In Australia, 45% of adults meet the aerobic recommendations, and only 9%-30% meet the resistance training guidelines. Given the lack of at-scale community-based interventions promoting resistance training, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of an innovative mHealth intervention on upper- and lower-body muscular fitness, cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, and social-cognitive mediators among a sample of community-dwelling adults. Researchers evaluated the community-based ecofit intervention using a cluster RCT from September 2019 to March 2022 in 2 regional municipalities of New South Wales, Australia. Researchers recruited a sample of 245 participants (72% female, aged 53.4±13.9 years) who were randomized to the ecofit intervention group (n=122) or waitlist control (n=123) group. The intervention group received access to a smartphone application with standardized workouts tailored to 12 outdoor gym locations and an introductory session. Participants were encouraged to perform at least 2 ecofit workouts per week. Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 9 months. The coprimary muscular fitness outcomes were evaluated using the 90-degree push-up and the 60-second sit-to-stand test. Intervention effects were estimated using linear mixed models accounting for group-level clustering (participants could enroll in groups of up to 4). Statistical analysis was conducted in April 2022. Statistically significant improvements were observed in upper (1.4 repetitions, 95% CI=0.3, 2.6, p=0.018) and lower (2.6 repetitions, 95% CI=0.4, 4.8, p=0.020) body muscular fitness at 9 months but not at 3 months. Increases in self-reported resistance training, resistance training self-efficacy, and implementation intention for resistance training were statistically significant at 3 and 9 months. This study has shown that a mHealth intervention promoting resistance training using the built environment can improve muscular fitness, physical activity behavior, and related cognitions in a community sample of adults. This trial was preregistered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12619000868189).

Aims: Dietary modification is essential for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, there are limited published evidence syntheses to guide practice in the cardiac rehabilitation (CR) setting. This systematic review’s objective was to assess effectiveness and reporting of nutrition interventions to optimize dietary intake in adults attending CR. Methods and results: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of nutrition interventions within CR were eligible for inclusion and had to have measured change in dietary intake. MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library were searched from 2000 to June 2020, limited to publications in English. Evidence from included RCTs was synthesized descriptively. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. This review is registered on PROSPERO; CRD42020188723. Of 13 048 unique articles identified, 11 were eligible. Randomized controlled trials were conducted in 10 different countries, included 1542 participants, and evaluated 29 distinct dietary intake outcomes. Five studies reported statistically significant changes in diet across 13 outcomes. Most nutrition interventions were not reported in a manner that allowed replication in clinical practice or future research. Conclusion: There is a gap in research testing high-quality nutrition interventions in CR settings. Findings should be interpreted in the light of limitations, given the overall body of evidence was heterogenous across outcomes and study quality; 6 of 11 studies were conducted more than 10 years old. Future research should investigate strategies to optimize and maintain nutrition improvements for patients attending CR. Registration: PROSPERO; CRD42020188723.

Background: Few mobile health resistance-based physical activity interventions have targeted community-dwelling adults. “Ecofit” is a multicomponent intervention that promotes resistance and aerobic activities using smartphone technology, outdoor gyms, and social support. This study evaluated process evaluation outcomes of the ecofit randomized controlled trial: (1) the acceptability and usability of the ecofit smartphone app and app user workouts; (2) perceptions of factors influencing outdoor gym use; and (3) the fidelity, reach, recruitment, and dose received of the ecofit program. Methods: Process data were collected through program evaluation surveys at 3 months, and app usage data were collected via the intervention platform for up to 3 months. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The survey was completed by 57% (n = 69) of eligible participants. The majority (93%) believed the app provided them with sufficient information to perform muscle-strengthening activities. Approximately half (51%) agreed that the goal-setting function encouraged them to complete their workouts, and 42% agreed that the self-assessment helped them monitor progress. “Proximity” to outdoor gyms emerged as the most important factor for choosing locations to workout (mean = 5.5, SD = 1.1). Participants logged a median of 5.5 (interquartile range = 19) workouts and 1 (interquartile range = 1) upper- and lower-body muscular fitness self-assessment. Conclusions: The ecofit app provided participants with sufficient skills to perform unsupervised resistance training exercises using mobile health. Only half of the participants regarded self-assessments and goal setting as useful, suggesting a need for modifications to how these are implemented. Mobile health remains a promising delivery platform to promote unsupervised resistance training, although more research is needed to improve uptake.

Purpose: To reduce risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults, as assessed by primary care doctors in rural NSW, Australia. Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) was delivered by Accredited Practicing Dietitians (APDs) using telehealth. Methods: The study was a 12-month pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. All primary care practices (PCPs) within a large rural region were invited to participate, with enrolled practices stratified based on rurality and practice size. Patients at moderate to high CVD risk were recruited via practices. Usual care (UC) was provided by the patient’s general practitioner (GP). In addition to UC, the intervention group received two hours of MNT telehealth (video calls) consultations from an APD during five sessions over 6 months. The primary outcome was total serum cholesterol. Secondary outcomes included LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, blood glucose control, blood pressure, weight and waist circumference. Changes were analysed using Bayesian linear mixed models and posterior probability. Findings: Sixteen PCPs recruited 132 eligible participants (n = 91 intervention, n = 41 UC), with 79% (72/91) and 80% (33/41) respectively completing a primary or secondary outcome. No significant differences were found between groups for total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol or blood pressure at 12-months. However, the intervention group had significant improvements in blood glucose control (HbA1c: -0.16%, 95%CI: -0.32, -0.01) and decreased body weight (-2.46 kg, 95%CI: -4.54, -0.41) compared to UC at 12-months. Conclusions: Results indicate that two hours of MNT delivered by an APD via telehealth is a synergistic adjunct therapy to support the usual care provided by GP, with benefits continuing to 12-months.

In this paper we outline the protocol for an implementation-effectiveness trial of ecofit, a multi-component mHealth intervention aimed at increasing participation in resistance and aerobic physical activity using the outdoor built environment (i.e., outdoor gyms) and social support. We have previously demonstrated the efficacy and effectiveness of the ecofit program in insufficiently active people with (or at risk of) type 2 diabetes and community-dwelling adults, respectively. The objective of this trial is to compare the effects of two implementation support models (i.e., 'Low' versus 'Moderate') on the reach (primary outcome), uptake, dose received, impact and fidelity of the ecofit program. This hybrid type III implementation-effectiveness study will be evaluated using a two-arm randomized controlled trial, including 16 outdoor gym locations in two large regional municipalities in New South Wales, Australia. Outdoor gym locations will be pair-matched, based on an established socio-economic status consensus-based index (high versus low), and randomized to the 'Low' (i.e., ecofit app only) or 'Moderate' (i.e., ecofit app, face-to-face workout sessions and QR codes) implementation support group. The primary outcome of 'reach' will be measured using a modified version of the 'System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities', capturing outdoor gym use amongst community members. This implementation-effectiveness trial will evaluate the effects of different levels of implementation support on participation in resistance-focused physical activity using mHealth and outdoor gyms across the broader community. This may guide widespread dissemination for councils (municipalities) nation-wide wanting to promote outdoor gym usage. This trial was preregistered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12624000261516).