Enar Alotaibi

Dr. Enar Alotaibi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 October 2025 in Ear, Nose & Throat Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BABaraa Ibrahim Awad
Baraa Ibrahim Awad
LALaila Salah Laila Aldokhail
Laila Salah Laila Aldokhail
EAEnar Alotaibi
Enar Alotaibi
HAHatem Mohammed Asiri
Hatem Mohammed Asiri
YAYazeed Abdullah Asery
Yazeed Abdullah Asery
MHMohammed Halawani
Mohammed Halawani
Background: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), allergic rhinitis (AR), and asthma are common airway disorders that often coexist, suggesting shared inflammatory mechanisms. LPR involves gastric reflux into the laryngopharynx, while AR and asthma are linked by the “united airway” hypothesis. Evidence indicates LPR may contribute to AR and asthma exacerbation, yet their interactions remain unclear. Understanding their interaction may enhance clinical outcomes. Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the associations between LPR, AR, and asthma by analyzing studies that examined these conditions in various patient populations. Methodology: A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, was conducted for studies published up until 2024. Eligible studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria, and data on the prevalence, diagnostic methods, and associations between LPR, AR, and asthma were extracted. This systematic review was conducted and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024588367). Statistical analysis was performed to determine the strength of the associations between these conditions. Results: The review identified significant associations between LPR and both AR and asthma. Multiple studies confirmed a positive correlation between LPR and AR, with worse AR symptoms observed in patients with more severe LPR. Additionally, a strong association between LPR and asthma was observed, particularly in patients with poorly-controlled asthma. The analysis also revealed a robust relationship between AR and asthma, consistent with the “united airway” hypothesis, which posits that the upper and lower airways share common inflammatory pathways. These findings suggest that the coexistence of these conditions may exacerbate symptoms and complicate management. Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the significant associations between LPR, AR, and asthma, emphasizing the importance of recognizing and addressing these comorbidities in clinical practice. The findings suggest that managing 1 condition may have a beneficial effect on the others, supporting a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment.

18 December 2025 in Ear, Nose & Throat Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EAEnar Alotaibi
Enar Alotaibi
LALaila Salah Laila Aldokhail
Laila Salah Laila Aldokhail
GAGhadah Alotaibi
Ghadah Alotaibi
RARand Alshabnan
Rand Alshabnan
AAAseel Alamoudi
Aseel Alamoudi
IAIbrahim Alawadh
Ibrahim Alawadh
Background: Rhinoplasty is a widely performed cosmetic and functional procedure. Despite its popularity, postoperative dissatisfaction remains a common concern. This study aims to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life using the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) survey, to help improve preoperative planning and postoperative care. Patients and Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, EBSCO, and Web of Science using the terms “Rhinoplasty OR Septorhinoplasty,” “Satisfaction OR Prognosis OR Outcome,” “Quality of Life OR QoL,” and “ROE OR Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation.” All studies published between 2018 and 2024 were selected, and nonrelevant studies were excluded after full text review. Results: Twenty-four studies were included in a meta-analysis comparing ROE scores pre- and postoperative. The results demonstrated a significant improvement in satisfaction and quality of life postoperatively. The subgroup analysis revealed a notable variation in the outcome according to the country of origin. Although the study heterogeneity was high (I 2 = 99.8%), a random-effects model was used for the analysis. Conclusions: Gender was not a major determinant of satisfaction. However, the country of origin significantly influenced ROE scores. These findings emphasize the need for culturally sensitive counseling, individualized surgical planning, and management of patient expectations to enhance satisfaction.

27 May 2026 in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAdeeba Albadran
Adeeba Albadran
RAReem Alsugair
Reem Alsugair
AAAlanood AlHarthi
Alanood AlHarthi
HAHind Alshangiti
Hind Alshangiti
HAHuda Alqahtani
Huda Alqahtani
KAKhaled Alshehri
Khaled Alshehri
To compare the clinical and functional outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients aged ≥ 65 years with complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies published in English without date restrictions. Eligible studies compared RSA and ORIF in elderly patients with PHFs and reported functional, radiographic, or complication outcomes. Pooled data were analyzed using a random-effects model. Twenty-two studies involving > 34,000 patients were included. RSA was associated with greater forward flexion and a trend toward improved abduction, whereas internal rotation favored ORIF without reaching significance. No significant differences were observed in external rotation. The functional scores (Constant-Murley, Oxford Shoulder Score) were similar, and the complication and reoperation rates did not differ significantly between the groups. RSA offers modest advantages in forward flexion compared with ORIF but does not consistently improve overall functional scores or reduce complications. RSA may be preferred in elderly patients with poor bone stock or rotator cuff pathology, whereas ORIF remains appropriate for patients in whom joint preservation is feasible. High-quality RCTs with standardized outcome reporting are needed to clarify the optimal surgical management.

LALaila Salah Laila Aldokhail
Laila Salah Laila Aldokhail
EAEnar Alotaibi
Enar Alotaibi
MAMayar Alsaqr
Mayar Alsaqr
SASaleh Alabood
Saleh Alabood
AAAnwar Alshehri
Anwar Alshehri
EBEssa Bakry
Essa Bakry
Patulous Eustachian Tube (PET) is a rare otologic disorder, which is caused by abnormal patency of the Eustachian tube. Rapid weight loss is a recognized predisposing factor for PET potentially because of the reduction in peritubal adipose tissue that contributes to normal tubal closure. Although there is increasing awareness of this association, the best treatment of PET is still debated with several conservative, medical and surgical operations reported in the literature. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence regarding conservative, medical, minimally invasive, and surgical management of PET, with particular consideration of PET associated with rapid weight loss. Relevant literature was identified through searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, with attention to studies using standardized diagnostic criteria and outcome measures. Conservative approaches, including hydration, nasal saline instillation, and behavioral modifications such as cessation of habitual sniffing, have been associated with symptomatic improvement and considered as initial options because of their accessibility and low procedural burden. Medical therapies, such as topical irritants, estrogen-based preparations, and mucosal-thickening agents, may provide temporary symptom relief, although their long-term effects require further evaluation. Among interventional strategies, silicone (Kobayashi) plug insertion has demonstrated encouraging symptom improvement and reductions in symptom scores in selected patients with refractory PET. Minimally invasive techniques, including autologous fat injection, cartilage augmentation, and soft tissue bulking procedures, have also demonstrated encouraging outcomes. Trans-tympanic interventions, including ventilation-tube insertion and catheter-based techniques, provided additional options with variable reported outcomes. Management of PET remains heterogeneous and largely individualized. Conservative and medical therapies are considered reasonable first-line options, while surgical and minimally invasive approaches may be considered for selected patients with persistent symptoms.