Transforming the current food system into one which delivers healthy, sustainable diets will require some form of governance. Due to the complex nature of the food system, multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs), which bring together actors from multiple sectors into a shared space for joint decision making, have been proposed as one potential governance structure. Using the Food Change Lab, a multi-stakeholder platform led by a local civil society organization in Fort Portal, Uganda, as a case study, this paper uses an explicit conceptual framework for food system governance to understand how such an MSP can support improved food system outcomes. Local-level, civil-society-led MSPs have a limited ability to support a system-based problem framing, due to a tension between a holistic view of the system and identifying concrete entry points for action. They can support boundary spanning by creating horizontal linkages but are less effective in creating vertical linkages due to their locally embedded nature. Because such MSPs are not dependent on formal policy processes, they can be very adaptable and flexible in prioritizing issues and focus areas. The greatest influence of such MSPs in food governance is in supporting inclusiveness, especially of marginalized voices. While such MSPs are unlikely to be able to achieve food system transformation alone, they do play a key role in engaging with marginalized groups, supporting inclusion of local issues and promoting alternative food system visions.

Integrated land–soil–crop information systems are increasingly important for supporting climate-smart agricultural planning and implementation, yet their development in Eastern Africa is constrained by fragmented mandates, weak technical capacity, and limited data interoperability. This study assesses how institutional readiness, user demand, and technical and human-capacity conditions shape the integration of such systems into national Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS). A mixed-methods, multi-country assessment was conducted in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Rwanda (2022–2024), drawing on 145 semi-structured key-informant interviews, stakeholder mapping, national workshops, and a regional synthesis consultation. The analysis addressed three objectives: (i) diagnose institutional readiness and user demand; (ii) assess technical, infrastructural, and human-capacity requirements; and (iii) identify governance and design principles for embedding integrated information systems within AKIS and Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) strategies. The results show consistently high demand for spatially explicit soil and crop data but persistent fragmentation of mandates, uneven coordination, and substantial subnational capacity gaps. Despite these constraints, emerging digital-agriculture strategies, open-data policies, and regional soil-health initiatives provide potential entry points for integration. The study offers a comparative evidence base and design principles—covering governance, interoperability standards, co-production processes, and capacity strengthening—needed to transition from project-driven fragmentation toward interoperable and sustainable information systems. These findings provide diagnostic and design-oriented insights for national and regional efforts to strengthen agricultural information systems that support CSA implementation in Eastern Africa.