Tianyi Wen

Dr. Tianyi Wen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 October 2026 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TWTianyi Wen
Tianyi Wen
HLHuanyu Liu
Huanyu Liu
YSYuanyuan Sheng
Yuanyuan Sheng
KQKefan Qu
Kefan Qu
JLJun-Bao Li
Jun-Bao Li
GWGuoqing Wu
Guoqing Wu
Range–Doppler (RD) spectrogram-based maritime target recognition requires effective feature learning when labeled training samples are limited and the range and Doppler axes convey different physical information. We propose DAMD-Net, which combines Asymmetric Dimension-Aware Fusion (ADF) with a Dual-Directional Attention Module (DDAM). ADF integrates range-wise scattering features, Doppler-wise motion features, and local two-dimensional context, while DDAM recalibrates the fused representation through axis-specific descriptors and learnable fusion weights. With 5% of the simulated dataset used for training, DAMD-Net achieves 86.15±0.43% accuracy and 83.57±0.41% macro-F1. With 10% used for training, the corresponding results are 89.55±0.39% accuracy and 87.48±0.51% macro-F1. At the smaller 1% and 2% training budgets, DAMD-Net improves macro-F1 over VGG16 by 1.64 and 1.82 percentage points, respectively, with positive unadjusted 95% paired confidence intervals. Each training budget uses an additional 4049 labeled validation samples. Component ablations, kernel and pooling sensitivity studies, and condition-holdout evaluations examine the contribution of directional modeling; DAMD-Net has higher mean accuracy than VGG16 in all three elevation-holdout intervals. Controlled perturbation tests show advantages under partial Doppler masking and structured synthetic clutter: at a baseline-RD-to-added-clutter ratio of −10 dB, accuracy reaches 62.74%, compared with 36.68% for VGG16. On the external MTDSP dataset, DAMD-Net achieves 97.13% accuracy; on the measured LSS-DAUR dataset, it achieves 75.00±14.03% accuracy under five-fold cross-validation. DAMD-Net also reduces parameters by 89.9% and registered FLOPs by 52.6% relative to VGG16. Together, these findings support explicit RD anisotropy modeling for recognition with restricted training data, with complementary benefits in the evaluated disturbance conditions and model storage.