Prompt recognition of frailty in the emergency department (ED) is important to identify patients at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Despite this, few studies examine the diagnostic accuracy of screening instruments for frailty, instead focusing on predictive validity. We compared three commonly used, short frailty screens to an independent comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in an urban University Hospital ED. Consecutive attendees aged ≥70 years were screened by trained raters, blind to the CGA, with the Variable Indicative of Placement risk (VIP), 3 and 4-item versions, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and PRISMA-7. Accuracy was measured from the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). In total, 197 patients were included, median age 79 (±10); 46% were female. Half (49%) were confirmed as frail after CGA. All instruments differentiated frail from non-frail states, although the CFS (AUROC: 0.91) and PRISMA-7 (AUROC: 0.90) had higher accuracy compared to the VIP-4 (AUROC: 0.84) and VIP-3 (AUROC: 0.84). The CFS was significantly more accurate than the VIP-3 (p = 0.026) or VIP-4 (p = 0.047). There was no significant difference between the CFS and PRISMA-7 (p = 0.90). The CFS and PRISMA-7 were more accurate and should be considered in preference to the VIP (3 or 4-item versions) to identify frailty in EDs.

Background: Prompt and efficient identification and stratification of patients who are frail is important, as this cohort are at high risk of adverse healthcare outcomes. Numerous frailty screening tools have been developed to support their identification across different settings, yet relatively few have emerged for use in emergency departments (EDs). This protocol provides details for a systematic review aiming to synthesize the accumulated evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy and clinimetric properties of frailty screening instruments to identify frail older adults in EDs. Methods: Six electronic databases will be searched from January 2000 to March 2021. Eligible studies will include adults aged ≥60 years screened in EDs with any available screening instrument to identify frailty (even if not originally designed for this purpose). Studies, including case-control, longitudinal, and cohort studies, will be included, where instruments are compared to a reference standard to explore diagnostic accuracy. Predictive accuracy for a selection of outcomes, including mortality, institutionalization, and readmission, will be assessed. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity will be examined, and a random effects meta-analysis performed if appropriate. Conclusion: Understanding whether frailty screening on presentation to EDs is accurate in identifying frailty, and predicting these outcomes is important for decision-making and targeting appropriate management.

Background Older people are more likely to have multiple co-morbidities and complex needs. They are at increased risk of prolonged hospital stay without the appropriate multi-disciplinary assessment. Not all older patients are admitted under a geriatric medicine service, therefore a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is often provided as part of a consultation service.

Background The National Strategy for the Prevention of Falls and Fractures in Ireland (2008) set out a vision for a future free of falls and fractures for Ireland's ageing population. In keeping with this strategy, our catchment area had a goal of implementing an integrated falls and fracture prevention project. The project has three main work streams: building community capacity for falls risk assessment; re-engineering specialist falls services to improve access; and standardising continuing care assessments and prevention strategies. In this paper, we report on the change management involved in this complex integrated project.

Background: Oral bisphosphonates are first-line osteoporosis therapy but can cause mucosal chemical injury when tablets are retained rather than swallowed correctly. This risk is heightened in cognitively impaired older adults with dysphagia or difficulty complying with medication administration guidelines. Case Presentation: A 73-year-old female nursing home resident with advanced vascular dementia presented with 24 h of oral pain, reduced intake, lethargy and new facial swelling. She had received monthly ibandronic acid 150 mg for two years, with documented difficulty swallowing tablets but no formal swallowing assessment. Examination showed ulceration of the left lower lip and anterior tongue with mild vestibular swelling. Clinical investigations excluded haematinic deficiency and osteonecrosis; traumatic, lichenoid, vesiculobullous and neoplastic causes were considered unlikely based on distribution, clinical features and temporal association with the recent dose. Bisphosphonate-associated chemical mucosal injury was diagnosed by hospital dental services. Ibandronic acid was discontinued, topical treatment initiated, and ulcers resolved by three weeks. Denosumab was substituted in view of the patient’s dysphagia and cognitive status. Discussion: This case supports the existing literature identifying inappropriate administration—often linked to dysphagia or physical impairment—as a leading cause of oral bisphosphonate-associated ulceration, typically affecting the tongue and lower lip. Ibandronate-related cases are rarely reported, likely reflecting prescribing frequency rather than lower risk. Current guidelines lack explicit recommendations addressing dysphagia or cognition in prescribing decisions. Conclusions: Presence of dysphagia and cognitive status should be assessed before and during oral bisphosphonate therapy. New oral pain, ulceration or facial swelling should prompt oral examination and medication review, with alternative antiresorptive agents considered when oral administration is impaired.

Background The national falls prevention strategy recommends a greater focus on falls prevention and the use of sustainable and equitable evidence-based interventions. Falls prevention interventions are effective however, there are practical, cultural, and professional challenges to implementing such complex interventions. Our aim is to evaluate an integrated Falls and Fractures Prevention Pathway, a complex service intervention involving changes to existing specialist falls services, standardisation of falls prevention practices in community hospitals, and the introduction of new community-based falls risk assessment clinics (FRAC).