Angel Garcia-Lora

Dr. Angel Garcia-Lora

Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2016 in Current Opinion in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FGFederico Garrido
Federico Garrido
NANatalia Aptsiauri
Natalia Aptsiauri
EDElien M Doorduijn
Elien M Doorduijn
AGAngel Garcia-Lora
Angel Garcia-Lora
THThorbald van Hall
Thorbald van Hall
Immune escape strategies aimed to avoid T-cell recognition, including the loss of tumor MHC class I expression, are commonly found in malignant cells. Tumor immune escape has proven to have a negative effect on the clinical outcome of cancer immunotherapy, including treatment with antibodies blocking immune checkpoint molecules. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop novel approaches to overcome tumor immune evasion. MHC class I antigen presentation is often affected in human cancers and the capacity to induce upregulation of MHC class I cell surface expression is a critical step in the induction of tumor rejection. This review focuses on characterization of rejection, escape, and dormant profiles of tumors and its microenvironment with a special emphasis on the tumor MHC class I expression. We also discuss possible approaches to recover MHC class I expression on tumor cells harboring reversible/'soft' or irreversible/'hard' genetic lesions. Such MHC class I recovery approaches might well synergize with complementary forms of immunotherapy.

9 April 2003 in Journal of Cellular Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAngel Garcia-Lora
Angel Garcia-Lora
IAIgnacio Algarra
Ignacio Algarra
FGFederico Garrido
Federico Garrido

7 April 2004 in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IAIgnacio Algarra
Ignacio Algarra
AGAngel Garcia-Lora
Angel Garcia-Lora
TCTeresa Cabrera
Teresa Cabrera
FRFrancisco Ruiz-Cabello
Francisco Ruiz-Cabello
FGFederico Garrido
Federico Garrido

1 January 2007
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
NANatalia Aptsiauri
Natalia Aptsiauri
TCTeresa Cabrera
Teresa Cabrera
AGAngel Garcia-Lora
Angel Garcia-Lora
MLMiguel Angel Lopez‐Nevot
Miguel Angel Lopez‐Nevot
FRFrancisco Ruiz‐Cabello
Francisco Ruiz‐Cabello
FGFederico Garrido
Federico Garrido

5 May 2006 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EJEva Jiménez-Medina
Eva Jiménez-Medina
AGAngel Garcia-Lora
Angel Garcia-Lora
LPLaura Paco
Laura Paco
IAIgnacio Algarra
Ignacio Algarra
ACAntonia Collado
Antonia Collado
FGFederico Garrido
Federico Garrido
Background: Phytopharmacological studies of different Calendula extracts have shown anti-inflamatory, anti-viral and anti-genotoxic properties of therapeutic interest. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro cytotoxic anti-tumor and immunomodulatory activities and in vivo anti-tumor effect of Laser Activated Calendula Extract (LACE), a novel extract of the plant Calendula Officinalis (Asteraceae). Methods: An aqueous extract of Calendula Officinalis was obtained by a novel extraction method in order to measure its anti-tumor and immunomodulatory activities in vitro. Tumor cell lines derived from leukemias, melanomas, fibrosarcomas and cancers of breast, prostate, cervix, lung, pancreas and colorectal were used and tumor cell proliferation in vitro was measured by BrdU incorporation and viable cell count. Effect of LACE on human peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) proliferation in vitro was also analyzed. Studies of cell cycle and apoptosis were performed in LACE-treated cells. In vivo anti-tumor activity was evaluated in nude mice bearing subcutaneously human Ando-2 melanoma cells. Results: The LACE extract showed a potent in vitro inhibition of tumor cell proliferation when tested on a wide variety of human and murine tumor cell lines. The inhibition ranged from 70 to 100%. Mechanisms of inhibition were identified as cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase and Caspase-3-induced apoptosis. Interestingly, the same extract showed an opposite effect when tested on PBLs and NKL cell line, in which in vitro induction of proliferation and activation of these cells was observed. The intraperitoneal injection or oral administration of LACE extract in nude mice inhibits in vivo tumor growth of Ando-2 melanoma cells and prolongs the survival day of the mice. Conclusion: These results indicate that LACE aqueous extract has two complementary activities in vitro with potential anti-tumor therapeutic effect: cytotoxic tumor cell activity and lymphocyte activation. The LACE extract presented in vivo anti-tumoral activity in nude mice against tumor growth of Ando-2 melanoma cells.

24 September 1999 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAntonia Collado
Antonia Collado
TCTeresa Cabrera
Teresa Cabrera
ASAlfonso Serrano
Alfonso Serrano
LRLuis M Real
Luis M Real
FRFrancisco Ruiz-Cabello
Francisco Ruiz-Cabello
AGAngel Garcia-Lora
Angel Garcia-Lora
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the short arm of chromosome 6 (6p) was detected in samples obtained from colon (13.8%), larynx (17.6%) and melanoma (15.3%) tumors. The parallel study of HLA‐antigen expression in tumor tissues using locus‐ and polymorphic‐specific antibodies in combination with LOH microsatellite analysis on 6p allowed us to establish that LOH in chromosome 6 is a representative phenomenon in most tumor cells present in a given tumor tissue. In most cases, specific HLA alleles had been lost in a predominant population of tumor cells, indicating that LOH is a non‐irrelevant mutation that probably confers a selective advantage for survival of the mutant cell. We also demonstrate that LOH frequently occurred through chromosome loss rather than somatic recombination. LOH at all loci studied on the p and q arms of chromosome 6 was observed in at least 56.2% (9/17) cases. This HLA‐associated microsatellite analysis was a useful tool for classifying tumors as LOH‐positive or ‐negative, and therefore to consider a patient as a potential non‐responder or responder in a vaccination trial. Int. J. Cancer 83:91–97, 1999.