Walter Schenkeveld

Dr. Walter Schenkeveld

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 November 2023 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRouven Metz
Rouven Metz
NKNaresh Kumar
Naresh Kumar
WSWalter Schenkeveld
Walter Schenkeveld
SKStephan M. Kraemer
Stephan M. Kraemer
The iron phosphate mineral vivianite Fe(II)3(PO4)2·8H2O has emerged as a potential renewable P source. Although the importance of vivianite as a potential P sink in the global P cycle had previously been recognized, a mechanistic understanding of vivianite dissolution at the molecular level, critical to its potential application, is still elusive. The potential of vivianite as a P sink or source in natural or engineered systems is directly dependent on its dissolution kinetics under environmentally relevant conditions. To understand the thermodynamic and kinetic controls on bioavailability, the oxidation and dissolution processes of vivianite must be disentangled. In this study, we conducted controlled batch and flow-through experiments to quantitatively determine the dissolution rates and mechanisms of vivianite under anoxic conditions as a function of pH and temperature. Our results demonstrate that vivianite solubility and dissolution rates strongly decreased with increasing solution pH. Dissolution was nonstoichiometric at alkaline pH (>7). The rapid initial dissolution rate of vivianite is related to the solution saturation state, indicating a thermodynamic rather than a kinetic control. A defect-driven dissolution mechanism is proposed. Dissolution kinetics over pH 5-9 could be described with a rate law with a single rate constant and a reaction order of 0.61 with respect to {H+}: Rexp=36.0·e-1.41·pH·[1-e(0.2·ΔG/RT)]4.7 The activation energy of vivianite dissolution proved low (Ea = 20.3 kJ mol-1), suggesting hydrogen bridge dissociation as the rate-determining step.

12 December 2018 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKyounglim Kang
Kyounglim Kang
WSWalter Schenkeveld
Walter Schenkeveld
JBJagannath Biswakarma
Jagannath Biswakarma
SBSusan C. Borowski
Susan C. Borowski
SHStephan J. Hug
Stephan J. Hug
SKStephan M. Kraemer
Stephan M. Kraemer

20 December 2018 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJagannath Biswakarma
Jagannath Biswakarma
KKKyounglim Kang
Kyounglim Kang
SBSusan C. Borowski
Susan C. Borowski
WSWalter Schenkeveld
Walter Schenkeveld
SKStephan M. Kraemer
Stephan M. Kraemer
SHStephan J. Hug
Stephan J. Hug

6 May 2022 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KCKyle J. Chardi
Kyle J. Chardi
ASAnshuman Satpathy
Anshuman Satpathy
WSWalter Schenkeveld
Walter Schenkeveld
NKNaresh Kumar
Naresh Kumar
VNVincent Noël
Vincent Noël
DGDaniel Giammar
Daniel Giammar
Microbial reduction of soluble hexavalent uranium (U(VI)) to sparingly soluble tetravalent uranium (U(IV)) has been explored as an in situ strategy to immobilize U. Organic ligands might pose a potential hindrance to the success of such remediation efforts. In the current study, a set of structurally diverse organic ligands were shown to enhance the dissolution of crystalline uraninite (UO2) for a wide range of ligand concentrations under anoxic conditions at pH 7.0. Comparisons were made to ligand-induced U mobilization from noncrystalline U(IV). For both U phases, aqueous U concentrations remained low in the absence of organic ligands (500 times more U mobilization). This work shows the potential of numerous organic ligands present in the environment to mobilize both recalcitrant and labile U forms under anoxic conditions to hazardous levels and, in doing so, undermine the stability of immobilized U(IV) sources.

11 October 2023 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KCKyle J. Chardi
Kyle J. Chardi
WSWalter Schenkeveld
Walter Schenkeveld
NKNaresh Kumar
Naresh Kumar
DGDaniel Giammar
Daniel Giammar
SKStephan M. Kraemer
Stephan M. Kraemer
Anthropogenic and biogenic ligands may mobilize uranium (U) from tetravalent U (U(IV)) phases in the subsurface, especially from labile noncrystalline U(IV). The rate and extent of U(IV) mobilization are affected by geochemical processes. Competing metals and humic substances may play a decisive role in U mobilization by anthropogenic and biogenic ligands. A structurally diverse set of anthropogenic and biogenic ligands was selected for assessing the effect of the aforementioned processes on U mobilization from noncrystalline U(IV), including 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (DPA), citrate, N,N'-di(2-hydroxybenzyl)ethylene-diamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (HBED), and desferrioxamine B (DFOB). All experiments were performed under anoxic conditions at pH 7.0. The effect of competing metals (Ca, Fe(III), and Zn) on ligand-induced U mobilization depended on the particular metal-ligand combination ranging from nearly complete U mobilization inhibition (e.g., Ca-citrate) to no apparent inhibitory effects or acceleration of U mobilization (e.g., Fe(III)-citrate). Humic substances (Suwannee River humic acid and fulvic acid) were tested across a range of concentrations either separately or combined with the aforementioned ligands. Humic substances alone mobilized appreciable U and also enhanced U mobilization in the presence of anthropogenic or biogenic ligands. These findings illustrate the complex influence of competing metals and humic substances on U mobilization by anthropogenic and biogenic ligands in the environment.

5 October 2020 in BioMetals
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMatthias Baune
Matthias Baune
KKKyounglim Kang
Kyounglim Kang
WSWalter Schenkeveld
Walter Schenkeveld
SKStephan M. Kraemer
Stephan M. Kraemer
HHHeiko Hayen
Heiko Hayen
GWGünther Weber
Günther Weber