Margarita Archinkova

Prof. Dr. Margarita Archinkova


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 April 2026 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Natasha YanevaNatasha Yaneva
Natasha Yaneva
MPMeri Petrova
Meri Petrova
AYAdelina Danielova Yordanova
Adelina Danielova Yordanova
TPTrifon Popov
Trifon Popov
MAMargarita Archinkova
Margarita Archinkova
EKEkaterina Krasimirova Kurteva
Ekaterina Krasimirova Kurteva
Background: Screening for presymptomatic type 1 diabetes (T1D) reduces the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and allows for early intervention with disease-modifying therapies. Despite the rising incidence of T1D in Bulgaria, screening initiatives remain limited. This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility of selective T1D screening in high-risk children and identify potential clinical associations with islet autoimmunity. Methods: The study targeted a recruitment of 250 children aged 0–18 years (200 with a relative with T1D and 50 without). Screening for islet autoantibodies (AABs), including glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA), insulin (IAA), insulinoma-associated-2 (IA-2A), zinc transporter-8 (ZnT8A), and islet cell cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ICAs), was performed via chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). Participants testing positive for one or more AABs were scheduled for longitudinal immunological and metabolic follow-up to evaluate the persistence of autoimmunity and disease progression. Results: Between October 2024 and February 2026, the pilot study recruited 210 participants (84% of the 250 target), including 160 children with a relative (target 200) and 50 without a family history of T1D (target 50). Within the high-risk group, seven children (4.4%) tested positive for a single autoantibody (3 GADA, 2 ZnT8A, 1 IA-2A, and 1 IAA), while no autoantibodies were detected in the group without a relative. No cases of multiple autoantibody positivity or stage 3 T1D were identified in either group. Furthermore, no statistically significant associations were observed between autoantibody positivity and secondary factors, including breastfeeding, allergic status, a high-glycemic diet, frequent illness, and personal history of autoimmune disease. Conclusions: The findings validate the feasibility of selective T1D screening in Bulgaria, driven by high public interest and successful recruitment across both high-risk and general population cohorts. While this exploratory study found no significant clinical correlations, it establishes a vital roadmap for larger, longitudinal research. Ultimately, this pilot framework provides a scalable model for implementing standardized early detection to reduce the burden of T1D on the national healthcare system.

8 September 2026 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Natasha YanevaNatasha Yaneva
Natasha Yaneva
TPTrifon Popov
Trifon Popov
MPMeri Petrova
Meri Petrova
AYAdelina Danielova Yordanova
Adelina Danielova Yordanova
MAMargarita Archinkova
Margarita Archinkova
EKEkaterina Krasimirova Kurteva
Ekaterina Krasimirova Kurteva
Background: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) incidence is rising at 3–5% per year. Autoantibody (AAB) screening identifies at-risk children pre-symptomatically, yet the clinical significance of single AAB positivity and its short-term trajectory remain incompletely characterized. Methods: Five T1D-associated AABs (anti-GAD65, anti-IA2, anti-ZnT8, ICA, IAA) were measured in 210 Bulgarian children (160 with first-degree T1D relatives, 50 controls). Seven single-AAB-positive children received lifestyle counseling (low-glycemic-index diet, physical activity ≥ 60 min/day) and were reassessed at 3 or 6 months with repeat AAB panels, HbA1c, blood glucose and C-peptide. Results: Anti-GAD65 was the most frequent single AAB (n = 3), followed by anti-ZnT8 (n = 2), anti-IA2 (n = 1) and IAA (n = 1). None developed a second AAB or metabolic abnormalities. Titer dynamics were heterogeneous: two children showed apparent seroreversion (in one, substantially confounded by concurrent immunosuppressive therapy for an unrelated condition), one showed a ~15-fold titer reduction while remaining seropositive, one showed a minimal titer decrease, and three displayed mildly increasing titers. None progressed to multiple autoantibody positivity, and all maintained normal metabolic profiles. Conclusions: Favorable short-term outcomes were observed during follow-up of children with single autoantibody positivity. These findings suggest that single AAB positivity may follow a non-progressive course in some children. However, this study design cannot distinguish the contribution of lifestyle counseling from natural variability. Prospective controlled studies with larger cohorts, HLA stratification and longer follow-up are needed to determine whether lifestyle interventions can independently alter autoantibody dynamics and delay T1D progression.