Background: Humans have coevolved with microbial communities to establish a mutually advantageous relationship that is still poorly characterized and can provide a better understanding of the human microbiome. Comparative metagenomic analysis of human and non-human primate (NHP) microbiomes offers a promising approach to study this symbiosis. Very few microbial species have been characterized in NHP microbiomes due to their poor representation in the available cataloged microbial diversity, thus limiting the potential of such comparative approaches. Results: We reconstruct over 1000 previously uncharacterized microbial species from 6 available NHP metagenomic cohorts, resulting in an increase of the mappable fraction of metagenomic reads by 600%. These novel species highlight that almost 90% of the microbial diversity associated with NHPs has been overlooked. Comparative analysis of this new catalog of taxa with the collection of over 150,000 genomes from human metagenomes points at a limited species-level overlap, with only 20% of microbial candidate species in NHPs also found in the human microbiome. This overlap occurs mainly between NHPs and non-Westernized human populations and NHPs living in captivity, suggesting that host lifestyle plays a role comparable to host speciation in shaping the primate intestinal microbiome. Several NHP-specific species are phylogenetically related to human-associated microbes, such as Elusimicrobia and Treponema, and could be the consequence of host-dependent evolutionary trajectories. Conclusions: The newly reconstructed species greatly expand the microbial diversity associated with NHPs, thus enabling better interrogation of the primate microbiome and empowering in-depth human and non-human comparative and co-diversification studies.
The rising prevalence of liver diseases related to obesity and excessive use of alcohol is fuelling an increasing demand for accurate biomarkers aimed at community screening, diagnosis of steatohepatitis and significant fibrosis, monitoring, prognostication and prediction of treatment efficacy. Breakthroughs in omics methodologies and the power of bioinformatics have created an excellent opportunity to apply technological advances to clinical needs, for instance in the development of precision biomarkers for personalised medicine. Via omics technologies, biological processes from the genes to circulating protein, as well as the microbiome - including bacteria, viruses and fungi, can be investigated on an axis. However, there are important barriers to omics-based biomarker discovery and validation, including the use of semi-quantitative measurements from untargeted platforms, which may exhibit high analytical, inter- and intra-individual variance. Standardising methods and the need to validate them across diverse populations presents a challenge, partly due to disease complexity and the dynamic nature of biomarker expression at different disease stages. Lack of validity causes lost opportunities when studies fail to provide the knowledge needed for regulatory approvals, all of which contributes to a delayed translation of these discoveries into clinical practice. While no omics-based biomarkers have matured to clinical implementation, the extent of data generated has enabled the hypothesis-free discovery of a plethora of candidate biomarkers that warrant further validation. To explore the many opportunities of omics technologies, hepatologists need detailed knowledge of commonalities and differences between the various omics layers, and both the barriers to and advantages of these approaches.
Large public datasets of the human microbiome now exist but combining them for large-scale analysis is difficult due to a lack of standardization. We developed curatedMetagenomicData (cMD) 3, a uniformly processed collection of over 22,000 human microbiome samples with manually curated metadata from 94 studies and 42 countries. This large and diverse resource allows for meta-analysis of the links between microbes and human health. Through meta-analysis, we identified hundreds of microbial species and thousands of microbial functions significantly associated with a person’s sex, age, body mass index, and disease status, and catalog these as references. We developed an “oral enrichment score” (OES) based on the relative abundance of bacteria typically found in the oral cavity and not in the gut. Higher OES in the gut is a consistent feature in individuals with disease, suggesting that the relative abundance of oral bacteria in the gut is a simple and quantifiable signal of altered microbiome health. These analyses identify modest but widely shared patterns in human microbiomes, serving as a reproducible and readily updatable reference.
Impaired gut barrier function may lead to progression of liver fibrosis in people with alcohol-related liver disease. The postbiotic ReFerm® can lower gut barrier permeability and may thereby reduce fibrosis formation. Here, we report the results from an open-labelled, single centre randomized controlled trial where 56 patients with advanced, compensated, alcohol-related liver disease were assigned 1:1 to receive either ReFerm® (n = 28) or standard nutritional support (Fresubin®, n = 28) for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was a ≥ 10% reduction of the fibrosis formation marker alpha-smooth muscle actin in liver biopsies, assessed by a blinded pathologist using automated digital imaging analysis. Paired liver biopsies meeting quality criteria for the primary outcome were available for 40 participants (ReFerm®, n = 21 and Fresubin®, n = 19). This reduction was observed in 29% of patients receiving ReFerm®, compared to 14% with Fresubin® (OR = 2.40; 95% CI 0.63 to 9.16; p = 0.200). No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. Our findings suggest that ReFerm® may reduce liver fibrosis by enhancing gut barrier function, potentially preventing the progression of alcohol-related liver disease.
Summary: Background: Enterotypes describe human fecal microbiomes grouped by similarity into clusters of microbial community composition, often associated with disease, medications, diet, and lifestyle. Numbers and determinants of enterotypes have been derived by diverse frameworks and applied to cohorts that often lack diversity or inter-cohort comparability. Results: To overcome these limitations, we selected 16,772 fecal metagenomes collected from 38 countries to revisit the enterotypes using state-of-the-art fuzzy clustering and found robust clustering regardless of underlying taxonomy, consistent with previous findings. Quantifying the strength of enterotype classifications enriched the enterotype landscape, also reflecting some continuity of microbial compositions. As the classification strength was associated with the patient’s health status, we established an “Enterotype Dysbiosis Score” (EDS) as a latent covariate for various diseases. Conclusion: This global study confirms the enterotypes, reveals a dysbiosis signal within the enterotype landscape, and enables robust classification of metagenomes with an online “Enterotyper” tool, allowing reproducible analysis in future studies. Graphical
Metagenomic sequencing enables the in-depth study of microbes and their functions in humans, animals, and the environment. While sequencing data is deposited in public databases, the associated contextual data is often not complete and needs to be retrieved from primary publications. This lack of access to sample-level metadata like clinical data or in situ observations impedes cross-study comparisons and meta-analyses. We therefore created the Metalog database, a repository of manually curated metadata for metagenomics samples across the globe. It contains 80 423 samples from humans (including 66 527 of the gut microbiome), 10 744 animal samples, 5547 ocean water samples, and 23 455 samples from other environmental habitats such as soil, sediment, or fresh water. Samples have been consistently annotated for a set of habitat-specific core features, such as demographics, disease status, and medication for humans; host species and captivity status for animals; and filter sizes and salinity for marine samples. Additionally, all original metadata is provided in tabular form, simplifying focused studies e.g. into nutrient concentrations. Pre-computed taxonomic profiles facilitate rapid data exploration, while links to the SPIRE database enable genome-based analyses. The database is freely available for browsing and download at https://metalog.embl.de/.