Background: Submicroscopic chromosomal imbalance is associated with an increased nuchal translucency (NT). Most previous research has recommended the use of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for prenatal diagnosis if the NT ≥ 3.5 mm. However, there is no current global consensus on the cutoff value for CMA. In this study, we aimed to discuss the fetuses with smaller increased NT which was between cutoff value of NT for karyotype analysis (NT of 2.5 mm in China) and the recommended cutoff value for CMA (NT of 3.5 mm) whether should be excluded from CMA test.Methods: Singleton pregnant women (N = 192) who had undergone invasive procedures owing to an increased NT (NT ≥ 2.5 mm) were enrolled. Fetal cells were collected and subjected to single nucleotide polymorphism array and karyotype analyses simultaneously. Cases were excluded if the karyotype analysis indicated aneuploidy and apparent structural aberrations.Results: Fourteen cases of aneuploidy and four cases of structural abnormalities were excluded. Of the remaining 174 cases, 119 fetuses had NTs of 2.5–3.4 mm, and 55 fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Eleven copy number variants (CNVs) were identified. In fetuses with smaller NTs, six (6/119, 5.9%) variations were detected, including two (2/119, 1.6%) clinically significant CNVs (pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNV), one likely benign CNV, two variants unknown significance, and one incidental CNV. Five (5/55, 9.1%) variations were found in fetuses with NT ≥ 3.5 mm. Among these CNVs, three (3/55, 5.5%) cases had clinically significant CNVs, and two had likely benign CNV. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of all CNVs and clinically significant CNVs in the two groups (p > 0.05).Conclusion: CMA improved the diagnostic yield of chromosomal aberrations for fetuses with NTs of 2.5–3.4 mm and apparently normal karyotype, regardless of whether other ultrasonic abnormalities were observed.

Application of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) to investigate the genetic characteristics of fetal growth restriction (FGR) without ultrasonic structural anomalies at 18–32 weeks. This study includes singleton fetuses with the estimated fetal weight (EFW) using the formula of Hadlock C below the 10th percentile for gestational age. FGRs without structural anomalies were selected, and the ones at high risk of noninvasive prenatal testing for trisomy 13, 18 and 21 would be excluded. The cases were divided into two groups: early-onset group (< 24+ 0 weeks) and late-onset group (24–33 weeks). All patients were offered invasive prenatal testing with CMA and karyotype analysis. CMA detected 10 pathogenic copy number variants and 2 variant of uncertain significance case. CMA has a 5.5% (7/127) incremental yield of pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities over karyotyping. The positive detected rate was 9.6% (5/52) in early-onset group and 9.3% (7/75) in late-onset group respectively. When FGR without structural anomaly is diagnosed before 33 weeks, an invasive prenatal procedure is strongly recommended. CMA can identify a 5.5% (7/127) incremental detection rate of pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities, which would impact clinical management for FGR.

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) has emerged as a primary diagnostic tool for the evaluation of developmental delay and structural malformations in children. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and value of CMA and karyotyping on diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in Fujian province of South China. In the study, 410 clinical samples were collected from pregnant women between March 2015 and December 2016, including 3 villus (0.73%, 3/410), 296 amniotic fluid (72.20%, 296/410), and 111 umbilical cord blood (27.07%, 111/410). All samples were screening for chromosomal abnormalities by both using CMA and karyotyping. The success rate of CMA and karyotyping was 100% (410/410) and 99.27% (407/410), respectively. Sixty-one (14.88%, 61/410) samples were presented with chromosomal abnormalities by using CMA, whereas 47 (11.55%, 47/407) samples were shown with chromosomal abnormalities by using karyotyping. Thirty-one (8.61%, 31/360) samples with normal karyotypes were found to exist chromosomal abnormalities by using CMA. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve of karyotyping on the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities was 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.87–0.93), the sensitivity and specificity was 87.56% and 91.22%, respectively. The area under the curve of CMA on the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.90–0.95), with 90.68% sensitivity and 94.40% specificity. Notably, the combination of CMA and karyotyping could improve the diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. CMA has a better diagnostic value for screening chromosomal abnormalities, especially for those pregnant women with normal karyotypes. This study has guiding value for prenatal diagnosis in Fujian province of South China.

Introduction: Increased nuchal translucency (NT) is closely related to an increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities. However, the criterion of increased NT for invasive prenatal diagnosis remains controversial, as the cutoff values are inconsistent among countries. This study was conducted to compare the various cutoff values of increased NT and calculate the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities to determine the predictive ability of these cutoff values in conventional chromosome analysis. Methods: A total of 3223 invasive samples with increased nuchal translucency (NT) or other non-ultrasound indications were collected from singleton pregnant women. Samples with isolated increased NT were divided into five groups based on the NT thickness: 909 samples in the NT ≥ 2.5 mm group, 819 samples in the NT ≥ 95th group, 547 samples in the NT ≥ 99th group, 527 samples in the NT ≥ 3.0 mm group, and 253 samples in the NT ≥ 3.5 mm group; 2301 samples with normal NT were considered as the control group. All five groups were karyotyped and the results were compared. The accuracy of the NT cutoff value for the screening of chromosomal abnormalities was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Detection of all chromosomal aberrations and trisomy 21 showed that the sensitivity and false-positive rate decreased sequentially in the NT ≥ 2.5 mm, NT ≥ 95th, NT ≥ 3 mm, NT ≥ 99th, and NT ≥ 3.5 mm groups, whereas the specificity, positive predictive value, and false-negative rates increased sequentially. Comprehensive analysis of various factors, including sensitivity and specificity, revealed values equal to or higher than the calculated 95th percentile of NT distribution, which showed a sensitivity of 49.2% and specificity of 75.67% for detecting all aneuploidies and a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 75.45% for trisomy 21, exhibiting the highest ability for the screening of chromosomal defects in first-trimester screening. Conclusion: For different thresholds of NT thickness, values equal to or higher than the calculated 95th percentile of the NT distribution showed the highest ability for the screening of chromosomal defects in first-trimester screening.

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in detecting the origin and structure of small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) in prenatal and postnatal cases and to clarify sSMC-related genotype-phenotype correlations. Thirty-three cases carrying sSMCs were identified by banding cytogenetics. Of these cases, twenty-nine were first characterized by CMA and only two by FISH. The remaining two cases were excluded for their refusal to accept further examination. The chromosomal origins of twenty-two cases were successfully identified, in which pathogenetic copy number variations (PCNVs) were found in sixteen cases, four cases showed variants of uncertain significance (VOUS), one case showed benign CNVs, and one case showed probable PCNVs. For the nine cases with negative CMA results, only one of them contained centromere heterochromatin likely due to its normal phenotype, whereas reasons for the remaining eight cases were uncertain. We also found that CMA results indicating pathogenic abnormalities further affect the rate of pregnancy termination. This study showed that CMA combined with cytogenetic analysis is particularly effective in identifying sSMCs. However, in order to establish sSMC-related genotype-phenotype correlations, the inclusion of more sSMC cases will be necessary in future studies.

Objective: To explore the relationship and mechanism of LZAP in the occurrence and development of cervical cancer and to provide a new target and intervention method for the treatment of cervical cancer.