J. Andrew Black

Dr. J. Andrew Black


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 February 2019 in Medical Journal of Australia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJ. Andrew Black
J. Andrew Black
KCKevin Cheng
Kevin Cheng
JFJo‐Anne Flood
Jo‐Anne Flood
GHGarry Hamilton
Garry Hamilton
SPSerena Parker
Serena Parker
TMTom Marwick
Tom Marwick
Objectives To compare the outcomes and safety of a rapid access chest pain clinic (RACPC) in Australia with those of a general cardiology clinic. Design Prospective comparison of the outcomes for patients attending an RACPC and those of historical controls. Setting Royal Hobart Hospital cardiology outpatient department. Participants 1914 patients referred for outpatient evaluation of new onset chest pain (1479 patients seen in the RACPC, 435 patients previously seen in the general cardiology clinic). Main outcome measures Service outcomes (review times, number of clinic reviews); adverse events (unplanned emergency department re‐attendances at 30 days and 12 months; major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months, including unplanned revascularisation, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, cardiac death). Results Median time to review was shorter for RACPC than for usual care patients (12 days [IQR, 8–15 days] v 45 days [IQR, 27–89 days]). All patients seen in the RACPC received a diagnosis at the first clinic visit, but only 139 patients in the usual care group (32.0%). There were fewer unplanned emergency department re‐attendances for patients in the RACPC group at 30 days (1.6% v 4.4%) and 12 months (5.7% v 12.9%) than in the control group. Major adverse cardiovascular events were less frequent among patients evaluated in the RACPC (0.2% v 1.4%). Conclusions Patients were evaluated more efficiently in the RACPC than in a traditional cardiology clinic, and their subsequent rates of emergency department re‐attendances and adverse cardiovascular events were lower.

IAIbrahim Jatau Abubakar
Ibrahim Jatau Abubakar
BWBarbara C Wimmer
Barbara C Wimmer
LBLuke Bereznicki
Luke Bereznicki
CDCorinna Anne Dwan
Corinna Anne Dwan
JBJ. Andrew Black
J. Andrew Black
Gregory PetersonGregory Peterson
Gregory Peterson
Assessing and improving public knowledge of atrial fibrillation (AF) could increase its detection rate and the subsequent use of stroke prevention therapies. However, there is no validated AF knowledge assessment tool applicable to the general population, including those at risk of AF. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate such a tool. The tool was developed from a literature review and discussion with subject matter experts. Content validity was ensured by a ten-member panel of experts comprising cardiologists and pharmacists. An online validation survey was conducted and reported based on the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). The survey evaluated the tool performance by construct validity, internal consistency reliability, item discrimination, difficulty index and ease of readability. The survey participants included 14 general medical specialists, 20 fourth-year and 33 second-year undergraduate pharmacy students, and 122 members of the general public. The tool had satisfactory content validity, with a scale content validity index of 0.8. The mean percentage knowledge scores for general medical specialists and fourth-year pharmacy students were higher than second-year pharmacy students, followed by the general public (92.9%, 87.6%, 68.5% and 53.4%, respectively; p-value < 0.001), supporting construct validity. The tool had good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91). The item-total correlation was in the preferred range of 0.23 to 0.71. The Atrial Fibrillation Knowledge Assessment Tool is a valid instrument and can be used to investigate AF knowledge of the general population.

19 October 2023 in Heart, Lung and Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMitchell N. Sarkies
Mitchell N. Sarkies
LTLuke Testa
Luke Testa
SBStephanie Best
Stephanie Best
JMJoanna C. Moullin
Joanna C. Moullin
DSDavid Sullivan
David Sullivan
GWGerald F. Watts
Gerald F. Watts
Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a genetic condition that is a preventable cause of premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. High-level evidence and clinical practice guidelines support preventative care for people with FH. However, it is estimated that less than 10% of people at risk of FH have been detected using any approach across Australian health settings. The aim of this study was to identify the implementation barriers to and facilitators of the detection of FH in Australia. Four, 2-hour virtual focus groups were facilitated by implementation scientists and a clinicians as part of the 2021 Australasian FH Summit. Template analysis was used to identify themes. There were 28 workshop attendees across four groups (n=6-8 each), yielding 13 barriers and 10 facilitators across three themes: (1) patient related, (2) provider related, and (3) system related. A "lack of care pathways" and "upskilling clinicians in identifying and diagnosing FH" were the most interconnected barriers and facilitators for the detection of FH. The relationships between barriers and facilitators across the patient, provider, and system themes indicates that a comprehensive implementation strategy is needed to address these different levels. Future research is underway to develop a model for implementing the Australian FH guidelines into practice.

23 February 2021 in Medical Journal of Australia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJ. Andrew Black
J. Andrew Black
JCJulie A Campbell
Julie A Campbell
SPSerena Parker
Serena Parker
JSJames E Sharman
James E Sharman
MNMark R Nelson
Mark R Nelson
TMThomas H Marwick
Thomas H Marwick
Objectives To assess the efficacy of a pro‐active, absolute cardiovascular risk‐guided approach to opportunistically modifying cardiovascular risk factors in patients without coronary ischaemia atte...

21 March 2025 in Journal of Clinical Lipidology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMitchell Sarkies
Mitchell Sarkies
DSDavid Sullivan
David Sullivan
JBJ. Andrew Black
J. Andrew Black
PAPhilip Aylward
Philip Aylward
KKKaram Kostner
Karam Kostner
GWGerald F. Watts
Gerald F. Watts
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common and treatable inherited condition of cholesterol metabolism that increases cardiovascular health risk. Less than 10% of people with FH have been detected and few receive recommended treatment. We report on the development of a national implementation strategy for enhancing the detection of FH in Australia. A modified intervention mapping study was conducted, through workshops to identify barriers and facilitators of FH detection, models for detection and their objectives. Practical implementation strategies were selected using a constructivist analysis and summaries of the strategies were disseminated for feedback. A case study showcase was used to monitor strategy implementation. Potential models for FH detection were identified, including (1) use of pathology lab reports and recall; (2) screening in general practice, pharmacy, and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organizations; (3) screening in cardiovascular inpatients, outpatients, and rehabilitation; (4) universal screening; and (5) centralized coordination of primary-tertiary shared care. Implementation strategies were selected for each model to support their operationalization into routine care. A list of general implementation strategies was also produced that could support multiple models for FH detection. We identified multiple FH detection models and strategies that would support implementation across Australia. Centralized coordination of a primary-tertiary shared care model was described as a promising approach for integrating index case detection with family cascade testing. We provide a set of implementation recommendations for policy and practice to enhance the detection of FH in Australia.

29 July 2024 in Heart
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MNMark Nelson
Mark Nelson
JBJ. Andrew Black
J. Andrew Black
Aspirin is a foundation drug of the pharmaceutical industry originally derived as an analgesic/anti-inflammatory agent but serendipitously discovered to have use as a prophylactic drug for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Its modern-day utility in this latter role relies on its efficacy/safety balance in a contemporary population where, at least in high-income countries, age-standardised incident rates for MACE are falling, and where there are now competing therapeutic agents. Its future may be determined by its potential role as a chemoprophylactic or adjunct agent for cancer or other disease states. It therefore will continue to be the subject of further clinical research.