Licinio da Silva Portugal

Prof. Dr. Licinio da Silva Portugal

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 November 2021 in Transport Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GLGregório Luz
Gregório Luz
LPLicinio da Silva Portugal
Licinio da Silva Portugal
The paper builds on the transport-related social exclusion (TRSE) literature and investigates how the insights provided by the Capability Approach can help to inform inclusive transport planning. To address the literature lack of conceptual clarity, we provided a framework that considers how individuals may be prevented from travelling and accessing valued opportunities and how this may lead to TRSE. Ten different dimensions of TRSE that individuals may experience are suggested. Although some dimensions were already proposed in past work, we contributed to this framework by expanding their scope and proposing a new dimension. The paper concludes that policies aimed at reducing TRSE should be concerned with increasing the capabilities of those in accessibility poverty to a sufficient level that enables individuals’ participation in key opportunities of the society. We identified that not every accessibility measure is suitable for assessing TRSE, and the selection of measures must pay attention to their alignment with the idea of accessibility as a human capability. We recommend that conducting an aggregated analysis may be helpful to identify a suitable accessibility measure and to identify regions at risk of TRSE; however, to have a deep understanding of an individual’s TRSE risk factors, a bottom-up analysis is necessary.

1 December 2014 in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EOEduardo Leal de Oliveira
Eduardo Leal de Oliveira
LPLicinio da Silva Portugal
Licinio da Silva Portugal
WJWalter Porto Junior
Walter Porto Junior
This article focuses on the performance attributes congestion and vulnerability, proposing a conceptual framework based on recent research. We present a case study that allows observing the differences obtained in the ranking of importance of the links of a road network according to each of the two attributes. The differences observed suggest that the exclusive use of congestion indicators to determine performance bottlenecks can lead to misleading solutions

1 June 2016 in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EOEduardo Leal de Oliveira
Eduardo Leal de Oliveira
LPLicinio da Silva Portugal
Licinio da Silva Portugal
WJWalter Porto Junior
Walter Porto Junior

1 April 2004 in Cities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMarcello Marinho Berenger Vianna
Marcello Marinho Berenger Vianna
LPLicinio da Silva Portugal
Licinio da Silva Portugal
RBRonaldo Balassiano
Ronaldo Balassiano

19 April 2011 in Journal of Transport Geography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LPLicinio da Silva Portugal
Licinio da Silva Portugal
AMAndréa Vaz Morgado
Andréa Vaz Morgado
OJOrlando Fontes Lima Jr
Orlando Fontes Lima Jr

1 December 2014 in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JFJosefina Florez
Josefina Florez
JMJuliana Muniz
Juliana Muniz
LPLicinio da Silva Portugal
Licinio da Silva Portugal
Based on an extensive literature review, this article identifies the attributes that define the pedestrians quality of service, and based on interviews conducted with spectators at the three matches of the FIFA Confederations Cup that were played in June 2013 at Maracanã stadium in Rio de Janeiro, characterizes and identifies the most important attributes associated with the choice of travel on foot. These results contribute to the understanding of pedestrian behaviour at major sporting events–with the World Cup 2014 and the Olympic Games 2016 already in mind. The attributes that best define the pedestrian quality of service are accessibility, comfort, reliability, convenience, security, safety and sociability. In the case of Maracanã, the aspects most emphasized by the respondents interviewed were related to accessibility: rapidity, proximity and ease. However, we found that the perceived walking times–for all of the interviewed people–were shorter than the actual trip times. The stadium's location and the characteristics of the social and built environments are conditions that favour travel on foot and perceived proximity. These factors can be enhanced by good transportation and urban planning policies. However, pedestrians that make trips longer than 30minutes are attracted to the use of motorized modes, unless certain restrictions to these modes are present