Johannes Kamp

Johannes Kamp


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 February 2024 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JTJonas Trepel
Jonas Trepel
ERElizabeth le Roux
Elizabeth le Roux
AAAndrew J. Abraham
Andrew J. Abraham
RBRobert Buitenwerf
Robert Buitenwerf
JKJohannes Kamp
Johannes Kamp
Jens-Christian SvenningJens-Christian Svenning
Jens-Christian Svenning

8 June 2015 in Conservation Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJohannes Kamp
Johannes Kamp
SOSteffen Oppel
Steffen Oppel
AAAlexandr A. Ananin
Alexandr A. Ananin
YDYurii A. Durnev
Yurii A. Durnev
SGSergey N. Gashev
Sergey N. Gashev
SCSimba Chan
Simba Chan

22 October 2020 in Journal of Ornithology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJohannes Kamp
Johannes Kamp
CFClaudia Frank
Claudia Frank
STSven Trautmann
Sven Trautmann
MBMalte Busch
Malte Busch
RDRainer Dröschmeister
Rainer Dröschmeister
CSChristoph Sudfeldt
Christoph Sudfeldt
Biodiversity monitoring is important as it allows to prioritize research into the causes of declines and assessing the efficacy of conservation measures. Regional assessments are valuable, because conservation policies and management are often implemented on national and sub-national level. We analyzed data from the German Common Bird Monitoring for 1990–2018. We derived indices of population size using standard log-linear models, based on point counts and route territory mapping at up to 1200 plots annually. We summarized species trends by ecological trait groups. Among the 93 common breeding birds, farmland birds declined strongly, birds of settlements declined. Forest birds initially declined, but recovered after ca. 2010. Wetland birds increased strongly, albeit the number of species with data was low. Consistent declines were found in ground-nesting birds, granivorous and invertebrate (other than insect)-feeding birds. Trends of insectivorous birds were stable on average, but farmland insectivores declined strongly since the year 2000. Long-distance migrants showed more negative trends compared to short-distance migrants and resident species. Species with narrow habitat niche declined disproportionally. Trends over the entire period were more negative in common species in the dataset (with a German breeding population of > 50 K and < 1 M pairs). On the opposite, short-term trends were more negative in less common species (< 50 K pairs). Cold-adapted species showed largely negative, warm-adapted largely positive trends. Multi-species indicators showed no directional change (i.e., a change from decline to increase or vice versa) conditional on the inclusion or omission of single species, but the magnitude of change was affected in groups with low sample size. This suggests that efforts should be made to develop robust monitoring schemes for rarer species that are not covered by the analyses here. We conclude that conservation policies in Germany should aim at halting the worrying declines in ground-nesting, often insectivorous, farmland birds. The recovery of forest and wetland birds is encouraging, but future trends need to be monitored. Ongoing climate change will affect species directly (via their thermal niche) and indirectly (e.g., through more forest disturbance). Conservation strategies will, therefore, need to consider species adaptation to environmental and climate change, e.g., in better protected area connectivity and management.

23 September 2015 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJohannes Kamp
Johannes Kamp
RURuslan Urazaliev
Ruslan Urazaliev
ABAndrew Balmford
Andrew Balmford
PDPaul F. Donald
Paul F. Donald
RGRhys E. Green
Rhys E. Green
BPBen Phalan
Ben Phalan

19 March 2016 in Biodiversity and Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JKJohannes Kamp
Johannes Kamp
MKMaxim A. Koshkin
Maxim A. Koshkin
TBTatyana Michailovna Bragina
Tatyana Michailovna Bragina
TKTodd E. Katzner
Todd E. Katzner
EME. J. Milner-Gulland
E. J. Milner-Gulland
RURuslan Urazaliev
Ruslan Urazaliev

21 October 2020 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMartin Freitag
Martin Freitag
JKJohannes Kamp
Johannes Kamp
ADAndrey Dara
Andrey Dara
TKTobias Kuemmerle
Tobias Kuemmerle
TSTatyana V. Sidorova
Tatyana V. Sidorova
NHNorbert Hölzel
Norbert Hölzel
Globally, grasslands are shaped by grazing and fire, and grassland plants are adapted to these disturbances. However, temperate grasslands have been hotspots of land‐use change, and how such changes affect interrelations between herbivory, fire and vegetation are poorly understood. Such land‐use changes are widespread on the Eurasian steppe, where the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 triggered the abandonment of cropland and pasture on globally relevant scales. Thus, to determine how relationships between plant functional composition, grazing and fire patterns changed after the Soviet Union dissolved, we studied a 358,000 km2 region in the dry steppe of Kazakhstan, combining a large field dataset on plant functional traits with multi‐scale satellite data. We found that increases in burned area corresponded to decreases in livestock grazing across large areas. Furthermore, fires occurred more often with high cover of grasses with high leaf dry matter content and thus higher flammability, whereas higher grazing pressure favoured grazing‐tolerant woody forbs and ruderal plants with high specific leaf area. The current situation of low grazing pressure represents a historically exceptional, potentially non‐analogue state. We suggest that the dissolution of the Soviet Union caused the disturbance regime to shift from grazer to fire control. As grazing and fire each result in different plant functional compositions, we propose that this led to widespread increases in grasses and associated changes in steppe plant community structure. These changes have potentially occurred across an area of more than 2 million km2, representing much of the world's largest temperate grassland area, with globally relevant, yet poorly understood implications for biodiversity and ecosystem functions such as carbon cycling. Additionally, future steppe management must also consider positive implications of abandonment (‘rewilding’) because reverting the regime shift in disturbance and associated changes in vegetation would require grazing animals to be reintroduced across vast areas.