Sleep state misperception (SSM) is a common issue in insomnia disorder (ID), causing a discrepancy between objective and subjective sleep/wake time estimation and increased daytime impairments. In this context, the hyperarousal theory assumes that sustained central nervous system activation contributes to the SSM. This study investigates factors influencing SSM during sleep latency (SL) and total sleep time (TST). Objective polysomnographic sleep variables (the alpha density index, latency-to-sleep stages and the first K-complex, and Rapid Eye Movement (REM) arousal density) and subjective sleep indices, taken from sleep diaries, were analyzed in 16 ID patients. Correlation analyses revealed a positive association between the degree of SL misperception (SLm) and the percentage of epochs that contained a visually scored stereotyped alpha rhythm during objective SL. A regression analysis showed that the REM arousal density and alpha density index significantly predicted TST misperception (TSTm). Furthermore, the degree of SLm was associated with an increased probability of transitioning from stage 1 of non-REM sleep to wakefulness during subjective SL. These findings support the role of hyperarousal in SSM and highlight the importance of alpha activity in unravelling the heterogeneous underpinnings of SSM.

Background/Objectives: Sleep state misperception (SSM) is a common phenomenon in insomnia disorder (ID), characterized by a discrepancy between subjective and objective sleep metrics. Recent studies have revealed microstructural EEG alterations specifically in misperceiving ID patients, yet clinically accessible SSM markers remain limited. This study aimed to characterize SSM within ID by integrating standard polysomnography (PSG) features and cognitive-affective traits, focusing on accessible clinical tools. Methods: Twenty patients with ID and twenty healthy controls (HC) underwent a night of PSG recording and completed both sleep diaries and a comprehensive psychological assessment. SSM was quantified using the Total Sleep Time misperception index (TSTm), analyzed both dimensionally and categorically Results: IDs reported significantly altered sleep parameters compared to HCs, both subjectively and objectively. Within the ID sample, although underestimators and normoestimators had similar objective TST, underestimators showed significantly more cortical arousal density (CAd), a higher percentage of sleep stage 1 and higher non-acceptance of emotions. Notably, none of the HC reached the threshold for being classified as underestimators. Regression analyses identified CAd, latency to sleep stage 3 and to REM, percentage of REM sleep and lack of emotional clarity, as key predictors of TSTm. Conclusions: SSM in insomnia reflects a dimensional vulnerability grounded in subtle sleep fragmentation and emotional dysregulation. Recognizing SSM as a clinically meaningful phenomenon may guide more targeted, emotion-focused, interventions for insomnia.