Background: There has been no comprehensive longitudinal study of pulmonary functions (PFTS) in ALS determining which measure is most sensitive to declines in respiratory muscle strength. Objective: To determine the longitudinal decline of PFTS in ALS and which measure supports Medicare criteria for NIV initiation first. Methods: Serial PFTs (maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV), maximum inspiratory pressure measured by mouth (MIP) or nasal sniff pressure (SNIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)) were performed over 12 months on 73 ALS subjects to determine which measure showed the sentinel decline in pulmonary function. The rate of decline for each measure was determined as the median slope of the decrease over time. Medicare-based NIV initiation criteria were met if %FVC was ≤ 50% predicted or MIP was ≤ 60 cMH₂O. Results: 65 subjects with at least 3 visits were included for analyses. All median slopes were significantly different than zero. MEP and sitting FVC demonstrated the largest rate of decline. Seventy subjects were analyzed for NIV initiation criteria, 69 met MIP criteria first; 11 FVC and MIP criteria simultaneously and none FVC criteria first. Conclusions: MEP demonstrated a steeper decline compared to other measures suggesting expiratory muscle strength declines earliest and faster and the use of airway clearance interventions should be initiated early. When Medicare criteria for NIV initiation are considered, MIP criteria are met earliest. These results suggest that pressure-based measurements are important in assessing the timing of NIV and the use of pulmonary clearance interventions.

There is a growing understanding of the presymptomatic stages of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and nascent efforts aiming to prevent these devastating neurodegenerative diseases have emerged. This progress is attributable, in no small part, to the altruism of people living with pathogenic variants at elevated genetic risk for ALS/FTD via their willingness to participate in natural history studies and disease prevention trials. Increasingly, this community has also highlighted the urgent need to develop paradigms for providing appropriate clinical care for those at elevated risk for ALS and FTD. This manuscript summarises recommendations emanating from a multi-stakeholder Workshop (Malvern, Pennsylvania, 2023) that aimed to develop guidance for at-risk carriers and their treating physicians. Clinical care recommendations span genetic testing (including counselling and sociolegal implications); monitoring for the emergence of early motor, cognitive and behavioural signs of disease; and the use of Food and Drug Administration-approved small molecule drugs and gene-targeting therapies. Lifestyle recommendations focus on exercise, smoking, statin use, supplement use, caffeine intake and head trauma, as well as occupational and environmental exposures. While the evidence base to inform clinical and lifestyle recommendations is limited, this guidance document aims to appraise carriers and clinicians of the issues and best available evidence, and also to define the research agenda that could yield more evidence-informed guidelines.

Objective: To determine the target population and optimize the study design of the phase 3 clinical trial evaluating reldesemtiv in participants with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).Methods: We evaluated the phase 2 study of reldesemtiv, FORTITUDE-ALS, to inform eligibility criteria and design features that would increase trial efficiency and reduce participant burden of the phase 3 trial.Results: In FORTITUDE-ALS, the effect of reldesemtiv was particularly evident among participants in the intermediate- and fast-progressing tertiles for pre-study disease progression. These participants most often had symptom onset <= 24 months and an ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score <= 44 at baseline. Compared with the overall FORTITUDE-ALS population, the subgroup meeting these criteria declined by fewer ALSFRS-R points at 12 weeks (difference of least-squares mean [SE] versus placebo 1.84 [0.49] and 0.87 [0.35] for the overall population). These inclusion criteria will be used for the phase 3 clinical trial, COURAGE-ALS, in which the primary outcome is the change in ALSFRS-R total score at week 24. We also measure durable medical equipment use and evaluate strength in muscles expected to change rapidly. To reduce participant burden, study visits are often remote, and strength evaluation is simplified to reduce time and effort.Conclusions: In COURAGE-ALS, the phase 3 clinical trial to evaluate reldesemtiv, the sensitivity of detecting a potential treatment effect may be increased by defining eligibility criteria that limit the proportion of participants who have slower disease progression. Implementing remote visits and simplifying strength measurements will reduce both site and participant burden.ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03160898 (FORTITUDE-ALS) and NCT04944784 (COURAGE-ALS)

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare disease with urgent need for improved treatment. Despite the acceleration of research in recent years, there is a need to understand the full natural history of the disease. As only 40% of people living with ALS are eligible for typical clinical trials, clinical trial datasets may not generalize to the full ALS population. While biomarker and cohort studies have more generous inclusion criteria, these too may not represent the full range of phenotypes, particularly if the burden for participation is high. To permit a complete understanding of the heterogeneity of ALS, comprehensive data on the full range of people with ALS is needed. The ALS Natural History Consortium (ALS NHC) consists of nine ALS clinics and was created to build a comprehensive dataset reflective of the ALS population. At each clinic, most patients are asked to participate and about 95% do. After obtaining consent, a minimum dataset is abstracted from each participant's electronic health record. Participant burden is therefore minimal. Data on 1925 ALS patients were submitted as of 9 December 2022. ALS NHC participants were more heterogeneous relative to anonymized clinical trial data from the Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials (PRO-ACT) database. The ALS NHC includes ALS patients of older age of onset and a broader distribution of El Escorial categories, than the PRO-ACT database. ALS NHC participants had a higher diversity of diagnostic and demographic data compared to ALS clinical trial participants.Key MessagesWhat is already known on this topic: Current knowledge of the natural history of ALS derives largely from regional and national registries that have broad representation of the population of people living with ALS but do not always collect covariates and clinical outcomes. Clinical studies with rich datasets of participant characteristics and validated clinical outcomes have stricter inclusion and exclusion criteria that may not be generalizable to the full ALS population.What this study adds: To bridge this gap, we collected baseline characteristics for a sample of the population of people living with ALS seen at a consortium of ALS clinics that collect extensive, pre-specified participant-level data, including validated outcome measures.How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: A clinic-based longitudinal dataset can improve our understanding of the natural history of ALS and can be used to inform the design and analysis of clinical trials and health economics studies, to help the prediction of clinical course, to find matched controls for open label extension trials and expanded access protocols, and to document real-world evidence of the impact of novel treatments and changes in care practice.

Clinical care for people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PLWALS) is directed at slowing disease progression and symptom management. The American Academy of Neurology recommends a multidisciplinary approach to providing ALS health care because observational studies show that multidisciplinary clinics (MDCs) extend survival and improve quality of life. However, providing multidisciplinary care is a challenging financial proposition. To understand how MDCs are financed, we surveyed ALS MDCs across the Northeast ALS Consortium network in the United States. We surveyed clinic directors in the Northeast ALS Consortium, a group of institutions equipped to provide ALS care and perform research and clinical trials in ALS. Respondents (n = 61; response rate = 49.6%) provided information regarding their care model, services, funding sources, and financial solvency between December 2020 and August 2021. In 74% (n = 45) of clinics, PLWALS were seen by the entire multidisciplinary team, and in 26% (n = 16) of clinics, PLWALS were seen by the physician and triaged according to needs. In 79% (n = 48) of clinics, visit duration was ≥3 hours, and on average, 8.4 services were available, compared with 6.8 in clinics lasting <3 hours. Most of the MDCs offer occupational (97%; n = 59), speech (97%; n = 59), and physical (95%; n = 58) therapies on site. The most common source of financial support was third-party nonprofits/philanthropy (92%; n = 56). Fifty-nine percent (n = 36) of clinics received financial support from their parent organizations (e.g., universities). Only 17% (n = 10) of clinics reported no deficit, and all clinics used multiple income sources. These findings reconfirm the range of services available to PLWALS and highlight the financial challenges facing ALS MDCs. The main limitation is that recruitment was through the NEALS network which primarily includes MDCs, so we were not able to compare with non-MDCs. Since not all centers responded, there may be other differences in the characteristics of the centers that did respond and those that did not leading to some bias. Future work should support the goal of reducing reliance on funding from nonprofits and increase reimbursement from payers, so health care providers can provide high-quality ALS care and cover costs.