SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination induces robust humoral and cellular immunity in the circulation; however, it is currently unknown whether it elicits effective immune responses in the respiratory tract, particularly against variants of concern (VOCs), including Omicron. We compared the SARS-CoV-2 S–specific total and neutralizing antibody responses, and B and T cell immunity, in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) and blood of COVID-19–vaccinated individuals and hospitalized patients. Vaccinated individuals had significantly lower levels of neutralizing antibody against D614G, Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron BA.1.1 in the BAL compared with COVID-19 convalescents despite robust S-specific antibody responses in the blood. Furthermore, mRNA vaccination induced circulating S-specific B and T cell immunity, but in contrast to COVID-19 convalescents, these responses were absent in the BAL of vaccinated individuals. Using a mouse immunization model, we demonstrated that systemic mRNA vaccination alone induced weak respiratory mucosal neutralizing antibody responses, especially against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1.1 in mice; however, a combination of systemic mRNA vaccination plus mucosal adenovirus-S immunization induced strong neutralizing antibody responses not only against the ancestral virus but also the Omicron BA.1.1 variant. Together, our study supports the contention that the current COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective against severe disease development, likely through recruiting circulating B and T cell responses during reinfection, but offer limited protection against breakthrough infection, especially by the Omicron sublineage. Hence, mucosal booster vaccination is needed to establish robust sterilizing immunity in the respiratory tract against SARS-CoV-2, including infection by the Omicron sublineage and future VOCs.

To determine whether CT-to-body divergence can be overcome to improve the diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary nodules with the combination of shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (SSRAB) and portable 3-dimensional (3D) imaging. A single-center, prospective, pilot study was conducted from February 9, 2021, to August 4, 2021, to evaluate the combined use of SSRAB and portable 3D imaging to visualize tool-in-lesion as a correlate to diagnostic yield. Thirty lesions were subjected to biopsy in 17 men (56.7%) and 13 women (43.3%). The median lesion size was 17.5 mm (range, 10-30 mm), with the median airway generation of 7 and the median distance from pleura of 14.9 mm. Most lesions were in the upper lobes (18, 60.0%). Tool-in-lesion was visualized at the time of the procedure in 29 lesions (96.7%). On the basis of histopathologic review, 22 (73.3%) nodules were malignant and 6 (20.0%) were benign. Two (6.7%) specimens were suggestive of inflammation, and the patients elected observation. The mean number of spins was 2.5 (±1.6) with a mean fluoroscopy time of 8.7 min and a mean dose area product of 50.3 Gy cm² (±32.0 Gy cm²). There were no episodes of bleeding or pneumothorax. The diagnostic yield was 93.3%. This pilot study shows that the combination of mobile 3D imaging and SSRAB of pulmonary nodules appears to be safe and feasible. In conjunction with appropriate anesthetic pathways, nodule motion and divergence can be overcome in most patients. https://clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT04740047