Giovanni Bubici

Dr. Giovanni Bubici

Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 April 2019 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giovanni BubiciGiovanni Bubici
Giovanni Bubici
MKManoj Kaushal
Manoj Kaushal
Maria Isabella PrigigalloMaria Isabella Prigigallo
Maria Isabella Prigigallo
Carmen Gómez-Lama CabanásCarmen Gómez-Lama Cabanás
Carmen Gómez-Lama Cabanás
Jesús Mercado-BlancoJesús Mercado-Blanco
Jesús Mercado-Blanco
In the last century, the banana crop and industry experienced dramatic losses due to an epidemic of Fusarium wilt of banana (FWB), caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense (Foc) race 1. An even more dramatic menace is now feared due to the spread of Foc tropical race 4. Plant genetic resistance is generally considered as the most plausible strategy for controlling effectively such a devastating disease, as occurred for the first round of FWB epidemic. Nevertheless, with at least 182 articles published since 1970, biological control represents a large body of knowledge on FWB. Remarkably, many studies deal with biological control agents (BCAs) that reached the field-testing stage and even refer to high effectiveness. Some selected BCAs have been repeatedly assayed in independent trials, suggesting their promising value. Overall under field conditions, FWB has been controlled up to 79% by using Pseudomonas spp. strains, and up to 70% by several endophytes and Trichoderma spp. strains. Lower biocontrol efficacy (42–55%) has been obtained with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Bacillus spp., and non-pathogenic Fusarium strains. Studies on Streptomyces spp. have been mostly limited to in vitro conditions so far, with very few pot-experiments, and none conducted in the field. The BCAs have been applied with diverse procedures (e.g., spore suspension, organic amendments, bioformulations, etc.) and at different stages of plant development (i.e., in vitro, nursery, at transplanting, post-transplanting), but there has been no evidence for a protocol better than another. Nonetheless, new bioformulation technologies (e.g., nanotechnology, formulation of microbial consortia and/or their metabolites, etc.) and tailor-made consortia of microbial strains should be encouraged. In conclusion, the literature offers many examples of promising BCAs, suggesting that biocontrol can greatly contribute to limit the damage caused by FWB. More efforts should be done to further validate the currently available outcomes, to deepen the knowledge on the most valuable BCAs, and to improve their efficacy by setting up effective formulations, application protocols, and integrated strategies.

1 March 2012 in Plant Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RJRafael M. Jiménez-Díaz
Rafael M. Jiménez-Díaz
MCMatteo Cirulli
Matteo Cirulli
Giovanni BubiciGiovanni Bubici
Giovanni Bubici
MJMaría del Mar Jiménez-Gasco
María del Mar Jiménez-Gasco
PAPolymnia P. Antoniou
Polymnia P. Antoniou
ETEleftherios C. Tjamos
Eleftherios C. Tjamos

5 August 2022 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Maria Isabella PrigigalloMaria Isabella Prigigallo
Maria Isabella Prigigallo
Carmen Gómez-Lama CabanásCarmen Gómez-Lama Cabanás
Carmen Gómez-Lama Cabanás
JMJesús Mercado-Blanco
Jesús Mercado-Blanco
Giovanni BubiciGiovanni Bubici
Giovanni Bubici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Foc) tropical race 4 (TR4) is threatening banana production because of its increasing spread. Biological control approaches have been widely studied and constitute interesting complementary measures to integrated disease management strategies. They have been based mainly on the use of single biological control agents (BCAs). In this study, we moved a step forward by designing a synthetic microbial community (SynCom) for the control of Fusarium wilt of banana (FWB). Ninety-six isolates of Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., Streptomyces spp., and Trichoderma spp. were obtained from the banana rhizosphere and selected in vitro for the antagonism against Foc TR4. In pot experiments, a large community such as SynCom 1.0 (44 isolates with moderate to high antagonistic activity) or a small one such as SynCom 1.1 (seven highly effective isolates) provided similar disease control (35% symptom severity reduction). An in vitro study of the interactions among SynCom 1.1 isolates and between them and Foc revealed that beneficial microorganisms not only antagonized the pathogen but also some of the SynCom constituents. Furthermore, Foc defended itself by antagonizing the beneficial microbes. We also demonstrated that fusaric acid, known as one of the secondary metabolites of Fusarium species, might be involved in such an interaction. With this knowledge, SynCom 1.2 was then designed with three isolates: Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. piscium PS5, Bacillus velezensis BN8.2, and Trichoderma virens T2C1.4. A non-simultaneous soil application of these isolates (to diminish cross-inhibition) delayed FWB progress over time, with significant reductions in incidence and severity. SynCom 1.2 also performed better than two commercial BCAs, BioPak® and T-Gro. Eventually, SynCom 1.2 isolates were characterized for several biocontrol traits and their genome was sequenced. Our data showed that assembling a SynCom for biocontrol is not an easy task. The mere mixtures of antagonists (e.g., SynCom 1.0 and 1.1) might provide effective biocontrol, but an accurate investigation of the interactions among beneficial microorganisms is needed to improve the results (e.g., SynCom 1.2). SynCom 1.2 is a valuable tool to be further developed for the biological control of FWB.

5 December 2018 in CABI Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giovanni BubiciGiovanni Bubici
Giovanni Bubici
Streptomycetes are the largest taxon of antibiotic producers in the microbial world. Nevertheless, they are less studied than other biocontrol agents against Fusarium diseases and, perhaps, plant diseases in general. Plant diseases incited by Fusarium species are notably challenging. Four species complexes in the genus are pathogenic: Fusarium fujikuroi , F. graminearum , F. solani and F. oxysporum . Being a vascular pathogen, F. oxysporum is particularly difficult to control by using microbial antagonists. Most research has remained at early experimental stages, and only few Streptomyces spp. strains have been assayed under diverse conditions. Few commercial products consisting of Streptomyces spp. have often provided fluctuating results across trials. Five biocontrol trials conducted in the field using streptomycetes report reductions of diverse Fusarium wilts by 0-55%, with one case (cucumber) of yield increase by 1.3-fold. Among 38 articles dealing with pot-experiments, 16 report a disease control level above 50%, seven of which with a level above 70%. The chitinolytic activity of Streptomyces spp. strains plays an important role in the biocontrol of Fusarium diseases, and the plant growth promotion trait is a cherished outcome. More attention is being paid to strains endophytic, producing volatile organic compounds, or to the identification of antibiotics and metabolites responsible for the biocontrol. Bioformulation is a critical point in the use of biocontrol agents, but it has been still poorly considered in the experiments. The biocontrol efficacy of well-designed streptomycete consortia or the so-called microbial synthetic communities, possibly in proper bioformulations, and the role of streptomycetes in the reduction of mycotoxins in the grains are aspects that would merit further investigation in the future.

1 October 2011 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Giovanni BubiciGiovanni Bubici
Giovanni Bubici
MCMatteo Cirulli
Matteo Cirulli

14 February 2008 in Plant Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCC. Colella
C. Colella
CMC. Miacola
C. Miacola
MAM. Amenduni
M. Amenduni
MDM. D’aMico
M. D’aMico
Giovanni BubiciGiovanni Bubici
Giovanni Bubici
MCM. Cirulli
M. Cirulli