Lee-Fay Low

Prof. Lee-Fay Low

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 May 2011 in BMC Health Services Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLee-Fay Low
Lee-Fay Low
MYMelvyn Yap
Melvyn Yap
HBHenry Brodaty
Henry Brodaty
Costs and consumer preference have led to a shift from the long-term institutional care of aged older people to home and community based care. The aim of this review is to evaluate the outcomes of case managed, integrated or consumer directed home and community care services for older persons, including those with dementia.


1 January 2009 in Alzheimer's & Dementia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLee-Fay Low
Lee-Fay Low
KAKaarin Jane Anstey
Kaarin Jane Anstey

11 November 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLee-Fay Low
Lee-Fay Low
JFJennifer Fletcher
Jennifer Fletcher
BGBelinda Goodenough
Belinda Goodenough
YJYun-Hee Jeon
Yun-Hee Jeon
CEChristopher Etherton-Beer
Christopher Etherton-Beer
EBElizabeth Beattie
Elizabeth Beattie
We systematically reviewed interventions that attempted to change staff practice to improve long-term care resident outcomes. Studies met criteria if they used a control group, included 6 or more nursing home units and quantitatively assessed staff behavior or resident outcomes. Intervention components were coded as including education material, training, audit and feedback, monitoring, champions, team meetings, policy or procedures and organizational restructure. Sixty-three unique studies were broadly grouped according to clinical domain—oral health (3 studies), hygiene and infection control (3 studies), nutrition (2 studies), nursing home acquired pneumonia (2 studies), depression (2 studies) appropriate prescribing (7 studies), reduction of physical restraints (3 studies), management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (6 studies), falls reduction and prevention (11 studies), quality improvement (9 studies), philosophy of care (10 studies) and other (5 studies). No single intervention component, combination of, or increased number of components was associated with greater likelihood of positive outcomes. Studies with positive outcomes for residents also tended to change staff behavior, however changing staff behavior did not necessarily improve resident outcomes. Studies targeting specific care tasks (e.g. oral care, physical restraints) were more likely to produce positive outcomes than those requiring global practice changes (e.g. care philosophy). Studies using intervention theories were more likely to be successful. Program logic was rarely articulated, so it was often unclear whether there was a coherent connection between the intervention components and measured outcomes. Many studies reported barriers relating to staff (e.g. turnover, high workload, attitudes) or organizational factors (e.g. funding, resources, logistics). Changing staff practice in nursing homes is possible but complex. Interventionists should consider barriers and feasibility of program components to impact on each intended outcome.

1 August 2013 in The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLee-Fay Low
Lee-Fay Low
FHFleur Harrison
Fleur Harrison
SLSteven M. Lackersteen
Steven M. Lackersteen

15 March 2018 in Dementia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLee-Fay Low
Lee-Fay Low
MMMargaret McGrath
Margaret McGrath
KSKate Swaffer
Kate Swaffer
HBHenry Brodaty
Henry Brodaty
The aim of this study is to systematically review practitioners’ practices and attitudes in regards to communicating a diagnosis of dementia. A systematic search was conducted of Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed for English language original empirical papers. A sequential explanatory mixed studies analysis approach was used. Twenty-five quantitative descriptive, two intervention, six mixed methods descriptive and 21 qualitative studies were included. Pooled analysis showed that 34% of GPs and 48% of specialists usually/routinely tell the person with dementia their diagnosis, and 89% of GPs and 97% specialists usually/routinely tell the family the diagnosis. Euphemistic terms such as ‘memory problems’ are more often used to describe dementia than medical terms. Practitioners’ decision to diagnose and communicate the diagnosis of dementia are influenced by (a) their own beliefs regarding dementia and treatment efficacy and their confidence in diagnosis and communication; (b) patient circumstances including level of awareness, level of severity and family support; (c) the health and social care system including access to specialist and diagnostic services, reimbursement for diagnosis/management and availability of services and (d) cultural norms in relation to dementia including stigma, labels, and common clinical practice. The diagnosis and communication of diagnosis of dementia are intertwined processes and should be concurrently addressed in interventions. Multicomponent approaches to address these practices could include guideline development, practitioner education, anti-stigma public health campaigns, offering post-diagnosis treatments and support and sufficient reimbursement for practitioners for time spent managing dementia.