasting benefits from this mode of treatment, which is why there is a critical need to turn our attention to other immune cells. B cells have been shown to play both anti- and pro-tumorigenic roles in tumor tissue. In this review, we shed light on the dual nature of B cells in the tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, we discussed the different factors affecting the biology and function of B cells in tumors. In the third section, we described B-cell-based immunotherapies and their clinical applications and challenges. These current studies provide a springboard for carrying out future mechanistic studies to help us unleash the full potential of B cells in immunotherapy.

B cell signaling for activation via the BCR occurs as an isolated event only in vitro; in real life, BCR signaling takes place within a complex milieu that involves interactions with agents that trigger additional receptors. Chief among these is IL-4. We have shown that BCR signaling is reprogrammed by IL-4 receptor engagement and that this reprogramming involves creation of a new, signalosome-independent, Lyn-dependent alternate signaling pathway in B cells isolated from BALB/cByJ mice. A unique aspect of the alternate pathway is protein kinase Cδ (PKCδ) phosphorylation. In dissecting this pathway, we unexpectedly found that Lyn is associated with IL-4Rα, that IL-4 induces Lyn activation, and that Lyn immunoprecipitated from IL-4–treated B cells capably phosphorylates PKCδ in a cell-free system. However, PKCδ phosphorylation does not occur in the absence of BCR triggering in vivo. This raised the question of why IL-4 alone failed to produce PKCδ phosphorylation. We considered the possibility that Lyn and PKCδ may be spatially separated. As expected, before any treatment, Lyn is located primarily in the membrane fraction, whereas PKCδ is located mainly in the cytosol fraction. However, when anti-Ig follows IL-4 treatment, PKCδ is found in the membrane fraction and phosphorylated. This translocation of PKCδ to the membrane fraction is not affected by loss of Lyn, although PKCδ phosphorylation requires Lyn. Thus, PKCδ phosphorylation through the alternate pathway represents the result of signal integration, whereby neither IL-4 nor anti-Ig working alone produces this outcome, but together they achieve this result by Lyn activation (IL-4) and PKCδ translocation (IL-4 followed by anti-Ig).

Recently, we reported that preexposure of B cells to IL-4 induced an alternate, signalosome-independent BCR signaling pathway leading to protein kinase C (PKC)δ phosphorylation (pTyr311), which occurs in the membrane compartment. This is considered to represent a form of receptor crosstalk and signal integration. Unlike the classical BCR signaling pathway, Lyn kinase is indispensable for BCR-induced downstream events in the alternate pathway. Our previous report that alternate BCR signaling leading to ERK phosphorylation is triggered by LPS and PAM3CSK4 (much like IL-4) raises the possibility that other signaling outcomes such as PKCδ phosphorylation might be similarly affected. To explore the range of mediators capable of producing an alternate pathway for BCR signaling, we examined PKCδ translocation and phosphorylation in LPS- and PAM3CSK4-treated B cells stimulated by anti-Ig. We found that LPS and PAM3CSK4 alter the signaling pathway used by the BCR to produce PKCδ phosphorylation. As with IL-4, elements of the signalosome are not needed for PKCδ phosphorylation when BCR triggering occurs after LPS and PAM3CSK4. However, with LPS and PAM3CSK4, anti-Ig–induced phosphorylation of PKCδ takes place in the cytosol, in contrast to the IL-4–induced alternate pathway, wherein PKCδ phosphorylation occurs in the membrane. Furthermore, the BCR signaling pathway induced by LPS and PAM3CSK4 differs from that induced by IL-4 by not requiring Lyn. Thus, an alternate, signalosome-independent BCR signaling pathway for PKCδ phosphorylation is induced by TLR agonists but differs in important ways from the alternate pathway induced by IL-4.