Matthew R. Hallowell

Prof. Dr. Matthew R. Hallowell


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2010 in Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMatthew R. Hallowell
Matthew R. Hallowell
JGJohn A. Gambatese
John A. Gambatese
Construction engineering and management (CEM) researchers often rely on alternative research techniques when traditional methods fail. For example, surveys, interviews, and group-brainstorming techniques may not be appropriate for research that involves confounding factors and requires access to sensitive data. In such an environment, the Delphi technique allows researchers to obtain highly reliable data from certified experts through the use of strategically designed surveys. At present, the Delphi method has not seen widespread use in CEM research. This is likely due to variation among studies that implement Delphi in CEM research and ambiguity in literature that provides guidance for the specific parameters associated with the method. Using the guidance in this paper, the reader may: (1) understand the merits, appropriate application, and appropriate procedure of the traditional Delphi process; (2) identify and qualify potential expert panelists according to objective guidelines; (3) select the appropr...

1 December 2009 in Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMatthew R. Hallowell
Matthew R. Hallowell
JGJohn A. Gambatese
John A. Gambatese
Construction safety and health management has improved significantly following the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. In response to this legislation, contractors began implementing safety programs to reduce occupational safety and health hazards on construction sites. Researchers recently found that the current process of selecting specific elements for a safety program is informal. This paper describes the results of a recent study designed to determine the relative effectiveness of safety program elements by quantifying their individual ability to mitigate construction safety and health risks. In order to determine the effectiveness of individual safety program elements, the following research activities were performed: (1) an appropriate safety risk classification system was created using an aggregation of relevant literature; (2) highly effective safety program elements were identified in literature; and (3) the ability of each safety program element to mitigate a portion of each of the safe...

1 October 2013 in Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMatthew R. Hallowell
Matthew R. Hallowell
JHJimmie W. Hinze
Jimmie W. Hinze
KBKevin C. Baud
Kevin C. Baud
AWAndrew Wehle
Andrew Wehle
When constructing and updating the built environment, ensuring the safety of all parties involved is of utmost importance. Traditionally, safety has been measured and managed reactively, where actions are taken in response to adverse trends in injuries. Alternatively, safety-related practices can be measured during the construction phase to trigger positive responses before an injury occurs. Despite the potential benefits of such strategies, few have been identified in the literature and there has yet to be an organized effort to codify and investigate these methods. A mixed-methods research approach was used to (1) clearly identify and define elements of the safety management process that can be measured and monitored during the construction phase, (2) describe resource requirements for measurement, monitoring, and response, and (3) describe specific management actions required when any indicator fails to satisfy a desired value. To produce internally and externally valid and reliable results, da...

1 October 2013 in Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJimmie Hinze
Jimmie Hinze
MHMatthew R. Hallowell
Matthew R. Hallowell
KBKevin Baud
Kevin Baud
The construction industry has experienced a great deal of safety improvement after the Congress passed the Occupational Safety and Health Act in 1970. In the last twenty years, improvements have been made largely due to safety interventions that exceed compliance with government regulations. Researchers have long attempted to identify the most effective safety programs. However, studies in the past focused only on a small subset of potential injury-prevention options. In addition, to date, there has yet to be a study that documents a comprehensive list of safety strategies implemented by industry-leading companies. This research addresses this knowledge gap by creating a comprehensive list of construction-safety strategies from relevant literature and supplementing it with input from an expert panel. Once the strategies were identified (n=104), the research team conducted interviews with representatives from 57 projects in the United States to determine which strategies were implemented on each pr...

1 October 2013 in Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJohn Wanberg
John Wanberg
CHChristofer Harper
Christofer Harper
MHMatthew R. Hallowell
Matthew R. Hallowell
SRSathyanarayanan Rajendran
Sathyanarayanan Rajendran
It is well established that the project cost, quality, safety, and duration are the four critical elements that contribute to project success. Past literature has established theoretical relationships between construction safety and quality on the basis of opinions of industry experts. This is the first empirical inquiry into the relationship between safety and quality, testing the null hypothesis that there is no statistical relationship among quality performance indicators and safety performance indicators. To test this hypothesis, empirical data were collected from 32 building construction projects, ranging in scope from $50,000 to $300 million dollars. Several quality metrics (e.g., cost of rework per $1M project scope and rate of rework per 200,000 worker-hours) were used as predictor variables and first aid and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recordable injury rates were used as response variables. Linear regressions among the predictor and response variables showed that...

1 October 2009 in Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMatthew R. Hallowell
Matthew R. Hallowell
JGJohn A. Gambatese
John A. Gambatese
Most of safety risk research focuses on high-severity safety risks for large-scale construction processes. Such studies help firms identify the highest risk processes so they may be targeted for improvement. However, few studies quantify safety risk at the activity level or include low-severity, high-frequency risks that some literatures suggest contribute to a large proportion of total risk. This paper presents research that involved the holistic quantification of risks for the activities associated with the construction of concrete formwork. Three major research efforts are discussed: (1) identification of activities required to construct concrete formwork; (2) selection of an appropriate all-inclusive and mutually exclusive risk classification system; and (3) the quantification of the average frequency and severity levels for each risk classification associated with each activity. To identify formwork construction activities, 256 worker-hours of observation were conducted and the resulting activity des...