ALK-positive histiocytosis is a rare subtype of histiocytic neoplasm first described in 2008 in 3 infants with multisystemic disease involving the liver and hematopoietic system. This entity has subsequently been documented in case reports and series to occupy a wider clinicopathologic spectrum with recurrent KIF5B-ALK fusions. The full clinicopathologic and molecular spectra of ALK-positive histiocytosis remain, however, poorly characterized. Here, we describe the largest study of ALK-positive histiocytosis to date, with detailed clinicopathologic data of 39 cases, including 37 cases with confirmed ALK rearrangements. The clinical spectrum comprised distinct clinical phenotypic groups: infants with multisystemic disease with liver and hematopoietic involvement, as originally described (Group 1A: 6/39), other patients with multisystemic disease (Group 1B: 10/39), and patients with single-system disease (Group 2: 23/39). Nineteen patients of the entire cohort (49%) had neurologic involvement (7 and 12 from Groups 1B and 2, respectively). Histology included classic xanthogranuloma features in almost one-third of cases, whereas the majority displayed a more densely cellular, monomorphic appearance without lipidized histiocytes but sometimes more spindled or epithelioid morphology. Neoplastic histiocytes were positive for macrophage markers and often conferred strong expression of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase, confirming MAPK pathway activation. KIF5B-ALK fusions were detected in 27 patients, whereas CLTC-ALK, TPM3-ALK, TFG-ALK, EML4-ALK, and DCTN1-ALK fusions were identified in single cases. Robust and durable responses were observed in 11/11 patients treated with ALK inhibition, 10 with neurologic involvement. This study presents the existing clinicopathologic and molecular landscape of ALK-positive histiocytosis and provides guidance for the clinical management of this emerging histiocytic entity.

Vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is a rare but potentially fatal eye condition for which early diagnosis is crucial to ensuring appropriate treatment and improving the unfavorable prognosis. However, the notoriously insidious course of this disease, as well as its masquerading presentation (eg, as intraocular inflammation), often hamper accurate diagnosis.¹ A unique hallmark of VRL is the presence in approximately 75% of cases of an oncogenic hotspot mutation in myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MYD88), which changes the amino acid leucine to proline at amino acid position 265 (L265P).² Since MYD88 L265P is an oncogenic mutation not present in nonneoplastic proliferations,^2,3 detection of this tumor-specific mutation provides definite evidence of a malignant neoplasm (ie, VRL). In other words, patients who are clinically suspected of having VRL and who present with MYD88 L265P in ocular tissues can be definitively diagnosed with VRL and receive prompt chemotherapy treatment.² In principle, the diagnosis of VRL is established by the detection of malignant cells in ocular fluids (routinely in vitreous fluid [VF]) by cytomorphologic evaluation, supported by the use of flow cytometry or immunoglobulin gene rearrangement analysis to expose clonal populations.^4-6 Unfortunately, the presence of clonal cell populations is not limited to VRL, and more importantly, cytomorphologic evaluation often fails to detect lymphoma cells because of low cellularity or cell lysis during VF biopsies.^7-9

Nearly 20 years ago, the first description of a translocation involving chromosome 17 on which USP6 resides was described. Since then, not only the culprit gene but also many fusion partners, leading to transcriptional activation of USP6, have been detected. The first neoplasm known to harbor USP6 rearrangements was aneurysmal bone cyst. Since then, other entities like nodular fasciitis, myositis ossificans, fibro-osseous pseudotumor of digits, and a subgroup of fibromas of tendon sheath, probably representing tenosynovial nodular fasciitis, have been added to the list of USP6-rearranged lesions. Remarkably, all of them share clinical as well as morphological characteristics, and authors have suggested that these entities actually belong to the same spectrum. This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding USP6-rearranged lesions and further elaborates on how these neoplasms relate to one another. We propose to call these lesions UAN (Usp6-associated neoplasm).

EWSR1 belongs to the FET family of RNA-binding proteins including also Fused in Sarcoma (FUS), and TATA-box binding protein Associated Factor 15 (TAF15). As consequence of the multifunctional role of EWSR1 leading to a high frequency of transcription of the chromosomal region where the gene is located, EWSR1 is exposed to aberrations such as rearrangements. Consecutive binding to other genes leads to chimeric proteins inducing oncogenesis. The other TET family members are homologous. With the advent of widely used modern molecular techniques during the last decades, it has become obvious that EWSR1 is involved in the development of diverse benign and malignant tumors with mesenchymal, neuroectodermal, and epithelial/myoepithelial features. As oncogenic transformation mediated by EWSR1-fusion proteins leads to such diverse tumor types, there must be a selection on the multipotent stem cell level. In this review, we will focus on the wide variety of soft tissue and bone entities, including benign and malignant lesions, harboring EWSR1 rearrangement. Fusion gene analysis is the diagnostic gold standard in most of these tumors. We present clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features and discuss differential diagnoses.