Kellinghaus C, Berning S, Immisch I, Larch J, Rosenow F, Rossetti AO, Tilz C, Trinka E. Intravenous lacosamide for treatment of status epilepticus.Acta Neurol Scand: 2011: 123: 137–141.© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objectives – Treatment of established status epilepticus (SE) requires immediate intravenous anticonvulsant therapy. Currently used first‐line drugs may cause potentially hazardous side effects. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous lacosamide (LCM) in SE after failure of standard treatment. Methods – We retrospectively analyzed 39 patients (21 women, 18 men, median age 62 years) from the hospital databases of five neurological departments in Germany, Austria and Switzerland between September 2008 and January 2010 who were admitted in SE and received at least one dose of intravenous LCM. Results – Types of SE were generalized convulsive (n = 6), complex partial (n = 17) and simple partial (n = 16). LCM was administered after failure of benzodiazepins or other standard drugs in all but one case. Median bolus dose of LCM was 400 mg (range 200–400 mg), which was administered at 40–80 mg/min in those patients where infusion rate was documented. SE stopped after LCM in 17 patients, while 22 patients needed further anticonvulsant treatment. The success rate in patients receiving LCM as first or second drug was 3/5, as third drug 11/19, and as fourth or later drug 3/15. In five subjects, SE could not be terminated at all. No serious adverse events attributed to LCM were documented. Conclusions – Intravenous LCM may be an alternative treatment for established SE after failure of standard therapy, or when standard agents are considered unsuitable.

Background and Objectives CSF in antibody-defined autoimmune encephalitis (AE) subtypes shows subtype-dependent degrees of inflammation ranging from rare and often mild to frequent and often robust. AEs with NMDA receptor antibodies (NMDAR-E) and leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 antibodies (LGI1-E) represent opposite ends of this spectrum: NMDAR-E with typically frequent/robust and LGI1-E with rare/mild CSF inflammation. For a more in-depth analysis, we characterized CSF findings in acute, therapy-naive NMDAR-E and LGI1-E in a multicentric, retrospective, cross-sectional setting. Methods Eighty-two patients with NMDAR-E and 36 patients with LGI1-E from the GErman NEtwork for Research of AuToimmune Encephalitis (GENERATE) with lumbar puncture within 90 days of onset and before immunotherapy were included. CSF parameters comprised leukocytes, oligoclonal bands (OCBs), and CSF/serum ratios for albumin, immunoglobulin G (IgG), A (IgA), and M (IgM), the latter 3 converted to Z scores according to Reiber formulas. The MRZ reaction was tested in 14 patients with NMDAR-E and 6 patients with LGI1-E, respectively. Results CSF was abnormal in 94% of NMDAR-E but only in 36% of LGI1-E patients. Robust quantitative intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis (IIS, IgG > IgM >> IgA) was characteristic for NMDAR-E, but absent in LGI-E. In NMDAR-E, CSF leukocytes were higher when IIS was present or more pronounced. In addition, in NMDAR-E, CSF leukocytes were lower and IIS occurred less often and if so to a lesser degree at older age. Patients with NMDAR-E with severe functional impairment more often had positive OCBs. In CSF obtained later than 3 weeks of onset, leukocytes were lower. In parallel, the correlation of leukocytes with IIS disappeared as IIS was partially independent of disease duration. The MRZ reaction was positive in 5 (36%) patients with NMDAR-E. All these associations were completely absent in LGI1-E. Here, younger patients showed more blood-CSF barrier dysfunction. In LGI1-E, but not in NMDAR-E, the blood-CSF barrier was more dysfunctional when CSF leukocytes were higher. Discussion NMDAR-E and LGI-E differ in their typical extent of CSF inflammation. In addition, the patterns formed by the different inflammatory CSF parameters and their relationship with disease severity, age, and disease duration are subtype-characteristic. Moreover, signs for multiple sclerosis-like chronic inflammation are present in a subgroup of patients with NMDAR-E. These CSF patterns might be markers for the different immunopathogeneses of LGI1-E and NMDAR-E.