Geng CAO

Dr. Geng CAO


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 August 2026 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWShaopeng Wu
Shaopeng Wu
GCGeng CAO
Geng CAO
DWDongxin Wang
Dongxin Wang
JLJunyi Li
Junyi Li
JZJiankang Zhang
Jiankang Zhang
YYYiqun Yang
Yiqun Yang
This study examines the microstructural evolution and tensile response of a cold-rolled C17200 Cu–Be–Co alloy strip after short-time annealing at 550 and 610 °C. X-ray diffraction (XRD), electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), kernel average misorientation (KAM) analysis, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and room-temperature tensile testing were used to compare phase constitution, grain-boundary character, recrystallization behavior, texture evolution, dislocation substructure, and tensile properties. The results show that both annealed samples mainly consisted of an α-Cu matrix and a small amount of BeCu-related precipitates. After annealing at 550 °C, the alloy retained a recovery-dominated partially recrystallized microstructure, with an average grain size of 1.47 μm, a low-angle grain boundary fraction of 8.4%, a recrystallized fraction of 18.06%, and evident residual dislocation substructures. This condition exhibited a yield strength of 365.5 MPa. After annealing at 610 °C, recrystallization was substantially promoted, the average grain size increased to 1.92 μm, the high-angle grain boundary fraction increased to 97.5%, and the recrystallized fraction reached 82.76%. Meanwhile, the yield strength decreased to 276.6 MPa because of the reduced contribution from dislocation strengthening. These results indicate that, under the two investigated short-time annealing conditions, the strength difference in the alloy is mainly associated with the transition of microstructural evolution from recovery-dominated partial recrystallization to a recrystallization-dominated microstructure.

3 August 2026 in Crystals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGeng CAO
Geng CAO
SWShaopeng Wu
Shaopeng Wu
DWDongxin Wang
Dongxin Wang
ZYZhaopeng Yang
Zhaopeng Yang
LYLipeng Yang
Lipeng Yang
XSXixi Su
Xixi Su
Be–Al alloys are attractive for aerospace and precision-engineering applications because of their low density, high specific stiffness, and excellent dimensional stability. However, their broader application is constrained by multiscale defects arising from the low mutual solubility of Be and Al, their large melting-point difference, and the high reactivity of the Be/Al interface. This review critically examines defect formation and microstructural evolution in Be–Al alloys produced by casting, powder metallurgy, pressure infiltration, thermomechanical processing, and additive manufacturing, with particular emphasis on additive manufacturing. Rapid solidification can refine the Be-rich phase and suppress coarse segregation, but unstable melt-pool behavior, restricted gas escape, cyclic thermal loading, and insufficient interfacial diffusion may also promote porosity, compositional heterogeneity, residual stress, and interfacial degradation. The mechanical properties of Be–Al alloys depend strongly on Be-phase morphology, continuity of the Al matrix, interfacial integrity, and the spatial distribution of processing-induced defects. Recent progress in alloy design, process optimization, interfacial engineering, and post-processing is evaluated, together with the limitations of the available evidence. Future research should establish quantitative processing–defect–microstructure–property relationships through in situ monitoring, multiscale characterization, predictive modeling, and standardized mechanical validation. These advances are essential for the reliable manufacture of complex, high-performance Be–Al components.